Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6464 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
On the most recent Sandtrap.com podcast it was rumoured that Tiger Woods commands $3mn appearance fees to play in certain tournaments, whether inside or outside of the PGA tour. It was questioned in the programme whether TW actually commands this fee or if that is the sum required to get him to play in tournaments.

Ok, he has played in New Zealand for a reported fee of $3mn, but im sure that he would never ask for such a sum- i feel that organisers decide what would be required to coax him away from his Tiger pad. What do you think?

I was suggested in the Podcast that certain playerrs in certain tourneys get underhand payments to get them to play in certain events- surely, this practice only applies to TW, Phil and possibly the likes of Greg Norman and possibly John Daly (although i would hazard a guess that he has to bribe organisers now to get in to tourneys- the days of him commanding appearance fees are long gone for him now surely!..lol). How would paymenst be made informally?- wire transactions?, stock?, share options?, free cars?, escort services?, free boats?, a property in a new holiday complex?

Also, we have to consider whether appearance fees are fair and what it does to the motivation and feelings of the rest of the field? Personally, if i knew that one of my playing partners was receiving a humungous payment just for turning up, that would irritate me..if they missed the cut and still got paid that would be even more irritating(!).

But that has to be balanced with the need to publicise events and put bums on seats- if the crowds turn up to watch the star player, then the appearance fee is justified. However, i do believe that these fees create a two tier golf tour which is not very fair. It is hoped that the fees Tiger or Phil is paid are donated to charity, not just stuffed in their already bloated coffers.

Posted
My understanding is that PGA Tour events cannot pay appearance fees, although they do circumvent the rule by providing a 'payment' for the pro-am (or something like that -- I can't recall the exact details).

There is no doubt that Tiger gets an appearance fee for non-PGA Tour tournaments -- also, I think John Daly is still in demand outside the US and will get paid to play (even now).

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


Posted
There are pros and cons of appearance fees, and on balance they are beneficial to the game, depending on the weight you give to viewing figures and the publicity the game receives.

  • Administrator
Posted
On the most recent Sandtrap.com podcast it was rumoured that Tiger Woods commands $3mn appearance fees to play in certain tournaments, whether inside or outside of the PGA tour.

No, it was never "inside" the PGA Tour. Only "outside."

Ok, he has played in New Zealand for a reported fee of $3mn, but im sure that he would never ask for such a sum- i feel that organisers decide what would be required to coax him away from his Tiger pad. What do you think?

I also think that was in 2001 - so quite a long time ago, and really not terribly relevant. As I said in the podcast, he's played in Asia and Dubai recently, but his mother is Thai and he has business interests in Dubai. I'm not sure you could just get Tiger to show up for $10M if it would disrupt his schedule at all. He has the money - 5% of his yearly income isn't going to do much to pique his interest.

I was suggested in the Podcast that certain playerrs in certain tourneys get underhand payments to get them to play in certain events- surely, this practice only applies to TW, Phil and possibly the likes of Greg Norman and possibly John Daly (although i would hazard a guess that he has to bribe organisers now to get in to tourneys- the days of him commanding appearance fees are long gone for him now surely!..lol).

My comment there referred to the somewhat scandalous "outing" that happened before, IIRC, Doral a few years ago. I think a lot of players were paid to play in an event on Monday with the "understanding" that they would stick around and play in the tournament. It may have been a Ford outing, or something, and Vijay Singh, Sergio Garcia, and a few other guys showed up. Again, IIRC...

Tournament organizers (like the Wachovia - they're famous for this) for doing all they can to accommodate the players. The Wachovia sends them bottles of expensive wine, or promises some players certain kinds of lodging, etc. Those aren't strictly appearance fees at all, but they're some "extra service and stuff" that goes a bit above and beyond.
Also, we have to consider whether appearance fees are fair and what it does to the motivation and feelings of the rest of the field? Personally, if i knew that one of my playing partners was receiving a humungous payment just for turning up, that would irritate me..if they missed the cut and still got paid that would be even more irritating(!).

Frankly, I'm not sure you'd feel that way if the guy getting it was Tiger Woods. He rarely misses a cut. Same with Phil and even Vijay. The second tier is another story, but at the same time, I dunno - it's done on the European Tour and I'm not sure people care or whine much there about it. After all, the stars bring money to the game - money that you have a chance to earn by playing well. Tiger alone has raised purses substantially. How bitter could you really be about that?

That being said, it really doesn't happen on the PGA Tour, and as I said in the podcast, I don't think Tiger could be swayed (everyone has their price, but I don't see anyone donating $20M to the TWLC to get him to play) because his schedule is so set and geared around the majors.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
John Daly is playing this week in Spain and next week in Italy on the European Tour. Everyone is delighted - more people will watch it on tv, way more people will go to the event and it's great for the European Tour. Daly comes over most years to play in events here. Heck - I even went to watch him in the Irish Open when Sergio won in 99!

I've no problem with appearance fees on the European Tour - how often do you get to see or meet your heros when you live here? Daly, Payne Stewart, Tom Lehman to name but a few that i've seen...

Golf is a business as much as a sport. It's a case of supply and demand. Tiger gets a massive paycheque to play in Dubai - but they keep paying him! Not only is he the world's best player, but he's in demand all over the world.

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...


Posted

Apparently, Rory Sabbatini was paid $220,000 to play the Australian Open. Not sure about vfm there...
Mickelson's reported fee for the HSBC Masters in China was $600K and the reports are generally that it was money well spent. Not sure how much he gets for the Scottish Open, if anything, but again the reports are positive.
In general terms, I'd rather see bigger pots of prizemoney - they would tend to attract the top players anyway.
It was nice to see Daly at the Spanish Open but it doesn't look like he'll be playing the weekend. But he'll probably still be around, signing autographs, selling merchandise and maybe learning a bit of Flamenco guitar
It's been a bone of contention on the European Tour for decades. The first to get appearance fees was Jacklin - a category was created for 'Major winners'. He was the only one at the time but there were quite a few in the 1980s and 90s. I do believe the practice has spread to crowd-pullers and higher-ranked players, as well as Major winners.


Note: This thread is 6464 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.