Jump to content
IGNORED

Fundamental Question


traviswise
Note: This thread is 5644 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Here is the situation. I am a chronic slicer/fader. I have been working on several things and tonight I found something that seemed to work for me and my swing. In lieu of placing the ball further back in my stance I actually had straighter ball flight if I placed the ball closer to my toes instead of the inside of my heel (w/driver) and just inside my heel for my iron shots. It seems as though my timing for getting the club back square is just slower than most. So the further ahead the ball, the more closed the face at impact.

My general question is, is there anything fundamentally wrong or is the something that I am ok with repeating and incorporating into my swing?

What's in my Bagboy Revolver cart bag:

Polarity MTR Irons 2&3 (hybrid) thru PW
R7 Burner Draw Driver 460cc
R7 Burner 3 Wood 5614 Vokey Wedge Tour Chrome Studio Select 1.5 ProV1's

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Makes sense to me. The club goes up and down and around the body during a swing. Each person's swing is different I know. But at some point during the downswing the face is open, then square, then closed. Sounds like you found the square place for your swing. Kudos!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Here is the situation. I am a chronic slicer/fader. I have been working on several things and tonight I found something that seemed to work for me and my swing. In lieu of placing the ball further back in my stance I actually had straighter ball flight if I placed the ball closer to my toes instead of the inside of my heel (w/driver) and just inside my heel for my iron shots. It seems as though my timing for getting the club back square is just slower than most. So the further ahead the ball, the more closed the face at impact.

Funny you should say that: If I am reading what you say correctly, then I do the same thing. In fact, so does Ben Hogan. The following link contains a diagram for ball position that also appears in Hogan's book. Note that the ball position and left foot aren't changing, but his distance from the ball and right foot placement is. Hogan Ball Position Now, Hogan wasn't famous for fighting a slice/fade, but I find it hard to argue with his fundamentals.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I guess a simple answer to your question is yes, it is fundamentally wrong. But that doesn't necessarily mean it won't work. This past year I played with a guy that no kidding put the ball at least 6 inches past his front toe on the target side. No, he wasn't very good. I guess he just couldn't figure it out but it is what made him feel comfortable. If you somehow have an address and posture that causes your swing to bottom out further up in the swing and you consistently bottom out there I see no reason not to move the ball there? The alternative would be to change posture, alignment and the width of your feet. Do you swing with an open stance?

My Clubs
Nicklaus Progressive XC Irons: 3H,4H, 5-GW
Ray Cook SW & Gyro 1 Putter
Taylor Made Burner Driver 10.5
Taylor Made V-Steel 3 & 5 MetalsMy Home Course: Indian RiverMy Blog: Rant-o-Rama-Ding-Dong

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have taken a lesson and the instructor told me that my left shoulder at address is slightly open at address. If I try and square it around it makes my torso twist to a position that feels absolutely un-natural. I think the placement of the ball further to the front actually promotes more release of the club and hence a more square impact.

What's in my Bagboy Revolver cart bag:

Polarity MTR Irons 2&3 (hybrid) thru PW
R7 Burner Draw Driver 460cc
R7 Burner 3 Wood 5614 Vokey Wedge Tour Chrome Studio Select 1.5 ProV1's

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I am a slicer a well so i might try out what your saying when i g to the range tomorrow

In my ozone bag:

905r 10.5 Graphite Design YS-6+ R
909 F2 15.5 Aldila VooDoo Fairway S
Benross VeloCT Resuce 21 Grafalloy ProLaunch Platinum R MX300s 4-PW KBS Tour S MP-T10 50/8 Chrome 54/11 and 60/7 Studio Select Newport II 35"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I am a slicer a well so i might try out what your saying when i g to the range tomorrow

I find it absolutely crazy that here in America they call football "a game of inches", when golf is by far more incremental (sp) than any other sport I know of.

What's in my Bagboy Revolver cart bag:

Polarity MTR Irons 2&3 (hybrid) thru PW
R7 Burner Draw Driver 460cc
R7 Burner 3 Wood 5614 Vokey Wedge Tour Chrome Studio Select 1.5 ProV1's

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have taken a lesson and the instructor told me that my left shoulder at address is slightly open at address. If I try and square it around it makes my torso twist to a position that feels absolutely un-natural. I think the placement of the ball further to the front actually promotes more release of the club and hence a more square impact.

You open the front shoulder because you reach forward and down to put your right hand on the club handle at address and because the right hand is lower on the club handle. If you were to let your torso tilt back slightly and reach down to the club with out moving your shoulder forward the shoulder would be more square. Without a club, get into an address position and let your arms hang straight down palms facing. Now just tilt your back shoulder straight back which should lower the right hand below the left. That is what you have to do to keep the shoulders square and still put the hands on the club.

My Clubs
Nicklaus Progressive XC Irons: 3H,4H, 5-GW
Ray Cook SW & Gyro 1 Putter
Taylor Made Burner Driver 10.5
Taylor Made V-Steel 3 & 5 MetalsMy Home Course: Indian RiverMy Blog: Rant-o-Rama-Ding-Dong

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That is very true, I have recently incorporated that spine tilt into my swing and it has helped with contact, but as far as straight shots and reducing my natural fade, having the ball on my left foot's big toe seems to work.

*of course as any golfer knows this all could change the next time I play (damn golf)

What's in my Bagboy Revolver cart bag:

Polarity MTR Irons 2&3 (hybrid) thru PW
R7 Burner Draw Driver 460cc
R7 Burner 3 Wood 5614 Vokey Wedge Tour Chrome Studio Select 1.5 ProV1's

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5644 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I honestly believe if they play longer tees by 300-400 yards, closer to or over 7,000 yards, more rough, tougher greens, women's golf will become much more gripping.  BTW, if it weren't for Scottie killing it right now, men's golf isn't exactly compelling.
    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...