Jump to content
IGNORED

SwingWeight


Note: This thread is 3945 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

An interesting topic i think. I was trying to figure out a way to measure the swing weight of my clubs, with out a meter. Being from an engineering background. A swingweight meter is just a measurement of weight on the butt end of the club when the club is not balanced at a 14" (or 12") focal point.

D-0 is basically when there is no weight measurement reading, or when its balanced.

so using math and physics, i found that if you measure the focal point of the club, balance point. You now have were all the weight of club acts upon in on location. Knowing this, you can simplify the equation, not having to measure any of the club components. Its nearly impossible to measure clubhead weight when its stuck on a club :p

Lets go with measuring weight in ounces, and focal point in inches.

Wt = total weight of club

Fp = distance from butt end to balance point

Swing Weight = ( Wt x (Fp - 14) - 213.25 ) / 1.75

So all you need to do is measure the balance point, which i do with a engineering ruler (its a three prong ruler, so it can be multitasked to measure length and act as a fulcrum)

The tricky part is, ok, so now what do you do when you want to add weight to the club. This gets tricky because the balance point shifts. But its still a nice math problem. Taking the moment around the new focal point, assuming that the weight is added to the clubhead.

Wc = Weight added

Fd = distance from butt of club the weight was added.

Change in Swing Weight = Wc x (Fd) - (Wc x 14) = 1.75 * ▲SW

or

1.75 x ▲SW = Wc x (Fd - 14)

Which makes sense. If you put weight at the butt end, Fd = 0, so all that weight acts on the scale at 14" from the focal point.

Of course the math works the same for a 12" scale

1.75 x ▲SW = Wc x (Fd - 12)

People might wonder, what about club length, that is taken care of in the total weight of the club. Since the original weight is a constant, and cancels out, the only thing that matters is the weight added and were at on the club.

So the process would be,

Lets say you take a 35.5" club, Weights 16.5 oz club, Fp = 27.24", that means its roughly a swing weight of 3

Lets say you want to take it up to a swing weight of 6

so that's a change 3, lets say you want to add it all to the clubhead, with some lead tape. That will be roughly 35.25" from the butt of the club.

So

1.75 x (3) = Wc x (35.25 - 14)

Means, the weight you need to add to the end of the club will be 0.245 ounces, or 7 grams of lead tape.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Its basically the method i said,

Quote:

Having covered that caveat, here's the method. ( My thanks to Rich G. Ciccotti for pointing out this method from Ralph Maltby's book. )

  1. Measure the distance of the balance point of the club from the end of the grip (in inches).
  2. Subtract 14" from the result, and multiply it by the club's total weight in ounces or grams.
  3. The result is the torque (in inch-grams or inch-ounces) about an axis 14" from the butt, the base definition of swingweight.
  4. Use the following table to convert to the swingweight point scale:

SW = Wt x (Fp - 14)

D-0 = 213.5 (i messed up with 213.25, typo

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3945 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
    • Once again… it's easier to be "consistent" when you're playing against weaker competition. Despite playing against significantly stronger/deeper fields, Jack was nowhere near as dominant as Tiger Woods was. Jack's "consistency" is a lame way of saying "I like Jack and I want to vote for him as GOAT but I can't come up with a real reason why, so I'll just say he was more 'consistent.'" If someone joined the PGA Tour, kinda muddled around for a year or two, then won 16 majors and 75 total PGA Tour events in eight years, then promptly retired… He'd almost surely have my vote for GOAT. Consistency schmonsistency.
    • Maybe not just the 18 & 15 angle though. Jack's consistency over a long period of time is pretty incredible. Kind of mindblowing to look at his total number of Top 5 finishes in the majors. 
    • Sweet! Wordle 1,056 3/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟨 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...