Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2608 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

My son is a mid 80's golfer 13 years old. He had been using vt max custom junior clubs.  He is growing out of them and it's time for a new set of irons.  He is 4'11 with a 73 mph swing speed with a 7iron.  All charts point to an A flex shaft. My question is how much does cutting down the shaft change the flex.  Does a Ladies flex become an A flex when you cut down 1.5 -2 inches.  Does an a flex become a regular when it's cut to size?  I know shortening the lever will decrease the flex.  I just don't know how much.

thanks


Posted

Hi. Shaft weight is far more important that flex. I'd recommend seeing a fitter/builder who is able to see if he strong enough to progress into an adult headweight, with a shaft of the correct weight and playing length. They will be able to make them a touch longer than necessary so they last a good couple of years, then the same head can be reshafted when he needs a heavier shaft.


Posted

Thanks Jam-ez,  He has been using adult driver, 5 wood and hybrid heads with a custom junior shaft for the past couple years.

We did some initial tests with trackman and he did well with a m4 head and a shaft 55 grams or lighter. At 60g it was getting too heavy. A women's shaft showed some signs that the flex was starting to get too light.

The problem I had is finding a fitter that REALLY understands junior golfers and how their small stature applies to golf equipment.  When you find someone, they don't really stock many heads and shafts to try combinations to get an accurate fit.


Posted

The 2 fitters I talked with were unable to answer the question I posed here.  How stiff would an A flex or an L flex shaft become if it were cut to size and how would that effect his ball flight.


Posted

There a couple of very knowledgeable independent fitters in the south with a great selection of lightweight options, see who you feel most comfortable using.

As for flex, if you cut a shaft down from the butt end the CPM number will increase.  Many people assume this result in the shaft getting stiffer but this merely just a number and has no relevance to flex unless you take playing length into consideration.  Have a look at a shaft frequency chart in google images.  As a result, the frequency of the club will decrease and the club will play softer, especially of you reintroduce additional headweight to increase swingweight that was lost in cutting the club down. However, flex really is of secondary importance here and irrelevant if the shaft is too heavy or light in the first instance. A little as 5 grams out could be the difference between a shaft working or simply just not at all.

I feel the most productive way forward would be for your son to see someone who is able to identify the correct shaft weight in the first instance. The fitter will then be able to control ball flight with a combination of different shaft bend profiles and clubs specs such as measured loft, playing length and lastly  swingweight which should never! be overlooked.

In reference to flex affecting ball flight, there are too many unknown variables here - shaft weight, dead weight, swing weight, is he currently playing with something too heavy or light in these characteristics?  These will have a more dramatic effect on ball flight than flex alone.

Hope this helps.


Posted

As far as flex goes with trimming, tip trimming will have a greater influence on the flex then butt trimming. Yes in theory simply making the club shorter from the butt will increase the frequency, however it is less then you might think because you are cutting from the stiffer side of the shaft. Remember, the butt end is always stiffer than the tip and continues to increase in stiffness all the way to the butt end. There are a few exceptions with certain shafts where the very end may soften again just as there are cases where the tip end softens before beginning to stiffen again in the tip mid section. This is a lot more detail then you probably need but the point is don't worry about the butt trimming so much with stiffness. If you want it stiffer, tip trim more. Just make sure you know your parallel tip length so you don't cut beyond the taper start.

But I also agree flex is less important than weight. Best rule I can give you is go as light as you can without losing control/consistency. You want him swinging the club, not the other way around.


Note: This thread is 2608 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.