Jump to content
IGNORED

Considering Hybrid


muskegman
Note: This thread is 6812 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
I am happy to discredit the opinion of this pro that the Callaway is crap and can't be hit straight.That is a worthless opinion.It can be hit straight,thats a fact.

Dave, dude, you're still not getting it.

You were the one to first voice the opinion. I "countered" yours with the experiences of some 90+ golfers, as told to me by one of the best club pros and fitters in PA. You've missed the point, and that point was quite simple: you can't disparage the opinions of others while at the same time talking as though yours is golden. It can't and doesn't work that way. So, let's just drop it. I'm lecturing on semantics and reading comprehension at this point, and that's not what this thread is about.
Phil Mickelson amongst others currently use this club.

He really doesn't. He toyed with it earlier this year, but then moved back to his "standard" 3 and 4 woods - by TaylorMade and Titleist.

Look for yourself if you'd like.
Btw,the hybrid you use,I can't hit straight.I hook the TM into next week.But I would never describe it as crap.Its just me that can't hit it.

And I couldn't hit the non-TP model straight either. But, like Dave said, the TP in 8-8 works beautifully.

On a lighter note,and hopefully we can move on,I like you bag and wouldn't mind your opinion on the 905s (did you move from the 983?) and the 680s,particularly if you've hit the 690s.

905S from 983K, 680s after trying the 690s and finding they hit the ball too high.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yep,I'm finding the 690s go high as well,may well give the 680s a whirl.

My only issue was the statement 'the club is crap',which it clearly isn't.Thats an opinion that deserved a counter.But I agree,lets drop it,you have qualified the original statement and I can't argue with 90 players who have crap swings;)

What is the 905 like? I've had an Ignite and didn't get along with the YS-6+ .350 in it,the club was dead as a dormouse.

NC

I tired like hell with the TM but just didn't get along with it.I hit a draw and with that thing it went almost straight left,a bit wierd at first.I may give it another go.The Heavenwood flies too high for use off the tee.Its an arse having to carry a 2 iron as well and dump the lob wedge.

______________
Hogan Grinds 4-PW TLT fit X100 Tour
bent 2* strong
SMT Encore Fuji 26.3 X
Geek DCT 15* Accuflex 80MPT 51Ran Troom Grind 55Rife 2 Bar hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll jump in at this late date to say that the Heavenwoods are an acquired taste. Or, rather, that they work well for some people but not everyone. I can't say what swing characteristics they work best with, but I seem to see "better players" have more luck with them than higher handicappers. I have a friend who plays to a 5 and has two of them in the bag. He uses them like deadly weapons, having replaced his 3-wood and 2-iron with them. This is likely why some of the tour pros have had success with them. They don't hit the ball overly high, and you can work the ball with them. They aren't especially point-and-shoot, and they aren't hook machines (like lots of hybrids).

I, on the other hand, have never had trouble hitting a Callaway club. Until, that is, the Heavenwoods. They just don't work as well for me as some other hybrids (like my Sonartec Md). I'd take a Big Bertha FW of a comparable loft over a Heavenwood hybrid everyday. I think I do better with a more iron-like hybrid, and the Heavenwoods look like small woods to me. Different folks, different strokes.

in the bag today:
Driver: TaylorMade R9 10.5° (Fujikura Motore 65 stiff)
3-wood: Tour Edge Exotics XCG (Aldila DVS Fairway 75 stiff)
hybrid: Sonartec Md 21° (UST Proforce V2 Hybrid 85 stiff)
4-PW: Titleist 755 (Titleist TriSpec Regular)Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design 252.08 bent to 50.5° (Oil...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes,good post.Hybrids definately need extensive testing.I regard myself as a resonable striker of a golf ball,but when testing abiut 15 hybrids they were going pretty much everywhere.Yet I would test some 2 irons and the only variation was height.

The moral of the story is the right hybrid in the right hands is a deadly weapon as you say,the wrong one is just deadly.

______________
Hogan Grinds 4-PW TLT fit X100 Tour
bent 2* strong
SMT Encore Fuji 26.3 X
Geek DCT 15* Accuflex 80MPT 51Ran Troom Grind 55Rife 2 Bar hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6812 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Let's assume we have a tool to roll the ball an exact amount of distance and to start in the line we want it to roll. Basically the perfect putter. Now let's assume we have a 9 footer, with 2° consistent slope so we should aim our tool 2 fingers away from the hole (assuming we bent the arm in order to account for green speed) and set it to 10 feet of power to hole the putt. Last assumption we have a perfect green were the ball do what gravity tell it to do , no grass imperfections or grain tendencies. Also 0° degrees of upslope or downslope.  We set the perfect putter as mentioned and we hole the putt. Great! Now we place the ball in the same line but now 3 feet from the hole. We aim the tool 2 fingers away from the hole and set the power to 4 feet but this time we miss the hole on the high side. Again we move the ball but now to 15 feet in the same line, aim 2 finger away from the hole and set the power to 16 feet. We run the tool but this time we miss the hole on the low side.  As we were told all of those putts should be holed in the middle but all of them acted in different ways.. why? there's a simple reason.. eyes height. If we run the same scenarios but aim the tool using our fingers at ball height we are going to hole all of them, but when we aim with our fingers we do it at eyes height (normally standing tall) witch corrupt the numbers and making the perfect putter aim wrong and miss putts, only to be 100% accurate on the distance it was calibrated, in this example 9 feet.  Here is an example of this using a 6 foot golfer (assuming 5.5 feet distance from eyes to ground). Perfect putter was calibrated to hole with 2 fingers away from the hole at 9 feet.  From the 9 feet putter you can see that you need to aim 27 inches away from the hole to hole it. Because we calibrated our fingers at that distance using 2 finger works perfectly. But now if the use it in the 3 footer it make us aim 16 inches away from the hole were we only need to be 9 inches away from the hole so because we play more brake than we should we miss on the high side. The contrary happens with longer putts. At 15 feet with 2 fingers we aim 5 inches lower than we need so we miss on the low side.  On the last row we can see the real amount of finger we should use if we calibrated our fingers at 9 feet. Of course it changes in relations on what distance you did the calibration. This could could be use an explanation to why on really short putts is recommended to set the fingers in the low side of the hole instead of the middle like in normal putts.   As a conclusion, finger aiming is really accurate if we do it at ball height, but the more we lift our eyes away from the ball, the more the method is not going to be accurate, even more on short putts.   
    • First, drives and approach shots will improve by working on the full swing. So, they are not separate from working on your priority piece. Second, how bad is the short game?  Third, you can do 5 minutes a day and gain progress. How about allocate 10-minutes at least once a day to working on your priority piece. Then you can throw in a longer range session once a week if you need to. Priority pieces are going to take a while to have it stick. For some, it might be something you never stop working on, or needing to refresh the feel.    
    • Making swing changes is hard.  I wouldn't take 100% of the full swing time working on drills to ingrain the feeling, you still want to make sure you keep some touch with the rest of the irons/woods, maybe you do something where if you practice 3x per week on full swing, 2 of those sessions are like 90% focused on drills and swing improvements and 10% is on other full swing things, and then the other 1full swing day is maybe split like 50/50 on drills/swing improvements and more "game" like skills, trying to curve the ball, punch shots, face control practice, etc. Something like I outlined above is what I would do if I was trying to make a big swing change mid-season that way you don't lose form with the rest of your full swing clubs while trying to make the swing change.   This is good. Keep doing this.   Then the new swing hasn't fully taken hold yet. The order of learning goes something like this 1. Learn the new motion 2. Be able to do the motion slowly without a ball 3. Be able to do the motion slowly with a ball on the range 4. Be able to do the motion at half speed with a ball on the range 5. Be able to do the motion at full speed with a ball on the range 6. Be able to do the motion at full speed with a ball on the range without thinking about it 7. Be able to do the motion at full speed with a ball on the course You are almost certainly going to progress forward a couple of those steps, then regress, couple more forward then regress, etc. But think about this, if you can't do the motion at full speed with a ball on the driving range even while thinking about it, you probably don't have much chance doing it properly when on the course and there are so many other variables to consider as well (lie, elevation, target, wind, pressure, etc) This post talks about it more   A bunch, sure, but I don't think there's anything wrong with having a specific swing thought or two on the course. Some of my best rounds have come when I'm hyper-focused on one specific swing thought, being so focused on that thought helped keep negative thoughts out of my head and I just focused on the swing thought and made the best swing I could.   That is normal but that also means the new move isn't fully ingrained yet and you need to practice more. 
    • 1. My handicap is a 6.  2. Regarding my goals, I’m just looking to get more consistent overall. Due to my swing relying so heavily on perfect timing, I’ll play great one day then follow that up with a round that looks like I’ve never picked up a club before. I’ve never really cared much about how my swing looks and I don’t have anything on the schedule I’m trying to peak for.  3. My strength is definitely my short game. I can typically strike the ball pretty clean but because I get so steep and over the top, my miss with everything from my driver to wedges is a straight pull. Clean contact just starts left of my target.  In the Lowest Score Wins, they talk about Dave having a swing fault that was causing issues in his play and his ability to get comfortable on the golf course. He hit lots of balls thinking of nothing else than what he was trying to work on. Regardless of his attempts, when he went to his instructor, he kept getting the same lesson over and over again. The solution was having him do a drill and only hitting shots no further than 50 yards. I can certainly relate because the last two lessons I’ve had we worked on the same exact things even though I’d been practicing with a focus on correcting my faults. If I implement taking 65% of my time working on my full swing, should I take a page out of Dave’s book (no pun intended) and just work on drills to try to better ingrain the feeling? I’ve implemented certain aspects of the drills into my pre shot routine to ingrain the intended feeling. I’m still just really struggling to take my swing feels to the course. I’ve always been a firm believer in playing golf when you’re on the course and not getting caught up in a bunch of swing thoughts. With this being such a big change, I have a bad habit of going right back to my old ways when I only envision my intended shot shape and focus on the target. 
    • I got your DM, I'll check on the room and get back to you.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...