Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

knott's Stubborn Takes on Golf, Particularly Instruction


Note: This thread is 2047 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/20/2020 at 10:26 AM, knott said:

Yes no doubt. Sim max in 9 degrees is Fade biased though. I was hitting constant straight bombs when trying ut out hence it convinced me. Also wonder about the Aerodynamic shape of the underside of it and how it affects the club path. 

I usually do figure my gear out though. I am fascinated that lower handicappers dont believe they can figure out things on their own but I dont judge and particularly not on handicap. 

Hmmmm...I've played golf for 52 years....can't say I've met a 17 cap who hits CONSTANT STRAIGHT BOMBS.....I'm kinda thinking if one's swing is so tuned in to hit a driver like this.... then it generally should translate to other clubs too....therefore one would not  be a 17 cap because their swing is consistent to hit the ball well and and also score well too.

But because you seem to already the golf 'basics' figured out...I think you'll be ok...just sayin.😁 


Posted
1 hour ago, Bonvivant said:

Do you not have a smart phone? There are plenty of free apps that offer SG analysis. You are definitely taking the cake in the trolling department, or you are just at the very start of your Dunning-Kruger effect in golf. You may have been playing a long time, but I would bet you are the second dot, or close to it.

1*eqmrgQRb8YyqEPMUcZE3lA.png

 

We aren't aggressive, and your intuition is just "feel", which isn't real as you have probably heard lots since you've gotten here. If every post you make is " I know exactly all about golf and where I lose my strokes, and I don't need an instructor", you are going to continue to get pushback because everything you are saying is wrong and could misinform others that read it.

Everyone that replies to your post is trying to protect the unsuspecting from believing things that are objectively false. 17 handicap players need instructors, and don't know where they are losing strokes. If they did, they wouldn't be 17 handicaps, myself included.

 

Honestly I dont find it that complicated. Just hellishly hard to master. It´s a bit easier hit a football then a small golfball on a tiny rod.    Golf is quite a simple concept to grasp. Get the ball in the hole as fast as possible avoiding misshits and obstacle. But some make it way more complicated then it is!

What do you mean is false with you can learn and improve your golf on your own after learning the basics? It´s not false whatsoever!
Everything is not black or white but some people here discuss like there is one absolute truth.

Dunno if we need to go off topic on the instructor again. Some are fishing so hard for it though... There is a thread knotts stubborn take. Just don´t expect any responses though 😉


  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, knott said:

Honestly I dont find it that complicated.

You don’t know how little you know.

Nobody is fishing. They’re speaking from experience. 

 

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, knott said:

  Golf is quite a simple concept to grasp. Get the ball in the hole as fast as possible avoiding misshits and obstacle. But some make it way more complicated then it is!

Nobody here has said the concept of golf is complicated. Stacking six golf balls on top of each other is an easy concept, you just stack six balls on top of each other right?

Shooting a low score is very difficult in golf. What ‘low’ is can be a gray area for sure. People who strictly play for fun and don’t care about their score can’t really discuss the difficulty level. It’s like a poker player playing hold ‘em who doesn’t care if he loses then walks away saying it’s an easy game to learn.

I’m not sure why you think people are fishing or being aggressive. Why are you so resistant to learning something new? Why would stat keeping and taking lessons be such an awful thing for you? 
 

 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2047 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • You got that right. It is in favor of Tiger being more dominant and having a long career.  My math is correct. Tiger had 24 total seasons versus Jack's 26. People want to use longevity as a tie breaker, but they fail to realize that Tiger had a very long career as well. They just refuse to admit it, because people don't like to admit they are incorrect or have their opinions invalidated.  I did this on ChatGPT. I assumed 1.0 point for every non-major PGA tour win and 4 points for a major victory. Then I applied a 20% increase for Tiger due to tougher competition. I think 20% might not be conservative enough.  Yea, I think that looks about correct. 😊
    • The first ("don't do this") example looked oh-so-familiar for some reason. This should be very helpful.
    • Day 71 - 2026-03-03 Reviewed film and did some work outside at the net. Not thrilled with video review (comparison with stuff from ~2 weeks ago). Will get feedback from coach and review.
    • Day 518 - 2026-03-03 Mirror work today. Got our Radmor hoodies. If you'd like a Golf Evolution hoodie… let me know. 🙂 
    • I know what those are, and they were unofficial. They were mostly to create conversation… and promote Mark McCormack's own clients. What Matt said is correct: Tiger's career spanned 24 years. Regardless, 15 > 19 when factoring in the competition, and 82 >> 72 when doing so.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.