Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2768 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I believe I had a club fitting experience that I suspect was not typical, so I wanted to share and then follow up with a question.  I don't have a true handicap, but just to put my play in some kind of perspective.  I generally shoot in the 80s on fairly easy municipal courses.  I'll throw in an occasional high 70s and I can creep up into the high 80s quite easily if I'm a little off or unlucky.  That's just to give a sense of where I am in the journey.

I arrived for my fitting very excited.  I was looking to purchase a new driver.  My clubs (including my driver) are about 5-7 years old, so I figured why not buy myself a new toy and take advantage of the technology of this game.  There was certainly nothing wrong with my current driver, however.

Upon seeing the clubs I brought, John (the fitter) commented about how my clubs were a little bit older and he excitedly went into how new clubs across the board would be a boon for me.  I dreaded hearing this as I thought I might receive some pressure to drop 1500 dollars when 400-500 was going to be enough to come up with.  Still, I was excited thinking that tech advancement in the last few years might just take my game up a tiny amount.

I started to take some shots and after several I mentioned that I was pleased because, while the shots didn't appear to stellar on the big screen, my swing still felt pretty normal and I thought the contact felt about average for me so that whatever read he got for the various metrics was probably pretty indicative of my general swing.  After that, I started to hit drivers.  I don't exactly crush the ball off the tee and my shots were of the typical unspectacular variety, but again were pretty normal.  At this point, John gave me several different drivers to try, and though they often felt pretty good, the results didn't seem to improve much.  

Personally, I don't really trust the big screen entirely on distance and roll out, so I was still willing to buy.  I wasn't expecting miracles, I understand that the swing dictates the results, but I still figured that a driver that is several generations newer was still bound to offer a slight bump in distance and would perhaps be a bit more forgiving.  However, John, to his credit, told me that my swing was simply too erratic and that I would not be able to glean the benefit of a newer club until I fixed the issues I have with: grip, posture, setup, and overall swing.  

Just to add a bit of context here, most of my numbers were OK, but my spin rate was much too high and none of the clubs he tried could lower the spin rate enough to be worth the money.  This is my guess as to what he saw as he never really got into specifics beyond letting me know that what I needed was lessons, but he did at least go into the numbers in a cursory fashion at one point.  As I say, I actually appreciate the fact that he didn't feel like he could put together a club that would bring about the kind of change that would be worth the investment and thus refused to lure me into what he no doubt considered a waste of money.  It was impressive that he showed that type of integrity.

So, beyond wondering if anyone here has had a fitter refuse to steer them toward a club or type of club to look for, my question is this:  He said himself, that the newer clubs could offer a bit more distance when you hit them right and I have to believe that clubs are always improving in terms of being a little more forgiving on errant shots.  This was all I was expecting, wouldn't a new club still have some value?  It would seem that if you needed a certain level of swing to glean any benefit from newer clubs, than why would anyone other than the top 5-10 percent of players ever buy a new club?  It seemed odd to me, I just have to believe that a better club will still give at least a modicum of improvement regardless of skill level, but what do you think?

As a post script, I headed to the range to work on drills and tips that my lower my spin rate using my old driver.  But, I still can't help but think that the newer technology will bring a little benefit, even to a mid handicap type player.


Posted

@jas80s I bought a new driver a month or so ago 2017 m1. While the fitter is correct about correcting your swing i feel a new driver of the current tech would be instantly beneficial with distance and foregiveness. For instance my old driver was a Callway x hot. Not exactly ancient but the distance gains and accuracy improved dramatically with the m1.  I have a very over the top swing that produced a fade and tiptoed on a slice on any given swing. The new driver and weights helped with this. Did not correct but helped. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

  :sunmountain: eco lite stand Bag
:tmade: Sim 2 Max driver
 :callaway: Mavrick 20 * hybrid
:tmade: M2 3HL                               :mizuno: JPX 923 5-gw                           

 Lazrus 52, 56 wedges

:scotty_cameron:
:true_linkswear:-Lux Hybrid, Lux Sport, Original 1.2

:clicgear:


Posted

My wife and I were recommended a fitter 4 years ago. We were both prepared to buy new clubs (been golfing two years with gifted clubs)

Turned out he is old school-some type of flight scope, a couple of manual devices. (You can tell I'm old school). Works out of a local indoor range. 25 years in the biz

He spent considerable time with both of us, bent the wife's putter, gave her clubs a thumbs up (apparently the buyer had a good eye) and suggested my clubs were shite. I purchased new clubs and wedges.

I Ended up with Golf pride grips, matrix shafts and GI KZG heads. 

He probably spent 4 or 5 hours with us, all in

4 years later, I have played into those clubs, they feel like a family friend. Last winter had him fit me for a new driver , also KZG (I didn't want knobs to change as I won't use them) The experience was awesome. Between fitting time and delivery time, I had three hours with this guy. 

I see him regularly at the indoor range in the winter, regularly comes by and checks out my clubs for wear. 

I"m thinking about a new set next year, my last year of work, take advantage of a pay check and before he retires.

Has my golf improved because of the clubs, maybe, but I really enjoy the buying experience better than a box store. Is it expensive, not in my mind.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Nice post @jas80s.  I agree with your fitter that in many cases, if you’re a mediocre golfer, new clubs will not benefit you much.  You didn’t mention what your old clubs are but, reading between the lines, I assume the fitter thought they were already a decent fit for you.  If they were way off he may have been able to come up with something that performs better, not because of new technology but just from more appropriate specs.  Drivers from 5-7 years ago are pretty similar to drivers today.

In my opinion most of the advances in the last several years have been more options, more adjustability, better looks, and better feel.  It’s hard not to falter under the onslaught of the golf club advertising machine but it really mostly is just marketing.

And going against the grain here, that includes the “get fit” mantra — especially for average golfers.  They might need some general equipment advice, but not a 2 hour trackman session.

Edited by allenc
  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/11/2018 at 9:12 AM, allenc said:

Nice post @jas80s.  I agree with your fitter that in many cases, if you’re a mediocre golfer, new clubs will not benefit you much.  You didn’t mention what your old clubs are but, reading between the lines, I assume the fitter thought they were already a decent fit for you.  If they were way off he may have been able to come up with something that performs better, not because of new technology but just from more appropriate specs.  Drivers from 5-7 years ago are pretty similar to drivers today.

In my opinion most of the advances in the last several years have been more options, more adjustability, better looks, and better feel.  It’s hard not to falter under the onslaught of the golf club advertising machine but it really mostly is just marketing.

And going against the grain here, that includes the “get fit” mantra — especially for average golfers.  They might need some general equipment advice, but not a 2 hour trackman session.

To be honest, I left kind of wondering if maybe I had missed the truth that fitting was usually something only sought out by very good players and that mid or high handicap players would not benefit greatly from the experience.  The experience had been a tad humiliating.

I was particularly interested though because I am only 5'5" and thus I had been choking all the way down on my driver.  Moreover, I thought this might finally lay to rest any questions about what flex or type of shaft would be best for my swing, and perhaps what weight would be best for a club head.  As I say, I had hoped for a modest bump in yardage from a newer club, but in reality, I really sought out the fitting to establish just what kind of length, weight, and shaft would work best as well.  If nothing else, I thought at the very least, I would purchase a club that felt really comfortable in my hands.  Alas, my guy didn't really think I was ready for that, but as you say, he also might have felt like the club I had in my hand was the right club for me already.  Though, in point of fact, he never said anything like that.

He did cut my club down by a half inch (at my request), so we did address that.  Maybe that was all that was needed.

The wind up is, I went back to youtube to address high spin rate on my drives and now I am working on hitting up on the ball a bit more, which in the end, is far and away my best chance to pick up any distance off the tee anyway....I honestly DO get that..  😀


Note: This thread is 2768 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • This is an awesome breakdown. most of the bigger tournaments usually have one wave with the advantage, Thank you for the breakdown. If it is soft then it will be a lower final score
    • Over the past 15 years, the winning score has ranged from -10 to -20. Mostly around -13.  Here is Thursday and Friday weather. Saturday and Sunday weather. I think the course will play soft. Plenty of sky cover, lots of rain on Thursday. Fairways and greens will probably stay soft throughout the week.  In terms of tee times, I think Thursday morning and Friday afternoon have the biggest advantage. I bolded the big group of each set.  Most beneficial with the weather Round 1: No. 1 tee, Round 2: No. 10 tee 7:40 a.m., 12:30 p.m.: Mark Hubbard, Thorbjørn Olesen, Mac Meissner 7:52 a.m., 12:42 p.m.: Bud Cauley, Vince Whaley, Chandler Phillips 8:04 a.m., 12:54 p.m.: Emiliano Grillo, Christiaan Bezuidenhout, Max Greyserman 8:16 a.m., 1:06 p.m.: Kevin Yu, Cam Davis, Gary Woodland 8:28 a.m., 1:18 p.m.: Ricky Castillo, Ryan Gerard, Patrick Cantlay 8:40 a.m., 1:30 p.m.: Adam Schenk, Garrick Higgo, Matt McCarty 8:52 a.m., 1:42 p.m.: Brian Harman, Maverick McNealy, Davis Riley 9:04 a.m., 1:54 p.m.: Sami Valimaki, Lucas Glover, Matt Fitzpatrick 9:16 a.m., 2:06 p.m.: Michael Brennan, Harris English, J.T. Poston 9:28 a.m., 2:18 p.m.: Haotong Li, Zecheng Dou, Jordan Smith Round 1: No. 10 tee, Round 2: No. 1 tee 7:40 a.m., 12:30 p.m.: Mackenzie Hughes, Eric Cole, Rico Hoey 7:52 a.m., 12:42 p.m.: Max Homa, Daniel Berger, Michael Thorbjornsen 8:04 a.m., 12:54 p.m.: Rasmus Højgaard, Danny Walker, Kristoffer Reitan 8:16 a.m., 1:06 p.m.: Jhonattan Vegas, Taylor Pendrith, Alex Noren 8:28 a.m., 1:18 p.m.: Akshay Bhatia, Brooks Koepka, Tony Finau 8:40 a.m., 1:30 p.m.: Collin Morikawa, Ludvig Åberg, Si Woo Kim 8:52 a.m., 1:42 p.m.: Scottie Scheffler, Tommy Fleetwood, Justin Thomas 9:04 a.m., 1:54 p.m.: Viktor Hovland, Russell Henley, Robert MacIntyre 9:16 a.m., 2:06 p.m.: Aldrich Potgieter, Jake Knapp, Sungjae Im 9:28 a.m., 2:18 p.m.: Patton Kizzire, Seamus Power, Johnny Keefer Most hurt by the weather Round 1: No. 1 tee, Round 2: No. 10 tee 12:30 p.m., 7:40 a.m.: Lee Hodges, Andrew Putnam, Sam Stevens 12:42 p.m., 7:52 a.m.: Erik van Rooyen, Keith Mitchell, Michael Kim 12:54 p.m., 8:04 a.m.: Taylor Moore, Joel Dahmen, Ryo Hisatsune 1:06 p.m., 8:16 a.m.: Jacob Bridgeman, Ben Griffin, Adam Scott 1:18 p.m., 8:28 a.m.: J.J. Spaun, Sepp Straka, Shane Lowry 1:30 p.m., 8:40 a.m.: Sahith Theegala, Rickie Fowler, Jordan Spieth 1:42 p.m., 8:52 a.m.: Xander Schauffele, Rory McIlroy, Hideki Matsuyama 1:54 p.m., 9:04 a.m.: Chris Gotterup, Justin Rose, Min Woo Lee 2:06 p.m., 9:16 a.m.: Brian Campbell, Karl Vilips, Aaron Rai 2:18 p.m., 9:28 a.m.: Matti Schmid, Max McGreevy, Takumi Kanaya 2:30 p.m., 9:40 a.m.: Zach Bauchou, Sudarshan Yellamaraju, A.J. Ewart Round 1: No. 10 tee, Round 2: No. 1 tee 12:30 p.m., 7:40 a.m.: Tom Hoge, Denny McCarthy, Nicolai Højgaard 12:42 p.m., 7:52 a.m.: Patrick Rodgers, Kevin Roy, Marco Penge 12:54 p.m., 8:04 a.m.: Chad Ramey, Alex Smalley, Pierceson Coody 1:06 p.m., 8:16 a.m.: Kurt Kitayama, Harry Hall, Stephan Jaeger 1:18 p.m., 8:28 a.m.: Keegan Bradley, Ryan Fox, Chris Kirk 1:30 p.m., 8:40 a.m.: Andrew Novak, Nick Taylor, Wyndham Clark 1:42 p.m., 8:52 a.m.: Steven Fisk, William Mouw, Joe Highsmith 1:54 p.m., 9:04 a.m.: Cameron Young, Davis Thompson, Sam Burns 2:06 p.m., 9:16 a.m.: Nico Echavarria, Jason Day, Corey Conners 2:18 p.m., 9:28 a.m.: Matthieu Pavon, S.H. Kim, Austin Smotherman  
    • Things that I am or have worked on... 1.    Trail Elbow - Check 2.    Hip Turn - Check 3.    Rolled Inside - Check 4.    Wide Takeaway - Check 5.    Sway and Tilt - Nope, but I did a hip turn and tilt 🤣 I am giving myself 4.5/5 for my long backswing.  Great post! 
    • We have a very difficult but mostly showy course this week. Lets see what they got. This course offers so many chances to get into trouble it is really a mental minefield. I am excited to see who can handle it and who cant. Last year we got a foreshadowing of JJ and Rory, I am excited for this year Who do people have winning? what will the winning score be? I am thinking 12 or 13 under
    • Wordle 1,726 6/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.