Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4199 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just curious if anyone swapped out for this shaft?  I just had a couple reshafted to test out tomorrow.  I thought they were regular but looks like perhaps stiff.  It's hard to tell the flex..it looks like an "S" but cannot tell..but it feels like a regular too..more whippy.


Posted

Is this the flex indicator..stiff?  In some other pictures I've seen the "R" right underneath the "950GH"..this doesn't have it.  I would think it would have "S" there.


  • Moderator
Posted

I have them in my Mizuno MP57 irons.  I like them a lot.  I have the stiff, which is somewhere between the R300 and S300 Dynamic Gold.  I switched out of the R300 to this after a fitting with a top notch fitter.  He said the regular 950 is less stiff than and R300 so he recommended stiff for my swing speed 80 - 83 with a 6 iron.  They are light but feel very nice.

I bought a few Mizuno demo clubs cheap that had DGSL R300 and S300 and DG S300 to compare too ($5 each from a store going out of business).  I also got a Project X 5.5 to compare to.  I like the NS 950 as well as any of the others.  Launch is mid and the feel is smooth. The Project X was a bit harsh.  The DGSL is nice too, but lower launching.

I think you are taking the right approach and trying just a couple of clubs first.

Let us know what you think.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks, yes..it seems the stiff is less stiff than the DG XP S300 (using Mizuno MX 300)..which is what I want.  I haven't gone to the range yet (going after work), but from swinging it yesterday and waggling it, it feels more flexible than the XP S300 for sure..and lighter too..which was my main reason..can't wait to give them a go.


Posted

I tried the Nike NS Pro 950 GH (S flex) in a set of Nike VR-S Forged irons at a golf demo day. I went from stiff to regular shafts four years ago, but had no trouble handling the 950 Stiff. Remember that the 950 Stiff weighs 98 grams, which is less than the DG S300 Superlight at 106 grams.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by WUTiger

I tried the Nike NS Pro 950 GH (S flex) in a set of Nike VR-S Forged irons at a golf demo day. I went from stiff to regular shafts four years ago, but had no trouble handling the 950 Stiff. Remember that the 950 Stiff weighs 98 grams, which is less than the DG S300 Superlight at 106 grams.

Yep..and much less than the DGXP S300 (what I "was" using) at 117g.


Posted
Originally Posted by Maverick

Is this the flex indicator..stiff?  In some other pictures I've seen the "R" right underneath the "950GH"..this doesn't have it.  I would think it would have "S" there.

Okay, looks like this is NOT the flex indicator but a mark that Nippon uses as a trademark.  I emailed Shaftology and got this response from them:

"Regarding the question of flex labeling. Most of our models are labeled as "S Flex", or "R Flex". However, the 950GH model was originally produced without any flex labeling, except on the butt end of the shaft, at the grip portion of the shaft model. Some of our customers prefer the NS PRO 950GH model without the flex designation, so some 950GH models have the flex label and some do not.
Also, do not confuse the markings of "for shaft" as a flex designation. T his marking actually reads "SG is For Shaft", which is an industry grade mark in Japan, similar to our "UL Listed" for many electrical products. "
I called the guy who did the install and he said they were "regular" and it was stamped on the butt end.  I got to hit them today and they feel really nice with a higher trajectory which I was looking for.

  • Moderator
Posted

I looked at mine and it is the same.  I know they are stiff flex but my label looks just like yours.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by boogielicious

I looked at mine and it is the same.  I know they are stiff flex but my label looks just like yours.

Just came back from the shop, yes, I confirmed that "older" Nippon shafts did not carry the generic flex marker like other companies (2009).  I saw the same (newer) Nippon 950GH, dated 2011, and it had the "R" designation for REGULAR underneath the screened shaft label.  The true designation was on the butt end of the where it is printed "R" or "S".


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Finally getting used to the new shafts and they are awesome.  It's so much more fun when you're not struggling/fighting with your irons.  It's so much nicer when I don't have to struggle to keep the head speed up..I feel like a big weight has been taken off of me.


  • 1 year later...
Posted
I had NS Pro950GH (S) put in my new Speedblades. I had them soft-stepped once, but although I can control a fadt swing on my driver, making consistently solid contact with irons when swinging hard was difficult for me. So I switched to the 950GH HT (High Teajectory) (R) shafts hard-stepped once. There is just no comparison. Slowing down my swing is allowing me to make solid contact and my ball flight is, well, maybe a wee bit too high, but it is greatly limiting roll. Once I get my yardages dialed in, they'll be perfect.

Note: This thread is 4199 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.