Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1280 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello.  Was hoping that someone could tell me what kind of dci's are pictured below.  Is there a number associated with this club or is just a "gold triangle" type?

Thank you.

 

20210410_135920.jpeg

20210410_135858.jpeg


Posted

Those are I believe 1993 DCI GOLD irons that came out with the black triangle version as well. They didn’t have a number associated with them like the 962, 762 for example.

  • Thumbs Up 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 4/16/2021 at 9:44 PM, Vinsk said:

Those are I believe 1993 DCI GOLD irons that came out with the black triangle version as well. They didn’t have a number associated with them like the 962, 762 for example.

I think you're right. I own a set of those and still play them


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Piggybacking on this topic for a little help with the Sand Wedge(s) in this set.  There are 2 different styles, but both seem to have the identifying characteristics of the DCI Gold original set.  The one on the left is more common, and matches the ones found in the oversize and 962 sets (IIRC) but are not marked as being in those sets.  The one on the right has the same sole appearance as the rest of the DCI Gold set.

Any info that anyone can share?

image.jpeg.8ce2ee8f59715d92d7753b71b26f97dd.jpegimage.jpeg.517ca4c89677a7581cef23929291b2f2.jpeg


Posted

The one on the left looks to be from from the DCI wedges collection with wedge-specific grind profiles. 

The one on the right looks to be from the DCI Gold iron set, which could be ordered all the way to the lob wedge if desired with sole grinds that would match the iron set as opposed to being specific to the wedges.

 

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
48 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

The one on the left looks to be from from the DCI wedges collection with wedge-specific grind profiles. 

The one on the right looks to be from the DCI Gold iron set, which could be ordered all the way to the lob wedge if desired with sole grinds that would match the iron set as opposed to being specific to the wedges.

 

Great! I had forgotten that Titleist did those wedge sets. Any material differences in the two gold ones I showed other than difference in sole/bounce?

FWIW, Back when I bought my DCI Golds back in the day, I didn't buy the SW, and was thinking about grabbing it now to satisfy the completist in me.


Posted (edited)

The DCI wedge set is most likely meant to resemble the Triple Grind High Performance Wedges in shape and sole grind, but aimed at the players who were using DCI irons rather than their Titleist Tour Model blades of the time. The wedges from the DCI Gold iron set were most likely meant to more closely resemble the appearance of the irons themselves, without any distinct appearance differences or sole grind changes between the wedges and irons. The DCI iron set ones would also have been a convenience option for the average consumer, being able to order/purchase everything together as a single set at what was almost certainly a lower price compared to purchasing their wedges separately (since, in all honestly, the majority of golfers don't care about sole grinds or bounce spec of their wedges).

The bulk of the differences would be in the sole grind and bounce though, but I can't seem to find any spec for the DCI Iron set's bounce figures for direct comparison since it's blank on the Titleist website. Obviously the DCI wedges have much more heel, toe, and trailing edge relief grinding to set the leading edge lower when manipulating the clubface for different shots around the green while the DCI iron set wedges have minimal heel and trailing edge relief to match the grind profile you'd find on the rest of the iron set. The other difference would just be that the DCI wedges were available in Copper Beryllium or stainless steel, while the DCI iron set wedges were only available in stainless steel. As both options were a cast clubhead it's almost certain that they used the same steel alloy for both of them. 

Edited by Pretzel
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Wow.    I had a set of these, or at least a very, very similar model.   Really enjoyed them.   Wish I had more information about their specifics to contribute more to the conversation.   But I really enjoyed gaming them.

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Pretzel said:

The DCI wedge set is most likely meant to resemble the Triple Grind High Performance Wedges in shape and sole grind, but aimed at the players who were using DCI irons rather than their Titleist Tour Model blades of the time. The wedges from the DCI Gold iron set were most likely meant to more closely resemble the appearance of the irons themselves, without any distinct appearance differences or sole grind changes between the wedges and irons. The DCI iron set ones would also have been a convenience option for the average consumer, being able to order/purchase everything together as a single set at what was almost certainly a lower price compared to purchasing their wedges separately (since, in all honestly, the majority of golfers don't care about sole grinds or bounce spec of their wedges).

The bulk of the differences would be in the sole grind and bounce though, but I can't seem to find any spec for the DCI Iron set's bounce figures for direct comparison since it's blank on the Titleist website. Obviously the DCI wedges have much more heel, toe, and trailing edge relief grinding to set the leading edge lower when manipulating the clubface for different shots around the green while the DCI iron set wedges have minimal heel and trailing edge relief to match the grind profile you'd find on the rest of the iron set. The other difference would just be that the DCI wedges were available in Copper Beryllium or stainless steel, while the DCI iron set wedges were only available in stainless steel. As both options were a cast clubhead it's almost certain that they used the same steel alloy for both of them. 

That's some fantastic info!! Thanks $1m.


Note: This thread is 1280 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.