Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6211 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am planning on going to the range sometime soon to get video of my swing. One thing that I absolutely already know that I lack is distance and I know that (usually) means swing speed. What I want to know is if it is possible to determine swing speed using a regular video camera, or would it need to be a high speed camera? It should be easy enough to set up one of those lined strips as a reference and just stick it at my feet, but would the 29.97 fps capture be enough to provide any useful data?

I am hoping there is a math whiz or two here who can lend me a hand in setting this up (if it is even worth trying).

Blog Internetz | Twitter | Rolling Knolls
----
Super LoCo 457cc 10*
Tight Lies 16* & 13*
Recovery 21* Pure Distance 4-PW Diadic 52* and raw 588 60* Anser 4 blade U-Tri Tour


Posted
30 frames per second would likely be too slow to get an accurate speed measurement. Your club will be traveling so fast that it will appear as a blur at impact.

R7 TP 8.5* Fuji Speeder x-stiff (heavy,low,fade set)
975F 3W 13.5*
FX Tour Grind Nickel 3-PW +1/2", Rifle 6.5
Vokey SW 52*
CG10 LW 60* 3 dot (14* bounce) Tracy putter 35" (hit R but putt L)+ 1 club TBD...Past home courses: Unicorn GC (Stoneham, MA), Forest Creek GC (Round Rock, TX)Ball: Use...


Posted
Ways of getting a very rough estimate could be timing the entire swing using video, ie from the top of the backswing to the finish as well as measuring the distance from the centre of your chest to the clubhead with your arms fully stretched out. You could then work out the circumference of this circle/arc and use this measurement with the time of the entire swing to work out a speed.

In fact, having written that out, its probably not worth doing, because a swing is nowhere near a perfect circle, nor does it turn through exactly 360 degrees. Also swing speed isnt constant so it would be extremely innaccurate.

This brings me to the conclusion that measuring your swing speed with a 30 fps camera will be extremely difficult if not impossible.

In my bag:
Driver: G10 10.5 TFC 129 Shaft
3 wood: R7 Steel
Hybrid: 585H 21 Degree
Irons 3-PW: 735.CMWedges: Vokey 52.08, 56.14Putter: White Hot XG #5


  • Administrator
Posted
In fact, having written that out, its probably not worth doing, because a swing is nowhere near a perfect circle, nor does it turn through exactly 360 degrees. Also swing speed isnt constant so it would be extremely innaccurate.

Yeah, not worth it at all.

To the OP, forget about distance right now. With proper technique, distance will come. I recommend at least 60 FPS for diagnosing and fixing any swing flaws. 30 is "okay" but won't help you to fine-tune much at all.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Even if you could, it would represent average velocity at best, from the start of your downswing until the end. That doesn't tell you what it is at impact, which is what matters. You need instantaneous velocity. I suppose if you shortened the distance enough to say, 1 foot behind the ball to 1 foot past it, you could estimate the instantaneous velocity, but the video would have to be like 200 FPS and it would still be awfully inaccurate.

As others have said, forget about swing speed and distance, there are far better things to worry about!

Posted
I am not dead set on hitting it 300 yards or anything, but I finally have myself straightened out now and I was hoping that my awful slice was a contributing factor to not hitting it long but it appears not to have been, as my distances (particularly with my woods) are still not where I would like.

I've always said I would rather hit it short and straight than long and inaccurately (breaking news: WHOA IMMELMAN NICE FINISH) but now that I am comfortable and confident I want to know if my clubhead speed is what is holding me back.

I am a mixture of interested and terrified about seeing myself swinging on video.

Blog Internetz | Twitter | Rolling Knolls
----
Super LoCo 457cc 10*
Tight Lies 16* & 13*
Recovery 21* Pure Distance 4-PW Diadic 52* and raw 588 60* Anser 4 blade U-Tri Tour


Posted
Do they even sell cameras specifically for video taping golf swings?
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

  • Administrator
Posted
  Dent said:
Do they even sell cameras specifically for video taping golf swings?

Yeah. Remember Fore Inventors Only? There are also the SwingVision type ones you can buy.... if you have $15k or whatever.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Dent said:
Do they even sell cameras specifically for video taping golf swings?

I have been investigating and eventually got the software for my home digital camcorder to be a swing recorder. They all offer some sort of method to measure swing and ball speed. True they capture only 30 frames per second, but can capture a good "still" image at each frame if you can manually set your shutter speed (1/1000 second is recommended) and have enough light. Then you need to calibrate the image with a yard stick (a large one with easy to read markings). You could leave the measuring stick in the frame for each swing or a single recording at the same zoom where you can determine the distance.

So you have an accurate measure of time (29.97 frames per second so you have 1/29.97 seconds per frame) and a distance measure. The software allows you to draw a line or somehow indicate a distance in an image - to calibrate this to the software. Then I think you just mark your club head in two or more frames and they do the calculation for you. I have not done this yet, just reading up on the process. Some software has this option as an extra add on, others include in some "level" of the software package. But I also agree the more dedicated instruments at golf stores or with some pro's is probably more accurate. Ball speed is harder as it is moving faster, is close to being out of the frame with a typical way we frame the swing image, and harder to capture as it is smaller than the club head. One site had an example where they did get ball speed.

Driver: 400 SZ
Irons: Maltby custom fit KE4's
Sandwedge: Maltby Slider
Others: random selection


Note: This thread is 6211 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for trying to help me out,I'm leaning toward videoing myself,I will have my sister cam me,I gotta tell you that my swing is not a pretty thing..lol.
    • In general, don't see what is so harsh. If you don't like, it's not the law.. just make your own rules. I love vanity cappers Two additional points: 1) Most golfers are not that good: Yes, and most of them think they are better than they are. So a softer penalty would suit their vanity. No, thanks. The 'right' kind would not mind S&D. 2) Houses pinching fairways: If not OB, people would go in and try to hit out of people's yards. Trespassing galore. No, thanks.   
    • I hate articles like these. If you are playing just to have fun, it doesn't matter what rules you are following. Nobody will care if you hit one OB, drop, and then mark down a 5 instead of a 6. If it doesn't impact anyone else or hurt the course, then go wild. For competitive golf, I think stroke and distance or the MLR on OB/lost balls is fine. I don't see any reason to change it. The penalty being too harsh just doesn't register with me.
    • @Christoby - We really can't help you out more at this point. You haven't posted a swing (here or in the member swing subforum), and you haven't provided any concrete data that shows how high you hit it. Generally, you want to be able to hit it pretty high. PGA Tour average is around 100 feet, but also the best players tend to be a bit above that. The conventional wisdom is that it's best to be high with longer clubs and be able to flight it lower with wedges and short irons.  I would guess that you are not hitting it too high. But it's just a guess because you don't have videos or concrete data.  That said, don't do this: It's a band aid that will lead to bad habits.
    • This article makes the claim that stroke and distance is overly harsh. The Worst Rule In Golf | MyGolfSpy There should be a change here. Their claims as to why it is overly harsh.  1) Most golfers are not very good.  Yes, but the rules of golf have been around way before pro golfer existed, and most were not very good.  2) There are too much OB on many modern golf courses.  Maybe were the author lives there are tons of courses with housing developments and tons of OB everywhere, but I don't see it. When I played on courses with a lot of housing, it isn't crazy tight that OB really comes into play that often. So, I think this claim is not valid. 3) PGA Tour players have the benefit of galleries and ball spotters to find lost balls.  Yes, but I do not think it is consistent the further down you go the pro tour hierarchy. Also, this is just a claim to validate more bifurcation of the rules, and it's not really a good one.  4) A lot of golf courses are not properly marked with hazards or maintained.  This is true, but also the rules of golf cover this. A water hazard doesn't need to be marked for it to be a water hazard.   5) It slows down play because you have to go back to the previous spot to re hit the shot.  I get losing a golf ball in tall grass, or sometimes in normal rough sucks. If you hit one close to OB, or into the woods, hit a provisional. It speeds up play for a good portion of times you will have to take stroke and distance.  Then the articles go into a few not really well backed reasons to further bifurcate the rules to make OB less penalizing for amateurs. Basically, they want the modified local rule of placing the ball in the fairway with two stroke penalty to be a one stroke penalty. This means that OB is now less penal than a lateral hazard. Imagine if the water hazard is at the base of a steep-ish slope. If you drop there, you will have a horrible lie/stance. I think right off the bat this stance is not valid. They go into where PGA Tour players get benefits over amateurs. Things like temporary immovable objects allow them to get free relief. Courses normally do not have the stands or other equipment needed to run a tournament. The argument is very weak.  I might be willing to say that OB marked with a white stake and/or white line should be played like a lateral hazard. The scenario in my head is, what if there is a golf hole where there is a lake on the left, and OB on the right that goes down the entire hole. If you hit the ball into the lake, it is not playable. So, to me there is little difference between hitting it left in the water versus right OB. Though, you may be able to play it from the water. A lot of times a lateral hazard is not marked on the water's edge exactly. A lost ball is a lost ball. There is nothing staked, so it is hard to judge where it should be. So, stroke and distance make more sense.  Yea, I think the rules make sense with stroke and distance penalty. I would say not overly harsh.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...