Jump to content
IGNORED

Iron Advice: 735, 755, lt2, Mp60


Note: This thread is 6483 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hello guys, i am new to the forum, but find it very informative. I used to play alot of golf growing up as a kid, but gave it up my last two years of high school playing football, and played off and on through college, well im out of college and got back to playing and i am in the market for a new set of irons. i plan on traveling up to a shop and trying several sets, i plan on hitting the titleist 735cm and 755 when available with the taylor made rac lt2 and mizunos mp60s. i can pick up a set of stainless 735s for a great deal, only 6 iron has been hit.

i am working on improving my game and get better every day. i think i shot 21 over on my first 18 holes played in 4 years. i see myself shooting in the low to mid 80s within the next month i just need to get rid of those stupid mistakes and blow up holes, but i want a new set of irons, naturally i need to hit them and see what i like, should i try any other ones? i am looking for a set i can grow into that maybe later will allow me to work the ball more now, but still has a bit of forginess built in, i have been hitting some 845 tommy aromor silver scots lately and hit them well, not sure how they stack up to the newer irons, anyone hit them and have any feedback? its just a good hours drive to a place that has a good selection, i have been researching alot here and reading reviews, thanks for any advice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


There's not a lot we can tell you. You need to pick what you'll like, but I suggest that you visit a pro and get some lessons as a tune-up. He'll check your grip, setup, and aim, along with your swing. After that, I think you should think again about your new irons.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


welcome back to the game... ok now just to let you know I'm a Titleist guy so I'll throw in my two cents about those clubs. For one it all depends on how you look at your overall ability and also your rate of improvement. If you think mid 80's range is likely your best golf then the 755 will be an ideal club... its hard to say because those scores are on the cusp... the 755 is definately going to give you a little more forgiveness with the same nice feel... the only downfall with the 755 is their stock shaft as Titty is trying to use their own shaft (for some stupid reason) so price up and get back into at least a DG or something else depending on what feels nice...just get fitted and demo the hell out of some clubs

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


my main problem is that my local course has very very limited selection maybe 3 sets or so, so i either have to go up to edwin watts or the world golf village to try different. so i want to get alot of info before making the drive. i think i could probably go lower than 80, just depends on how much i practice and play, when i was a teenager i could shoot in the low 80s and now i am alot stronger and carry more distance, i am leaning towards the 735s or mizunos. i am thinking i am going to spring for maybe 5 or a 10 lesson pack over at the pga academy at the world golf village, i am sure they have the latest sticks and can help me make the right decison
Link to comment
Share on other sites


One thing I would say is don't limit yourself to certain clubs/manufacturers.

Go with an open mind and try as many as you can. Along with those mentioned the Bridgestone J33's are also great clubs, and would definately suit a "better" player, so if it's something you want to grow into they may well do the trick.

The LT2's are ok, for me they didn't quite give the feedback that a quality forged iron would (for obvious reasons), so if it was me I'd stick to forged and try the relevant clubs:

MP60, J33 (both sets), X Tour, Titleist (not sure what the models are), Cleveland CG4 Tour (not forged, but very nice feel and feedback).
In the bag:
Driver - FT-i 9.5* Neutral Speeder 686 Stiff
Fairway Wood - X-Tour 15* Stiff
Hybrid - Nickent 3DX Ironwood 17* Aldila NV Hybrid 75S
Irons - Tour Stage Z101 Forged Irons DG S300 Shatfs (2-PW) Wedges - 52* Callaway X Tour Vintage, 58* Callaway X Tour Mack Daddy VintagePutter - Scotty...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


You definately need to go with what feels best in your hand. Each of the brands you are considering all have a unique feel to them, and you will be best with whichever one you feel most comfortbable. I play only Titleist so I would say choose them, but its all on the feel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6483 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...