Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6564 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
something I havent quite been taught, is there a certain way to use handicaps while keeping score? or do you just minus it from the end? and on score cards the handicap numbers 1-18 what exactly do they mean and do you use them to with your handicap number?

r7 draw driver 9.5* stiff shaft
Big bertha 06 irons, 4-sw
56*vokey spin milled 10*bounce
Victoria ;)
tp black balls cart bagJack nicklaus Golden Bear 52* and 60* wedgesWalter hagen: 3 wood 5 wood 4 hybrid stiff shaft"I don't say my golf game is bad, but if I grew tomatoes they'd come up sliced."www...


Posted
something I havent quite been taught, is there a certain way to use handicaps while keeping score? or do you just minus it from the end? and on score cards the handicap numbers 1-18 what exactly do they mean and do you use them to with your handicap number?

The handicaps are the ratings of that hole on the course: 1 being the hardest. They are also used to give an advantage to you if you are a higher handicap than the opponent.

For example, if you are playing a scratch player, you would be given strokes to give you a fair chance at winning depending on the handicap of the hole. I'm sure someone can give a better example.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
ok well do you use your handicap to keep score during play? or do you take strokes off at the end, and do the ratings correspond at ALL to strokes given?

r7 draw driver 9.5* stiff shaft
Big bertha 06 irons, 4-sw
56*vokey spin milled 10*bounce
Victoria ;)
tp black balls cart bagJack nicklaus Golden Bear 52* and 60* wedgesWalter hagen: 3 wood 5 wood 4 hybrid stiff shaft"I don't say my golf game is bad, but if I grew tomatoes they'd come up sliced."www...


Posted

Theres more info here:

http://thesandtrap.com/extras/rules/whats_your_handicap this explains a little bit of it: So im not totally sure but I think you assess the strokes during the round.
"Say you've computed your handicap index to be 10.9. You're playing your buddy, who has a handicap index of 21.6. You consult the course at which you'll be playing to find that their slope rating provides you with 11 handicap strokes and your friend with 23: you owe your friend 12 strokes. The score card most likely has a row marked "Hdcp" with numbers ranging from 1 to 18. Your friend is given one stroke apiece on holes with the handicap of 1 through 12. The #1 handicap hole is supposed to be the toughest on the course, and the #18 handicap hole the easiest. Because par fives offer more chances to "screw up" and because par threes offer less, par threes often occupy slots 15 through 18 while par fives often take up 1 through 4."

In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
ok well do you use your handicap to keep score during play? or do you take strokes off at the end, and do the ratings correspond at ALL to strokes given?

Yes, you use your course handicap to to determine how many strokes you get on a particular hole.

course handicap = handicap index * slope rating /113 for example, if your handicap is 36.4 and the slope rating for the tees you are playing is 122, then your course handicap would be 39. The scorecard of the course rates the holes from hardest (1) to easiest (18) to let you know where to apply your handicap strokes. Apply your course handicap in order of the holes from hardest to easiest. For example, if your course handicap is 4, then you get one stroke on hole 1, one stroke on hole 2, one stroke on hole 3, one stroke on hole 4, and no other strokes. If your course handicap is greater than 18, then you start over. For example, if your course handicap is 19, then you get 2 strokes on the hardest hole, and 1 stroke on the other 17 holes.

Posted
ooooo ok gotcha tha helps alot, Ive always asked people but they couldnt give me a proper explanation, I plan on playing in a league next season and wanted to understand how it worked before hand lol thanks alot guys it makes complete sense to me now

r7 draw driver 9.5* stiff shaft
Big bertha 06 irons, 4-sw
56*vokey spin milled 10*bounce
Victoria ;)
tp black balls cart bagJack nicklaus Golden Bear 52* and 60* wedgesWalter hagen: 3 wood 5 wood 4 hybrid stiff shaft"I don't say my golf game is bad, but if I grew tomatoes they'd come up sliced."www...


Posted
ooooo ok gotcha tha helps alot, Ive always asked people but they couldnt give me a proper explanation, I plan on playing in a league next season and wanted to understand how it worked before hand lol thanks alot guys it makes complete sense to me now

No worries. The reason people couldn't explain it to you is because (in my experience), very few people actually understand how to use it correctly.

Now just make sure you understand Equitable Stroke Control and you'll be good to go.

Posted
The #1 handicap hole is supposed to be the toughest on the course, and the #18 handicap hole the easiest.

FYI, not necessarily. See this thread:

http://thesandtrap.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12465 , in which iacas points out:
That's incorrect, though it's commonly believed.

Also:

Because par fives offer more chances to "screw up" and because par threes offer less, par threes often occupy slots 15 through 18 while par fives often take up 1 through 4.

Hmm, that may be true in general but it's not the case at any of the courses I regularly play. Par 3s can be particularly well-guarded and/or long, increasing their difficulty. Also, while par 5s do give you more chances to screw up, they also give you more chances for saves: With par 3s you only have one chance for a good full stroke, whereas with par 5s you can have 2 crappy shots and make up for it with one good one. In fact I tend to play par 5s better than par 4s (as long as they aren't crazy long), because my approach shots to the green on the par 5s are usually shorter.

- Bill

Bill


  • Administrator
Posted
FYI, not necessarily.

You're aware that I'm the one who wrote "generally the hardest" and "more chances to screw up" and all that, right?

Those are, as you said, generalizations. Yes, generally, the par threes are 15-18 and the par fives are 1-4. Or they're close. But really, truly, deeply, if a course has done a proper, thorough evaluation (which includes submitting something like 200+ scorecards from players of a wide variety of skill levels), then the handicap assignments are quite literally a method of assigning strokes where they're needed most. A lot of courses "cheap out" and assign strokes to the par fives first, then the hard par fours, medium, easy, and the par threes. They're generally pretty close to correct. But yeah, technically, it's done via analyzing scorecards to see where higher handicap players need strokes most.
Par 3s can be particularly well-guarded and/or long, increasing their difficulty. Also, while par 5s do give you more chances to screw up, they also give you more chances for saves: With par 3s you only have one chance for a good full stroke, whereas with par 5s you can have 2 crappy shots and make up for it with one good one.

Another general rule, this one of my own devising:

Handicap = 10: Par fives give you more opportunity to screw up. The lower your handicap, the more you like par fives. If you're an 18, you tend to prefer par threes, because you only really have to make one good swing. On a par five, you've gotta make three good swings, and odds are one of them won't be pretty. Bill, if you're a 23, you're the exception that proves the rule.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
wow, i was JUST about to post about this today, I knew that it was supposed to mean 1 = hardest and 18 = easiest, but I was confused since i know when watching the PGA they always do great on par 5s and the shorter holes often are trouble.

The fact that it isnt the EASIEST but easier or hrader based on where higher handicaps need more help makes a lot more sense.

Overall though... a person COULD just subtract their handicap at the end and come up with the same results right? It would just be signifcant if you were playing match play to take them off the correct holes when competing?

Adams Golf Idea a2 OS Hybrids
(all but the 3iron, I broke it )


Posted
You're aware that I'm the one who wrote "generally the hardest" and "more chances to screw up" and all that, right?

Yes, not sure why that's relevant though - just sharing my opinions in response. Note that we're talking about 2 different issues here - what determines a hole's handicap number (we agree it's not necessarily the difficulty of the hole), and relative difficulty of par3s vs par 5s (not sure I agree that the par5s are inherently more difficult, at least not in my experience).

Bill, if you're a 23, you're the exception that proves the rule.

It could just be the courses I play have shorter par 5s than average.

Bill


Note: This thread is 6564 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
    • I don't think that is true at all. That is off-topic here, I think. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.