Jump to content
IGNORED

Why do iron loft gaps change?


Note: This thread is 3393 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Just wondering why the loft gap between iron lofts changes? For example, my set of MP-58s have 3* of loft between each of the longer irons (3-4-5) and the shorter irons (5-6-7-8-9-p) have 4* of loft between each iron.

Why do manufacturers do this?

Why does the loft gap change between the 5 and 6 irons for some sets and between the 6 and 7 on others?

Would it be a bad idea to have them all with 4* gaps (3-P)? I feel my distance gaps start to get too close between the 4 and 5 iron, so i think I could use an extra degree of loft difference. (don't game the 3)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Why they gap them 3* then 4* is based on getting the most performance out of the club.  The 3* at the top creates better gapping throughout the set.  Some companies are even adding length in order to increase the ball speed for better gapping.

Where each company makes the change is based on R&D.;  Each club head will have a different center of gravity, therefore launch and spin differently.  Also it is dependent on the type of club.  A more forgiving set or game improvement would be likely to have 3* gapping deeper into the set to help a higher handicap player play better golf.

A lot of "better" players will request 4* gapping on their sets.  If you research some older club specs you will find that 4* was the norm for quite some time.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why they gap them 3* then 4* is based on getting the most performance out of the club.  The 3* at the top creates better gapping throughout the set.  Some companies are even adding length in order to increase the ball speed for better gapping.

Where each company makes the change is based on R&D.;  Each club head will have a different center of gravity, therefore launch and spin differently.  Also it is dependent on the type of club.  A more forgiving set or game improvement would be likely to have 3* gapping deeper into the set to help a higher handicap player play better golf.

A lot of "better" players will request 4* gapping on their sets.  If you research some older club specs you will find that 4* was the norm for quite some time.

Thanks for the response.

Why does a gap of 3* create better gaps at the top?

Why do some "better" players request 4* loft gaps all the way through?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Stock shaft length can vary between clubs too, longer length between clubs in long irons going to .5" between around the 7 iron. That is usually where the sets start going from 3* to 4 or 5*. Wedges are often .25" between.

@WUTiger will have a better answer.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Current loft gapping has little to do with performance. The short iron lofts are so jacked up that the longer irons need to be more closely gapped for the 3 iron to have enough loft to be hittable for the average golfer. That way they can still try to sell you a set of 8 irons.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why they gap them 3* then 4* is based on getting the most performance out of the club.  The 3* at the top creates better gapping throughout the set.  Some companies are even adding length in order to increase the ball speed for better gapping. ...

A lot of "better" players will request 4* gapping on their sets.  If you research some older club specs you will find that 4* was the norm for quite some time.

Current loft gapping has little to do with performance. The short iron lofts are so jacked up that the longer irons need to be more closely gapped for the 3 iron to have enough loft to be hittable for the average golfer. That way they can still try to sell you a set of 8 irons.

Rob and Savvy have captured what the problem is.

A couple of years ago, I suggested that players keep the uniform gaps at the long end by:

  • maintaining 4* loft differences;
  • dropping either the 4i or 5i out of their set; and
  • going to .75" shaft length difference in the longer clubs  you keep.

For the average reasonably dedicated golfer, the consistent yardage gaps would be of more valuable from 150 yards on end than in the longer clubs.

For 3i, 4i and 5i, club designer Tom Wishon suggests that 5* loft differences would benefit the average golfer more than 3* gaps. The 5* loft gaps would help the average golfer get the ball up better and keep more consistent yardage gaps at the long end.

Below, Wishon gives details on what's at play:

Re: Loft Progressions

Post by TWW » Thu Mar 13, 2014 3:44 pm

Kelly Cochrane wrote:Why is there less loft difference between the long irons? Is there a design function/rationale for this? That is, why is there only 3* difference between the 3- and 4-irons, and 4- and 5-irons, and then there is 4* between each of the other irons (as a "rule")? Assuming a properly struck ball, doesn't that create a larger distance gap between the longer irons? Why not just have a consistent loft progression?

If there was 4* between each club, the set would progress from a 20* 3-iron to a 60* LW with a consistent loft progression (this build assumes a consistent progression in your club lengths all the way through the set). Or, considering that people have difficulty with a 20* iron (ahem, 765 WS 20* 4-iron), you could begin at 21* and just have 3 degrees between your AW and SW.

Does the decision about loft progression have anything to do with the playability, or is this a marketing/market-perception driven decision?



The 3* separation between long irons today is unfortunately and sadly a marketing/market perception driven decision. it is forced by the fact that the companies have been lowering the lofts so much over the past 20+ yrs that they now are at a point that they know they cannot possibly keep a 4* loft gap between all the irons or the 3 iron would literally be unhittable for anyone but a tour pro.

So in order to keep making the 7, 8, 9, PW lower in loft to allow ANY golfer to hit these irons longer and want to buy the set, the lofts on the lower end have to be compressed more together to 3* and with some companies you see 2* or 2.5* between the 3 and 4 irons. This continued loft shrinking is now forcing a 5* loft spacing between the higher numbered irons - without that 5* spacing between the 8 to 9 to PW to AW, then you would be forced to have yet another wedge before the Sand wedge.

In truth, from a pure performance standpoint, loft spacings between the low loft side of the set should be 5* to deliver the same exact distance gap between low loft irons as you get from a 4* spacing between higher loft irons. This is because plain and simple, for most golfers at lofts under 25*, it is just too difficult to get the ball well UP to fly its maximum distance for the ball speeds generated by normal golfers.

This matter of the lofts today is really not a good thing at all, not for the golfers, and not for companies that want to do the most to help golfers. I know for sure that I would love to design my iron sets so there could be 5* spacing between the 3 to 4 and 4 to 5, then 4* spacing between irons the rest of the way. But if I try to do that, there is not a good way to get the lofts on the 7, 8, 9, PW as strong as they need to be to be sure our sets could stack up for distance against most of the big company's sets.

It really is a crappy situation.

However, the SOLUTION to it is simply to fit as many regular golfers as you can into iron sets in which their 3, 4 and even the 5 are hybrids, and then only the 6 to wedges are irons. If they are even slower in clubhead speed, do the hybrids through the 6 and start the irons at the #7. Doing that helps the golfer immensely because the hybrid will always be easy to get up in the air to fly a max distance for any given ball speed due to the hybrid's lower AND more rear located CG. With those flight enhancing CG situations in the hybrid, this also allows launch angle and carry to usually be close enough to perfect for most golfers that a 3* spacing between the hybrid lofts works out better for an actual distance difference than a 3* spacing in loft ever could be in normal long irons.

TOM

http://wishongolf.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t;=12946

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Big reason most guys I know don't have irons longer than 5, because it's really a 3.5 iron. In my iron set the 3 is 19 degrees. I don't have a use for it.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for info guys!

I have been doing a lot of research myself since I started this thread and I have found Tom Wishons thought to make the most sense to me.

I'm thinking that 4* gaps between all my irons would help my distance gap problem. So it would a 4i at 24* with a PW at 48*. I think that should help my gaps.

I know most would suggest swapping my 4i for a 4hybrid but i feel much better with an iron. After the 24* 4i I will go to my 20*hybrid then my 3 wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I believe most golfers would do better following Wishon methodologies. May I suggest as you become advanced in your fitting knowledge I would encourage learning about additional measurements that can contribute to your iron gapping. For example, on paper based on just swing speed and spin rates I could justify hitting a 15 deg lofted 3 wood. However, due to my AOA, early-mid release,  a 17 deg loft with + 1/2" length but flat lie angle is my best long wood for hitting off the deck consistently. I mention this because many times we golfers set ourselves with loft gapping for irons but neglect the fairwood/hybrids, etc. I agree with one poster regarding the "jacked up lofts" in shorter irons yielding closer spacing on long irons. In my case, there was more to just properly gapping my irons, it literally was the whole bag of clubs. Just wanted to share this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I believe most golfers would do better following Wishon methodologies. May I suggest as you become advanced in your fitting knowledge I would encourage learning about additional measurements that can contribute to your iron gapping. For example, on paper based on just swing speed and spin rates I could justify hitting a 15 deg lofted 3 wood. However, due to my AOA, early-mid release,  a 17 deg loft with + 1/2" length but flat lie angle is my best long wood for hitting off the deck consistently. I mention this because many times we golfers set ourselves with loft gapping for irons but neglect the fairwood/hybrids, etc. I agree with one poster regarding the "jacked up lofts" in shorter irons yielding closer spacing on long irons. In my case, there was more to just properly gapping my irons, it literally was the whole bag of clubs. Just wanted to share this.

Totally agree and thanks for ideas. I think Wishon has some very good ideas about setting up your equipment so it works well for you and your ability level even if it means you won't be reaching par 5s in two.

My next objective is to try and figure out my hybrids/woods like you said. Currently I was thinking of carrying a 20.5* 910h and a 16.5* 910f thinking that those would give me some pretty good gaps. However I will have to wait to check my gaps with my new iron lofts.

My other option would be to carry a 21* 7 wood and an 18* or 17* 4/5 wood.

I don't really enjoy hitting hybrids or woods that much and I can't really tell which I hit better since I rarely pull them out of the bag to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I assume also that shafts must make a difference. I'd generally say my gaps on irons are around 10 yards from GW to 5 iron. This is with generally 4° gaps. There is then a 3° gap from 42 gw to a Tom Watson gw which gives a 15 yard gap (115 to 100 yard) and further 15 yard gaps between 56° sw (85 yards) and 60° lw (70 yards) - both Adams Tom Watson. I was told the wedges have a "wedge" flex shaft (whatever that means). So my irons are 10 yard gaps to 15 in the wedges for a 4° difference.


Callaway Big Bertha V Series 10.5 Driver stiff shaft
Benross Hot Speed 16 deg 3 fw
Callaway XR 22 deg hybrid
Callaway XR 25 deg hybrid
Callaway Big Bertha 6-pw
Callaway Mack Daddy 3 48/54/60 wedges
Odyssey White Hot Pro Havok

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I assume also that shafts must make a difference. I'd generally say my gaps on irons are around 10 yards from GW to 5 iron. ...

...I was told the wedges have a "wedge" flex shaft (whatever that means). ...

We had a thread on wedge shafting earlier this week:

http://thesandtrap.com/t/79217/do-wedge-shaft-flex-really-matter

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I never could figure out why OEM's would make a 4 iron and stamp the number 5 on it. Can someone explain this trend to me? I mean if it's got the loft of a 4 iron then stamp a number 4 on it for fock sake. Don't stamp a 5 and claim it has more distance then the competitor.....the again every company does it so.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dr Hook,

You were born 40 years too late. Club designer Tom Wishon mentioned your topic in his blog item on club mix (which 14 for your bag) and the why a 4H flies better than comparable 4i.

Wishon said that back in the 1970s, most OEM had pretty close to the same lofts on their irons and wedges. Then, the arms race in distance arrived. I have checked in the archives section of Ralph Maltby's Clubfitting and Repair book, and this is pretty much true.

Wishon said his fitters use the "24-38" rule in fitting irons: The average golfer has trouble hitting an iron that is lower than 24* loft, and longer than 38" (current standard for many 5 irons).

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Dr Hook,

You were born 40 years too late. Club designer Tom Wishon mentioned your topic in his blog item on club mix (which 14 for your bag) and the why a 4H flies better than comparable 4i.

Wishon said that back in the 1970s, most OEM had pretty close to the same lofts on their irons and wedges. Then, the arms race in distance arrived. I have checked in the archives section of Ralph Maltby's Clubfitting and Repair book, and this is pretty much true.

Wishon said his fitters use the "24-38" rule in fitting irons: The average golfer has trouble hitting an iron that is lower than 24* loft, and longer than 38" (current standard for many 5 irons).

Exactly. Well stated ^^^^^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I never could figure out why OEM's would make a 4 iron and stamp the number 5 on it. Can someone explain this trend to me? I mean if it's got the loft of a 4 iron then stamp a number 4 on it for fock sake. Don't stamp a 5 and claim it has more distance then the competitor.....the again every company does it so.....

Cause most people don't know that they are essentially hitting a 4 iron. They just know that they hit the demo 6 iron 10 yards longer than their old one so they buy a set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


A few decades back when perimeter weighted club head designs began to take hold (I.E Callaway Big Betha, King Cobras, etc) those club designers knew that while they increased the off-center strike performance that a side effect was very high launch angles/ball flight. Due to these higher launch designs the designers figured out that their new 4 iron for example actually flew as far or further than current/traditional 3 iron lofted irons. Thus the race began when one company marketed its new "stronger lofted" irons vs a company still using traditional lofted irons. These companies did not tell why their clubs were longer just that they were and golfers tested and confirmed. One example I remember is a King Cobra 5 iron flying as far as some companies 3-4 irons, etc. Was it apples to apples? No. But the marketing gurus convinced a generation to switch and either a company adapted or it lost sales. To further complicate things there is/was no official standard lofts for golf club irons as each company designs to its desire. Across the times there has been "generational" accepted lofts but not a locked down standard. For me, I learned that I needed to get fit and learn what launch rates, AOA, etc meant and that helped me figure my "personalized" standards for my irons based on my abilities. IF I demo a iron set today I know that the seven iron I am testing may be equal to my 6 iron or my 8 iron based on its specs and that helps more accurately compare/contrast brands of irons to what I play.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3393 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...