Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Another great session with my coach.  We got rid of the loop and worked hard on rotation to drive the club.  Still need to work on rotation a lot as I feel my shoulder rotation is a bit steep as well as my follow-through.  I believe I need to focus on getting the lead shoulder to rotate back better.  But I will see what I can incorporate.  Impact is all over the place, but that will come once I lock this down more:

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

After working with my coach, I had another great "ball-striking and driving" simulation round.  I say ball striking and driving because it was all for nothing as I couldn't score with wedges.  In fact, I scored worse hitting almost perfect off the tee.  I don't have any wedges calibrated for the 40-100 yard 1/2 shots.

A couple notes in the differences vs the past couple weeks:

1) I was significantly faster.  A couple of examples:  High 180's ball speed drives vs 170's.  150mph ball speed 5 irons.  I had to recalibrate all the clubs distance wise.  For example, I was hitting 7 irons about 25 yards further.  The speed increase was consistent across a couple different sims.  

2) Lower trajectory launch.  The driver was launching at 9.5 vs around 11-13.

Feels:

1) My only swing thoughts were lead wrist flexion at the top + driving the right shoulder down to the ball.

2) My Right elbow was squished more into my belly through transition and the Downswing vs into my right side

3) Left hip flexors, under the hip bone are sore.

4) Impact was very very good.  Especially with irons.

Another realization that I have come to the conclusion of is that my backyard snow setup isn't really ideal as the ground is slippy.  Rotation is much harder.  So yes I can practice some things, but things will be completely different when you have grip.

After playing 18, I took 30-40 mins to do some wedge practice in the sim.  I don't think this is something I can't drastically improve.  With my distance, if I'm striking the ball well off the tee, I think I can improve my scores significantly.  Within that time I was able to at least calibrate a 3/4 swing to some very loose yardages and I will have to work on my swing to get this nailed down with 1/2 swings as well:

60 degree - 60's yards

56 degree - 70's yards

52 degree - 80's yards

49 degree - 90's yards

46 degree - 100's yards

Here is the current wedge swing progression.  Three swings in the first video, improving transition to shallow with a 3/4 swing.  Then a face on view of 2 swings.

 

Front view

 

I am finally ready to start to work on my front view a lot more @iacas.  I focused on behind views and feel like I understand what transition moves get me on a good downswing plane.  I know I need to continue to work on my backswing.  You can see the second swing I get lazy and am inside.

For the front view I am definitely swaying, something that @iacas brought up before.  That tendency definitely affects a lot of things, but I notice it in my backswing at the top, my ability to get on my left side, steep shoulders through follow through, my follow through is limited causing my club to exit more vertically, left elbow out in the follow through, and this is probably the reason (or one of) that I have a large overdraw miss.  I know the feeling to fix it, it will just take time to engrain it.  I can at least say I'm committed to fixing that issue now as I can see its effect on the rest of the swing.

I have a long lesson tomorrow with my coach, so we will see if I can continue to progress.

  • Thumbs Up 1

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Still working a lot.

Irons are getting more consistent.  Launch is way down now.  5 iron is around 11-12 degrees.  5 iron swing plane is around 58 degrees, which is average for my height (ref https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0m63jlXvHw&t=694s).

This is a really old and not really accurate sim (other than launch and ball speed), so I don't really trust it.  They took off side spin because it was so messed up.  I just use it to work on my mechanics and hit balls after my league game as they let me hit as many as I want afterwards.  But I've been doing some trackman sessions at another sim and my dispersion was really good.  It didn't save for some reason in my profile.  So I'm going to go back and baseline my dispersions (for a decade golf approach).

I think in terms of swing, generally the biggest issue is keeping center contact consistent.  I get in a good grove and then get a little steep, which leads to a toe strike, or a little too shallow and get a heel strike.

I know in terms of my backswing and the top of my swing I come in a bit flat sometimes to the top.  So I'm not sure I want to mess with it exactly.  We are getting closer to the start of the season and you can only make so much progress.

Driver.  Ok so in the trackman my irons have a slight cut or fade that I can play around with by changing my setup.  But as I move to my 3 wood and driver, I tend to hit heel strikes and have a massive over draw.  I'm talking about 9-10 degrees in to out with an open face angle of maybe 2-3 degrees.  Very consistently.  You will see in this sim, there is no side spin, but in real life and the trackman sim, this would be in the next fairway:

So one thing that works in the trackman sim is setting up for a fade really open, say 5-10 degrees open.  I can neutralize the path.  It's not something that I really want to do, but it seems to work.  My swing plan for my driver is on the low end, around 43 degrees, which is pretty shallow, maybe too much.  With camera angles and lens distortion it's really hard to tell, but I don't think it's a dumped under or in to out swing plane issue.  I'm not playing the ball too far back in the stance either that would warrant a 9-10 degree in to out (i'm hitting up about 3-5 degrees on average).  So my theory (I'm open to other theories or views), is I am not counteracting the outward force enough through impact.  This is leading to the heel strikes and an outward path.  With my irons I really pull back with my left shoulder through impact as my right wrist pushes the club downward.  I don't really think about that with 3 wood or driver.

Soooo... next Trackman session I'm going to try some of the stuff the TXG guys were doing to reduce the overdraws.  One is a spoon in the trail armpit, two is a sharpie in the left armpit (get it left to the target), and three is getting the back of the right hand towards the left thigh.  The last one being the feel of slicing the club left across the ball, which I think is what I need to do to neutralize that extreme path.

So I'm open to any suggestions or comments.

Note:  Still working on Wedges and they are getting much better.  

image.thumb.jpeg.9760458bdbe9b31fa83dfe21d5967cb7.jpeg

 

 

 


  • Administrator
Posted
12 minutes ago, tickbomb said:

I think in terms of swing, generally the biggest issue is keeping center contact consistent.  I get in a good grove and then get a little steep, which leads to a toe strike, or a little too shallow and get a heel strike.

Your "shallow" or "steep" stuff is waving around a lot. You're steep, then do things to try to shallow it, all with a shut face. Gonna be tough.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 minutes ago, iacas said:

Your "shallow" or "steep" stuff is waving around a lot. You're steep, then do things to try to shallow it, all with a shut face. Gonna be tough.

I assume you referring to the club being shut at the top?  I agree.  A lot of that is from flexion.  I would say I'm not actively trying to motorcycle throttle the grip to get any flexion or anything.  I just kind of let it happen when I swing back and run out of room to rotate my arms and shoulders.  Relaxing the wrists in the backswing was something I worked on with my instructor, primarily wedges.  The weight of the club wants to keep going, so my wrists flex in that direction.  So I would say from my perspective when I swing, it actually feels like a continuation of rotation and is very square and gets a lot of lag.  I'm able to just feel like I'm rotating my body in the downswing without having to square things up.

I get comments from my group a lot about it, but I never really thought anything of it since I was striking the ball better.  I get a lot more flexion with wedges, but I had to learn to actively get rid of it through impact with my right hand otherwise they would launch very low.

That's the idea we were working on at least.


Posted
2 hours ago, iacas said:

Your "shallow" or "steep" stuff is waving around a lot. You're steep, then do things to try to shallow it, all with a shut face. Gonna be tough.

Ohh are you talking about the backswing being flat 1/2 way from P2 to P3 to steeper at the top "waving"?  That's 100% the camera lens distortion.  It isn't flat when I film places where the camera can get further back.   My armpits are also not that far past my toes at setup.  Next time when I go to the other Sim, I should be able to film from further back.


  • Administrator
Posted
7 hours ago, tickbomb said:

That's 100% the camera lens distortion.

No, it's not. I know what I'm looking at.

You're shallow, get steep at the top, then carry your arms out a bunch, so you have to pivot stall to let the club tip back under again.

image.jpeg

That's what "waving around" means, and why you're inconsistent with what you noted above.

Look, man, I'm not enjoying this pattern. I've tried to help a few times before and just did again, but you clearly don't want it as you don't think I know what I'm talking about. That's fine. I'll save myself the time.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Updated swing:

Had a good winter golf league.  Was shooting consistently in the 60's inside, which you will see doesn't equate to outside obviously.  But was good confidence builder to see how to play the game to shoot under. 

I had some left wrist issues from hitting too many drivers in the sim (De Quervain tenosynovitis).  So my swing has changed since starting to play outside to put less pressure on my thumb.  So far it's feeling good.

I've been purposely adding more front bend at setup and sticking my butt out more.  For three reasons.  One, it gives my right elbow more room through impact.  Two, it doesn't hurt my right SI joint when I swing now.  Three, I'm hitting it really, really well.  My coach teaches more traditional setup like arnold palmer and use leg work/squat/etc to get down and through but I am tired of waking up sore.  My SI joint feels pain free now, other than stiffness that is still working itself out.  Speed is definitely down, but striking is much better.

Last year my scores were anywhere from 89 to 105.  This year every round has been under 90.  Here is my last round I shot 85.  Note the clubs aren't what I actually hit (conditions were cold lots of wind 25mph and wet):

image.thumb.png.dc5a9ec0cda401472dec81da3c467f0f.png

The good: I'm on a good putting streak, draining lots of long puts and making critical 5-10 footers in spite of two 3 putts.  Lots of confidence in putting.

Fairways woods.  Hitting very well.  However on 11 and 13 I hit my 3 wood too far into hazards.  So those were mental mistakes hitting 3 wood vs 5 wood.

Irons.  I hit a lot of good iron shots.  However distances were a guess in the wind + with my swing alterations.

Mental.  I had zero swing mechanic thoughts.  Very target orientated.  Followed a pre-swing routine.  Very relaxed.  Used Decade methodology for targets.

The Bad

3 putts: 2

Driver Hooks: Every time except hole 2.  Pretty sure it's toe strikes + closed face + too in to out lol.  A couple rounds ago I had a very consistent draw that I could play.  But now they are snappers.  

Sand shots.  I probably lost 3 shots to greenside bunker play.  The sand was wet.  So something to practice at least before a round.  I am usually a decent bunker player.  I just didn't know how hard to swing in that sand.

Pitching/chipping under 30 yards.  This probably cost me 6 shots if you ignore the whole strokes gained from approaches etc.

---------------------

I play friday and sunday and then have another lesson on monday.  So we will see if the trend continues.  But so far I am focused on:

Driver.  If I doesn't want to work, I'll stick with fairway's off the tee.  But 

Distance Wedges.  I have to go out and figure out all my wedge numbers with my clock system.  I did some, but need to do the rest.

Chipping.  I need to spend time on a real green chipping under 20 yards and understanding the rollout.  I got really good chipping to a set distance, but my rollout judging is lacking.

For now I'll let irons and putting naturally improve through playing and practice before the round.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Swing Work with coach:  Lots of dedicated work to stop getting across the line at the top, keeping everything connected, and not swaying in my pivot.  When I sway, typically that leads to a hook or push right as it needs some kind of timing to get everything back together.  Worked on trying to focus on hitting the inside of the ball at 630 as a feel.

Swinging something like this now.  I stopped taking so many videos as I was going crazy:

 

My scoring last year 

My scoring this year:

 

Great round yesterday.  Played from the back tees with some really good players.  I'm averaging between 1-2 birdies a round now.  Ball striking was much better.  Driving was really good.  Things to focus on now:

Pitching/Chipping:  I am really good at chips and pitches while I practice, but in a game I forget to pick a specific landing spot as an aggressive target.  Mentally I just think distance in yards and "that direction".  So I just need to take more time and focus on very very specific landing spots and focus on that.  I could probably shave 2-3 strokes.

Sand:  I was in the sand around 6 shots yesterday.  2 fairway bunkers and 4 green side.  I was great out of the fairway bunkers, but only got up and down from one greenside.  So either I need to miss more bunkers or practice.  Although the sand was hard and wet, so I didn't really know how to play out of wet sand in some cases.

Putting:  two 3 putts.  Need to improve distance control.

Driver.  Too much variability in distance and trajectory.  Distance is anywhere from 250 to 295 (wind is a factor, but also just poor striking).  I'm still working on better control, but I honestly think I have inconsistent strike locations.  So I'll just start to track strike location better when I go to the range.

Distance Wedges.  Need to continue to dial this in.  Also I found that on very firm turf my trajectory is very low ultra spinny shots.  Not sure if it's a bounce thing.  

I have another lesson in June.  Goal this year is get to the 70's.

 

image.jpeg

image.jpeg


Posted
1 hour ago, tickbomb said:

Sand:  I was in the sand around 6 shots yesterday.  2 fairway bunkers and 4 green side.  I was great out of the fairway bunkers, but only got up and down from one greenside.  So either I need to miss more bunkers or practice.  Although the sand was hard and wet, so I didn't really know how to play out of wet sand in some cases.

How closely are you following Decade? I get that it's not always possible to eliminate every greenside bunker simply based on where you aim and what club you hit, but surely (without knowing much about the course(s) you're playing), it seems like you're probably either being a touch too aggressive with your target or your shot zone is bigger than you're account for if you're hitting into greenside bunkers 20%+ of the time (Or both).

1 hour ago, tickbomb said:

Putting:  two 3 putts.  Need to improve distance control.

Or improve proximity of approach shots. If your 3 putts came from 50+ feet over a massive ridge or something then that's not necessarily indicative of a distance control problem but rather a proximity to the pin problem. Now if those 3 putts came from inside like 20 feet or something then sure there's a distance control issue.

FWIW, PGA Tour players average over 2 strokes to hole out whenever they are outside 40 feet and the average 90s golfer averages over 2 putts whenever they are outside 20 feet.

The average 90s golfer has a 3 putt percentage of 30% from 40 feet, so if you left yourself like 6 or 7 40 footers in a round it's not that unrealistic or abnormal for you to have two 3 putts.

 

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
44 minutes ago, klineka said:

How closely are you following Decade? I get that it's not always possible to eliminate every greenside bunker simply based on where you aim and what club you hit, but surely (without knowing much about the course(s) you're playing), it seems like you're probably either being a touch too aggressive with your target or your shot zone is bigger than you're account for if you're hitting into greenside bunkers 20%+ of the time (Or both).

Or improve proximity of approach shots. If your 3 putts came from 50+ feet over a massive ridge or something then that's not necessarily indicative of a distance control problem but rather a proximity to the pin problem. Now if those 3 putts came from inside like 20 feet or something then sure there's a distance control issue.

FWIW, PGA Tour players average over 2 strokes to hole out whenever they are outside 40 feet and the average 90s golfer averages over 2 putts whenever they are outside 20 feet.

The average 90s golfer has a 3 putt percentage of 30% from 40 feet, so if you left yourself like 6 or 7 40 footers in a round it's not that unrealistic or abnormal for you to have two 3 putts.

 

Thanks, and I agree.  I have the decade card taped to my bag.  I try to use decade logic for my shots.  But sometimes I just really mess up.

WRT fairway bunkers off the tee, I didn't warm up on a driving range, so the first shot of the day, starting on hole 10, was my worst shot of the day.  An extreme short slice/push to a bunker, then 7 iron out to the greenside bunker, which was struck well.  Probably could have taken more club though. 

IMG_5309.thumb.PNG.dd098f71dee6af026d558abcae6e9b54.PNG

Then the last hole (#9) I was aiming well right of the water on the left, but pulled it into the bunkers.  There was a strong constant head wind on that hole.  Trouble for 3 wood left and right.  Lots more landing area with a driver vs 3 wood.  The second shot I actually took a lot of club to get to the back of the green past the bunkers, but I slipped in the bunker as I swung and it ballooned into the wind.  I was actually able to get up and down on the last bunker. 

IMG_5310.thumb.PNG.68775cfcd73dae62376003dbbd97afaf.PNG

 

The other bunkers were par 5 greenside bunkers.

Also, for what it's worth, my old miss was a push/hook.  Now with the swing change it's more of a low trajectory heel pull like on 9.  I basically went from snap hooks, so I'm still trying sort out my aim points.  But I 100% think that a decade approach probably turns my rounds from a 90 to a low 80's, but even more important I don't lose golf balls anymore 🙂

Some examples of good drives (these all had basically straight ball flights, no big movement), with hole 17 a heel pull from where I was aiming and the other two were struck well:

IMG_5311.thumb.PNG.76ade20a27107ba12f63fa74500e980a.PNGIMG_5312.thumb.PNG.a971e0988ecc6bd911c0241d058beffa.PNGIMG_5313.thumb.PNG.874d7c7d408c7b84bf357fb259e37e68.PNG

On those, I just chose my landing area that was past trouble for a well hit drive and sent it past the trouble.  So if you're not a 100% consistent driver distance wise, does decade have a way to manage that?

WRT 3 putts, they were both under 20 feet that I just didn't hit.  My lag putts were actually pretty good and I'm pretty good within 5/6 feet.


Posted
1 hour ago, tickbomb said:

On those, I just chose my landing area that was past trouble for a well hit drive and sent it past the trouble.  So if you're not a 100% consistent driver distance wise, does decade have a way to manage that?

I've not done the subscription or taken any of the decade courses, but any proper strategy should account for mis hits, remember there are two kinds of dispersion that need to be taken into account, the left/right dispersion and the distance dispersion. That applies off the tee as well. Nobody is 100% consistent driver distance wise, there's going to be variance. But a proper shot zone I believe takes 90% of your drives into consideration so that should account for some of those shorter ones in your dispersion pattern.

1 hour ago, tickbomb said:

WRT 3 putts, they were both under 20 feet that I just didn't hit.  My lag putts were actually pretty good and I'm pretty good within 5/6 feet.

You 3 putted twice under 20 feet. How can you say your lag putting and inside 5-6 feet were both pretty good? Clearly one or both of those weren't good if you 3 putted twice inside 20 feet.

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
44 minutes ago, klineka said:

I've not done the subscription or taken any of the decade courses, but any proper strategy should account for mis hits

DECADE's "Shot Zones" (aiming strategies) are far too small for the average golfer. Heck, they're too small for the average 2 handicapper.

44 minutes ago, klineka said:

You 3 putted twice under 20 feet. How can you say your lag putting and inside 5-6 feet were both pretty good? Clearly one or both of those weren't good if you 3 putted twice inside 20 feet.

Yep.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, klineka said:

I've not done the subscription or taken any of the decade courses, but any proper strategy should account for mis hits, remember there are two kinds of dispersion that need to be taken into account, the left/right dispersion and the distance dispersion. That applies off the tee as well. Nobody is 100% consistent driver distance wise, there's going to be variance. But a proper shot zone I believe takes 90% of your drives into consideration so that should account for some of those shorter ones in your dispersion pattern.

You 3 putted twice under 20 feet. How can you say your lag putting and inside 5-6 feet were both pretty good? Clearly one or both of those weren't good if you 3 putted twice inside 20 feet.

So I blew one ~20 footer 6 or so feet past the hole and put one 20 footer > 6 feet short.  I think I only had one long lag put, say 50 feet downhill, which I got within 4-5 feet and then made.  The 10-20 footers I'm more focused on making, so I just don't call them lag putts.  But there seems to be always a couple times a round where my speed is way off on something under 15-20 feet, and I know it right when I hit it.  So definition of lag putt aside, I think I need to lock in distance control better for probably 10-30 footers.  Killing 3 putts would mean 2-3 strokes a round, which would be great.


Posted
2 hours ago, iacas said:

DECADE's "Shot Zones" (aiming strategies) are far too small for the average golfer. Heck, they're too small for the average 2 handicapper.

That's what I suspected.  At my skill level it's a waste of time to do math to move my target x yards when there is a bunker and y yards when there is water.  I'm just trying to keep the ball in play and avoid penalty strokes.  But it's nice to have a decade mentality to not short side yourself and taking an extra club to avoid trouble, etc.


  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, tickbomb said:

That's what I suspected.  At my skill level it's a waste of time to do math to move my target x yards when there is a bunker and y yards when there is water.  I'm just trying to keep the ball in play and avoid penalty strokes.  But it's nice to have a decade mentality to not short side yourself and taking an extra club to avoid trouble, etc.

Yeah, but we said it first. 😉

Even called it "The Rule."

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 months later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much...

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much...

One and a half years later.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 610 - 2026-06-03 Got some work in between lessons today. Rare late day, teaching until 7:30pm.
    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.