Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Stan Utley Short Game theories


Note: This thread is 6026 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just finished reading Stan Utley's "The Art of the Short Game" and was curious if any other have read it. I liked the fact that his technique for chips and pitchs was basically a mini full swing. Of course, I find it hard to really grasp the full concept by simply reading the book and I have been searching for some video of Stan demonstrating his chipping and pitching techniques. For those of you that have read the book or have taken short game lessons utilizing Utley's techniques, what are your thoughts?

Posted
I just finished reading Stan Utley's "The Art of the Short Game" and was curious if any other have read it. I liked the fact that his technique for chips and pitchs was basically a mini full swing. Of course, I find it hard to really grasp the full concept by simply reading the book and I have been searching for some video of Stan demonstrating his chipping and pitching techniques. For those of you that have read the book or have taken short game lessons utilizing Utley's techniques, what are your thoughts?

I like the techniques and the explanations. I'm in the middle of putting them into practice, and my pitching and chipping seem to have improved. My sand play has gotten much better. I'm having trouble implementing the putting technique, but I'm trying.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I like the techniques and the explanations. I'm in the middle of putting them into practice, and my pitching and chipping seem to have improved. My sand play has gotten much better. I'm having trouble implementing the putting technique, but I'm trying.

I skipped the chapter on sand play b/c that is one of my strong suits and I didnt want any new ideas to creep into my swing. I didnt like the putting book at all but I like the chipping and pitching techniques. Did you get the idea that is was a handsy motion(ex "the grip end of the club barely moves") or did I misinterpret?


Posted
I've read both books and found them helpful. It particularly helped me in the sand, which is my weak spot. The idea behind the putting stroke is not unlike the stroke Scotty Cameron promotes and is behind the development of the Detour putters.

Posted
I skipped the chapter on sand play b/c that is one of my strong suits and I didnt want any new ideas to creep into my swing. I didnt like the putting book at all but I like the chipping and pitching techniques. Did you get the idea that is was a handsy motion(ex "the grip end of the club barely moves") or did I misinterpret?

Sand play was a weak point for me, so I read that one first. Since then, I've had more sand saves than non-sand saves when dealing with a greenside bunker. I even holed out one. So I'm sold on his sand play.

As for the putting, I've been interpreting it as a handsy motion. Maybe we need to form a Utley-study group and figure it out.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't think he's promoting a handsey motion as much as he believes the putterhead path should be inside to square to inside. This motion can be done by turning the shoulders and keeping the hands reasonably quiet. He feels this is a more natural approach to putting and like a mini-swing. This is different than the Dave Pelz method of straight back and straight through. I find that if I try the straight back method that I have to manipulate my hands to keep the putterhead square, and that pulls my arms away from my body.

Posted
I've read bits and pieces on the book. The chips and pitches like a mini-swing is something that I always believed anyway. His putting philosophy I eschew since I'm a firm believer that it's straight back and straight thru. Anything else is just making things more complicated timing wise.




3Jack

Posted
I don't think his chipping or pitching style is handsy, either, since he strongly promotes the use of pivoting the lower body to regulate the speed. Like all the good short game books, he completely stesses not to use the hands to flip or scoop at impact.

On the topic of the grip not moving much for a chip, his backswing is getting the club and hands into a good impact position. Cupped right wrist, hands ready to be ahead at impact, good lag, etc. Then on the downswing, the entire club is swung around to the left. Look at the color panes for the chip -- #4 is the top of the backswing and his hands are still next to his back leg. #5 is the first downswing position, and his hands have moved to be next to his front leg. #6 at just past impact, they have moved around the body.

The hands not moving are just to put his hands into the same position they would be on at that time for a full swing. Just like he talks about the chip being just the bottom of the arc of a full swing.

Posted
As for the putting, I've been interpreting it as a handsy motion. Maybe we need to form a Utley-study group and figure it out.

I read Utley's putting book. I have a hard time figuring out how to keep the grip end of the club quiet and

not be handsy, i.e. breaking my wrists. What seems to work for me is I am focusing on the hinging of the elbos. My stroke feels most natural when I allow my right elbo to hinge on the backswing and my left elbo hinges on the downswing. I have more hand movement than Utely but less wrist movement than what I see in his photos. I have decided that putting is a thing of personal preference. I can't completely mimic Utley's putting stroke but I have adopted many fundamentals from him. I'm also having a hard time keeping my back straight while bending at the waist. I think I need a longer shaft on my putter.

Driver: 454 Comp 10.5* Stiff
3-Wood: Warbird Strong 3 Stiff
Irons: I10, 3-PW, white dot, stiff
Wedges: Tour-W 54/14 and 60/10
Putter: Anser 2Ball: Pro-V1


Posted
I read Utley's putting book. I have a hard time figuring out how to keep the grip end of the club quiet and

I had the same problem but I realized the answer. You need the forward press that Utley has (Pg 24). The forward press allows you to move the clubhead back without swinging the grip end much. If you keep your wrist angles intact and swing the clubhead end, you'll see what Utley is talking about. I don't think the stroke Utley teaches feels handsy. Once you got the forward press, you'll see how natural it feels. Hope this helps...


Posted
I had the same problem but I realized the answer. You need the forward press that Utley has (Pg 24). The forward press allows you to move the clubhead back without swinging the grip end much. If you keep your wrist angles intact and swing the clubhead end, you'll see what Utley is talking about. I don't think the stroke Utley teaches feels handsy. Once you got the forward press, you'll see how natural it feels. Hope this helps...

Thanks for the tip! I'll check it out this weekend

Driver: 454 Comp 10.5* Stiff
3-Wood: Warbird Strong 3 Stiff
Irons: I10, 3-PW, white dot, stiff
Wedges: Tour-W 54/14 and 60/10
Putter: Anser 2Ball: Pro-V1


  • 3 months later...
Posted
Only problem I'm having is chipping with a 58*. Direction is good, but can't get used to poping up my chip shots with that much loft.

Driver F/Speed 9.5
3 Wood F/Speed
5 Wood: F-50
Hybrids 3&4 Cobra
Irons MX-23 5i-PW Wedge52* and 58* Mizuno MP Putter:Rife Barbados  Ball: Bridgstone E6+


Posted
I think the problem with the Utley books is the potential for the beginner to exagerrate the technique. I read the books, didn't think much of them, but then had a beginner friend read the books and he really screwed himself up. He was pivoting on his putts so much that there was no way he could return the face to square, missing everything right. His chips were even worse. He really takes it inside on his swing (stack and tilt style), and was trying to do that on his short shots. He would have his hands behind his backside on his takeaway and then whip the club around trying to return it to square (as a mini swing). Terrible, terrible, terrible results. Couldn't get his chips/pitches airborn.

I think Utley tried to make too big a deal about the distinction between his technique and other taught methods (not that I blame him, he is trying to show what distinguishes his approach), but it caused a beginner to exagerrate the slight deviations and make hitting the ball very difficult.

What's in the bag
Driver: FTI
3W: 15 Degree
2H: X
4I-7I: X-188I, 9I, PW: X-Forged52 Deg: Vokey Oil Can, all rusted out56 Deg: Vokey, Chrome 60 Deg: Black PearlPutter: Catalina Two


Posted
I like his technique. I'm putting better and my pitching has improved, but having trouble with the trajectory of my chip shots.

Driver F/Speed 9.5
3 Wood F/Speed
5 Wood: F-50
Hybrids 3&4 Cobra
Irons MX-23 5i-PW Wedge52* and 58* Mizuno MP Putter:Rife Barbados  Ball: Bridgstone E6+


  • 2 weeks later...
  • Administrator
Posted
I didnt like the putting book at all but I like the chipping and pitching techniques. Did you get the idea that is was a handsy motion(ex "the grip end of the club barely moves") or did I misinterpret?

I got that impression as well, and I didn't like putting the putter grip across my lifelines. I like it, like with my other clubs, in my finger tips more. I know he still gets his fingertips on the grip, but I felt his motion was a bit more wristy than I like. I like to rock the shoulders - it's still an arc, but my hands are pretty still and the grip seems to move more than he likes. I find my distance control is just fine, and switching to his style might hinder that.

But putting, unlike most other parts of the short game, is pretty personal, and so long as you can repeat your stroke, it's really all about "whatever works."
I don't think he's promoting a handsey motion as much as he believes the putterhead path should be inside to square to inside.

He does believe inside-square-inside, but I don't think that's at the exclusion of being a bit more "wristy."

His putting philosophy I eschew since I'm a firm believer that it's straight back and straight thru. Anything else is just making things more complicated timing wise.

I disagree. I think if you have to manipulate the clubface in order to keep it square, that requires more timing than simply rocking the shoulders and letting the putter open and close naturally.

I've read his putting book, but I'm just now reading (tonight) his short game book. Looking forward to it. I've relied for a long time - too long - on my own feel and the mechanics I kind of make up as I go. Yeah, it worked for Seve, but I am not Seve. I get by okay, but I'd like to eliminate the occasional horrible short game shot I tend to hit.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Has anyone mastered his sand technique? Especially for high shots? I am getting out of the sand with a repeatable but very low flying shot. I am really struggling to get the ball higher. I want to continue with his method though because the sand shots feel so smooth. Compared to the standard open stance method, I feel there is less guess work on how hard to swing etc.

By the way, I am using a 60* Cleveland CG10 with pretty low bounce.

R7 TP 8.5* Fuji Speeder x-stiff (heavy,low,fade set)
975F 3W 13.5*
FX Tour Grind Nickel 3-PW +1/2", Rifle 6.5
Vokey SW 52*
CG10 LW 60* 3 dot (14* bounce) Tracy putter 35" (hit R but putt L)+ 1 club TBD...Past home courses: Unicorn GC (Stoneham, MA), Forest Creek GC (Round Rock, TX)Ball: Use...


  • 5 months later...
Posted
I found some video on You Tube showing Stan demonstrating his techniques. Definetely helps to "see it". Stan has made me a better putter and chipper.
Note: This thread is 6026 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.