Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

https://www.puttlink.com/

PuttLink_Box.jpg

I will be reviewing the PuttLink Smart Ball, winner of the Best New Product award at the 2023 PGA Show. It is a golf ball with an embedded computer chip that tracks the roll distance, speed of the putt, and other information. It pairs with an app on your smart phone that has several different practice modes on it. 

PuttLink_Unboxed.jpg

The packaging is fine. It's not Apple quality or anything but it's good. The ball can be a little tricky to get out of that pocket but most people are only doing it once, so it's not a big deal. The QR code on the outer sleeve takes you to their website where there are links you can use to download the app and instructions on how to use the product I may or may not have read before using for the first time.

Included is the Smart Ball itself, a tee you use to turn it on, a magnetic insert you put inside a hole to detect if the ball is holed, a phone holder, and a pouch to put everything in. My phone has a case on it that makes it slightly too thick to sit in the slot well, but YMMV on that. It does have an Apple Watch app that I am not able to test at the moment because my watch is too old and the app requires software version 9.0 or later. I will revisit this in the near future. There's an additional option to purchase it with an infrared emitter accessory for use indoors with low-light conditions, but it did not come with the one I was given to review.

PuttLink_Contents.jpg

As far as the ball itself, it does a good job of mimicking a golf ball. It weighs about 45g or 1 5/8oz (note: my kitchen scale is not a precision instrument), which is the exact same weight as the Snell MTB Prime I tested. Off the putter it feels slightly hollow, which I guess makes sense. It felt closer to putting a range ball than it did the MTB Prime, but the difference isn't really significant. There is a red line you can use for alignment if you wish to, or you can simply flip the ball the opposite end up and putt without it, which is what I prefer to do. Using the ball is pretty intuitive. It is important to set the ball up with the PuttLink logo up as that is where the optical sensors are located (there are two, on opposite sides) for accurate distance measurement. This is something @iacas and @boogielicious made fun of me for not doing at first because I was too dumb to read the instructions before I started using it for the first time. You want to strike the ball on the plain side of it, which is the opposite side of the power button.

It does require a decent amount of lighting to use so that could be an issue if you're using it indoors to practice at home. There was not enough lighting in my hallway for the ball to register movement but I was able to get it to work in the master bedroom that is well-lit from a large window. As long as you're following directions, the measurements are pretty accurate. It seems to under-read the distance occasionally, but I think that may be due to the ball skidding or sliding in the initial phase of a putt and the sensors are not detecting rotation. It also measures stimp well. I measured my carpet with a homemade stimpmeter some time ago to about 11.1 and the PuttLink gave me an average stimp of 11.6. The hole insert is exactly what you think it is. You put in inside of the hole and when the ball hits it, it registers that it's been holed. You use in some practice modes where you're trying to hole the putt and the app will keep track of your make percentage as well as the total length of putts made.

The PuttLink Smart Golf Ball is $199. It has a built-in battery that is not rechargeable, but according to their website, should last up to two years and over 1,000 putts. A one-year battery warranty is included with the option to extend it another year for $25. The IR emitter is available as an add-on for $25, but I do not see an option to purchase it separately. I'll post more thoughts as I use it more but for now I wanted to get my initial thoughts up.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
    • I have access to far more data (including surveys and polls) than you do with your anecdotes. I mean this as plainly and literally as possible: you’ve demonstrated that you do not. They would, one way or the other.
    • Yes, but you don't live in the UK, so you have no idea what we think about it here. It's a very different mindset here, to demonstrate the fact you should consider 9 out of 10 games we play here are Stableford, whereas you you almost solely play medal. Neither is right or wrong, it's just different  I'm trying to avoid swearing here. Once again, and for the 1000th time, I understand the system, I just don't agree with it. Is there anything wrong with that? PS, I do not have the time or patience to post my results, especially as they prove nothing  That's because 99% of the posters are Yanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.