Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
So I recieved the Callaway magazine yesterday and was reading up on the I-MIX and I came to the conclusion that while it is a "revolutionary system"(their words), it seems like a novelty to me. I think that I would rather get fitted for the right club by profesionals than buying extra shafts and club heads to be able to tweak my driver by interchanging parts. From what I saw the clubheads are between 350-400 dollars and the shafts started at 150 and went up to 400 dollars. So basicly 500 dollars just to start, then it would get really expensive after adding more shafts and clubheadds. It seems this system would be good for fitting golfers for the right Callaway driver. Certainly seems geared towards the people who have enough money to afford multiple shafts and clubheads. Or is it just me?
My Bag

Driver: Sumo 460 10.5º Stiff
4 & 7 Woods: T-40 Stiff
Irons: Tight Lies GT 3-PWWedges: Tom Watson SignaturePutter: Daiwa DG-245Ball: One PlatinumGone Golfin'

Posted
Yes I think it is just another way for these companies to squeeze even more money out of us golfers.

I am sure it may be useful to some scratch golfers or even low handicappers, but I don't fit into either category.

I am not the slightest bit interested in this "gimmick". The last thing I want is to change my shaft all the time, put the wrong one on, change it again. Sounds like a bunch of hassle to me, not to mention it is just another thing that could break. I had a driver with a weight system, great idea but the weight inside broke off.
"When I play with him, he talks to me on every green. He turns to me and says, 'You're away.' "
-Jimmy Demaret referring to Ben Hogan

In The Bag:
Driver: Cleveland HiBore XL (10.5 -conforming)3 Wood: MacGregor V-FOIL5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001Irons: Ben Hogan BH-5 (4-PW)Wedges:52 - Nike SV Tour56 - Cleve...

Posted
I can think of one local course where I'd like to have a fade weighted club head on my driver shaft.

But for $450? No thanks.

IMO the iMix is going to be a dud.
In the bag

909D3 8.5 Matrix Ozik XCon 7 X
Burner TP 14.5 Fujikura RE*AX SF TP 75 X
Idea Pro 20 RP Project X 6.0 X-Tour (2005) 4-PW RP Project X 6.0 X-Tour Chrome Wedges 50 and 54 RP Project X 5.5 X-Tour Vintage 60 w/ PM grind Teryllium Ten Newport 2 34" ProV1X

Posted
it wont be that expensive after a year they will be showing up on ebay heads and shafts fo 300$

Burner 10.5* driver
Burner 3 wood GD Pershing Shaft
Burner 5 wood GD Pershing Shaft
Tour Burner irons
Rac black 52* Rac satin 60* Red x 3 pro v1


Posted
I can see this idea being advantageous to golfers at high levels who play a lot of national competitions (I play a lot of national Competitions, although not necessarily at a high level).
I think the I-Mix can only help your golf in two ways, hitting the ball higher, and hitting the ball lower. You simply need one club head, and two shafts, one which will launch the ball high (for your parkland courses) and one which will launch the ball low (for windy days and or links courses)

But I personally can not see your Joe-average mid to high handicap golfer finding the I-Mix system that useful.

My 2 cents.

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


  • Administrator
Posted
Haven't we had this discussion already?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Haven't we had this discussion already?

Sorry, I looked to see if this thread had started, guess I didn't look deep enough. Apologies for redundant thread

My Bag

Driver: Sumo 460 10.5º Stiff
4 & 7 Woods: T-40 Stiff
Irons: Tight Lies GT 3-PWWedges: Tom Watson SignaturePutter: Daiwa DG-245Ball: One PlatinumGone Golfin'

Posted
So I recieved the Callaway magazine yesterday and was reading up on the I-MIX and I came to the conclusion that while it is a "revolutionary system"(their words), it seems like a novelty to me. I think that I would rather get fitted for the right club by profesionals than buying extra shafts and club heads to be able to tweak my driver by interchanging parts. From what I saw the clubheads are between 350-400 dollars and the shafts started at 150 and went up to 400 dollars. So basicly 500 dollars just to start, then it would get really expensive after adding more shafts and clubheadds. It seems this system would be good for fitting golfers for the right Callaway driver. Certainly seems geared towards the people who have enough money to afford multiple shafts and clubheads. Or is it just me?

good call.

i dont think it will take off (even though anything super tech'y in golf these days usually does). It would work well for: - people who: A: want to keep the same head long enough so they can change the shaft according to conditions or their swing evolution etc and B: people who are happy with their shaft, but want to change heads often. - i think its great for club fitters! just my thoughts but the idea of changing heads and shafts so often just doesn't sit right with me. I see it more as a way to fitting your club/shaft, so you can get the correct one fitted
Driver: Callaway Diablo Edge Tour 10.5* (UST Proforce v2 77g X Flex) 3 Wood: Callaway Diablo 15* (UST Proforce v2 86g S Flex). 2 Hybrid: Adams A4 Tech 17* (UST Proforce v2 105g S Flex). 3 and 4 Hybrid: Adams Idea Pro 20* and 23* (UST Proforce v2 105g S Flex)
Irons: Tour Edge Exotics...

Posted
The I-MIX is that. It is a good marketing strategy by Callaway once again. Im a marketer. Callaway really impresses me with the way they sell innovations. Just think if scotty cameron had a face insert I-MIX for putters that you could add on different putter faces. I think that if he did-all the cameron loyalists would buy it and scotty would be a genious and the product would go crazy in the market

"People think the size of the head is most important. Wrong. It's getting a quality shaft. test different shafts to see which goes the straightest. Also, more degrees of loft on the head is better than less. Eleven degrees is about right."


Posted
Haven't we had this discussion already?

Maybe then, you should give us the link to the other thread

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


  • Administrator
Posted
The I-MIX is that. It is a good marketing strategy by Callaway once again. Im a marketer. Callaway really impresses me with the way they sell innovations. Just think if scotty cameron had a face insert I-MIX for putters that you could add on different putter faces. I think that if he did-all the cameron loyalists would buy it and scotty would be a genious and the product would go crazy in the market

Oh c'mon. Not only has that not happened (making this pretty pointless), but changing the face in a putter might actually be useful, while changing the shaft in a driver after it's been fitted to you is, more than likely, a bad thing. It raises the cost and adds confusion without doing much (if anything) to help consumers.

There's one good shaft for every player. Except under _extreme_ conditions, your best launch angle and spin are always your best launch angle and spin. It's marketing, as you said - it has little to no basis in actually helping golfers.
Maybe then, you should give us the link to the other thread

How about the original poster spend the effort rather than relying on others to do it for him?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.