Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

"The Art of the Short Game" by Stan Utley


Note: This thread is 1449 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
Discuss "The Art of the Short Game" by Stan Utley.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Very easy to read and very helpful. Inside 40 yards is much more simple now. The only thing I disagree with in his book is the sand shots, I find myself still opening the club face up and opening my stance a little. I haven't read any of Pelz' books, but I did see his clock method on the Bobby Jones infomercial (bored) and it seemed pretty simple to me. I use that from 50-100 yards out or so. Overall, both Stan Utley books are pure genius. Very simple, it's not a novel (each are like 100 pages with pictures) and you can see instant results with both (especially if you were as bad as I was with putting/chipping).
  • Thumbs Up 1

Driver: Tour Burner 10.5*
3 Wood: Hibore 15*
3 Hybrid: 3dx DC 20*
Irons: i5 4-PW
Gap Wedge: cg12 50*Sand Wedge: cg12 54*Putter: g5i anserIn my grom bag :)


Posted
Very easy to read and very helpful. Inside 40 yards is much more simple now. The only thing I disagree with in his book is the sand shots, I find myself still opening the club face up and opening my stance a little. I haven't read any of Pelz' books, but I did see his clock method on the Bobby Jones infomercial (bored) and it seemed pretty simple to me. I use that from 50-100 yards out or so. Overall, both Stan Utley books are pure genius. Very simple, it's not a novel (each are like 100 pages with pictures) and you can see instant results with both (especially if you were as bad as I was with putting/chipping).

I like his sand technique. I dont like the very open stance and wide open clubface. It gives me no confidence. Stan's technique works like a charm for me when I understand the texture and firmness of the sand. The key here is me. I need more experience playing different kinds of beach shots. The technique is just perfect for me.

In the bag:
905R 9.5* Fujikura Speeder S
X 15* Fujikura R
X 19* Fujikura S
4-P MP-14 TT DGS300 53* 588 Gunmetal MP series 56-14 TT wedge MP-R 60-09 Rifle SpinnerDFX Two ball Pro V1


Posted
Didn't think this was an easy read, pretty wordy in some parts. Pitching and chipping have become much easier, I was a very solid bunker player before so I am still getting used to the new method but it seems like a great read. Will be getting art of putting in the mail soon.
  • Like 1

Posted
Read it twice, and unfortunately the only thing I can put to use right now is his use of bounce on pitch shots. Instead of automatically going directly to a low chip shot, I now have an extra option on those delicate pitches around the green (i've even been able to pull off some pretty nice flop shots - even with my 54*).

I just can't seem to get his other techniques down without having practice sessions on a practice green, etc...which i dont have access to.

:P
In the bag Nike SasQuatch SuMo 10.5* {} Tiger Shark Hammerhead 3w, 5w, 3h {} Nickent 3DX Pro 5i-PW {} Titleist Vokey 250.08* {} Cleveland CG11. 54* {} Callaway X-Tour 58.11* {} Carbite Tour Classic Putter {} Titleist ProV1x


Posted
My wedges from 30-115 yards have improved dramatically this year since I read "The Art of the Short Game".

I have just started to work on his "chipping" techniques and I am becoming a believer in the teachings in this area as well. It will take me a while to get use to not opening my stance though.

I have yet to practice his sand technique yet. I don't know how I will be able adjust to getting out of the sand without opening my stance.

Over all, this is a great book with proven techniques that can help everyone's game, whether it be a beginner or experienced player.
Drive for show, putt for dough


PutterKarsten Anser2
WedgesX-Forged 52* 58*IronsX-20 tours P-3HybridX 21 stiff4-wood R9 17 mitsubishi rayon fubuki StiffDriver R9 11.5 mitsubishi rayon fubuki Stiff

  • Administrator
Posted
I have yet to practice his sand technique yet. I don't know how I will be able adjust to getting out of the sand without opening my stance.

I think you'll be surprised. The key is dropping the hands enough. The bounce REALLY comes into play then.

Watch a few bunker shots Gary Player hits. Same style.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah, I am not sure I can switch to Utley's sand method after years playing the more standard way (open stance etc..). But it is interesting hearing another opinion, and there may be some aspects of his routine that I can take away (like low hands, flat arc).
One thing about this book, I like how Utley explains why he does what he does (club needs to move more hand hands on chips, bounce needs to work in sand, etc.)

R7 TP 8.5* Fuji Speeder x-stiff (heavy,low,fade set)
975F 3W 13.5*
FX Tour Grind Nickel 3-PW +1/2", Rifle 6.5
Vokey SW 52*
CG10 LW 60* 3 dot (14* bounce) Tracy putter 35" (hit R but putt L)+ 1 club TBD...Past home courses: Unicorn GC (Stoneham, MA), Forest Creek GC (Round Rock, TX)Ball: Use...


Posted
I think you'll be surprised. The key is dropping the hands enough. The bounce REALLY comes into play then.

This is absolutely right. I was using this style and was becoming a decent sand player, and then one of my buddies convinced me to go back to the "classic" style (the one with the aim left with the body and open the face). Sand became my enemy again.

I went back to the Utley style again a few weeks ago. I noticed that right away, I wasn't leaving it in the sand anymore or blading it out and past the green. It's also useful in that, when I play at a city course with what I call "classic" bunkers during play (i.e., more dirt than sand - the way it was way back when, I imagine), if there isn't sand to support the shot, rather than hitting a really poor sand shot like I used to (when I reverted to non-Utley style), I just tend to hit the ball as if I hit it a bit fat off of grass - and I still get a pretty decent result. And when the bunker has sand, I hit great shots.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I've posted elsewhere in TST about reading Pelz' Short Game Bible and following his techniques the best I could. His short game philosphy seemed to make sense, especially the clock positions. The strokes seemed 'normal'. I'm a high single-digit handicapper, ranging from 7.1 to 8.5 over the past 6 months. My full swing distances are on the higher-than-average side of the scale. The Pelz shortgame approach seemed to work for me the past two years except for one recurring problem...I noticed most of my short shots were hitting near the heel side of the face with an occassional shank...mostly with the 7:30 swing.

I tried to fix it, but could never figure it out (I even posted my issues in TST but I never quite fixed it although I believe I was consistently coming over the top). The shanks started to occur more often and they worked their way into my pitching stroke. I also noticed I had become a terrible bunker player which wasn't always the case. I was in trouble with no confidence whatsoever, so I did something about it...

I bought Stan Utley's book in May. His techniques are unlike anything I had ever heard. I worked on learning the mechanics at the practice area for a few days then took it out on the course. My first 35 yard "pitch" was to 2 feet. Later that round, I chipped in a 25 footer from a slight depression just off the green. During the second round I made an awesome short-sided bunker shot. I decided to stick with it.

Two months later I'm completely commited to Stan's techniques. I've received compliments from fellow club members and strangers about how good I'm chipping and pitching. (I let a few of them in on my secret). Most importantly, I'm making contact near the center of the face now. I've had zero shanks. I have confidence once again.

I thought I would continue to use Pelz' clock system, and I suppose I am to some extent, but I find I'm relying more on feel when it's actually time to make the shot.

Stan's book is a simple read. It may go against some of your beliefs, especially ball position, weight distribution at setup, and postion of the butt-end of the club throughout. The strokes are easy to learn, similar to each other, and repeatable IMO. I would almost guarantee you've never seen his bunker technique.

I'd recommend this book for anyone who hasn't become proficient at the short game (although you've tried) whether you're new to the game or have been playing for years but just can't seem to improve that short game.

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Though his sand technique sounded foreign to me, after trying it bit, I am now thinking I want to continue. I was getting the ball out in control pretty effortlessly, but I was getting a lower trajectory than I am used to. I guess I still need to tinker.
If you haven't read his sand technique, check it out. Be aware: It is NOT what most people teach.

R7 TP 8.5* Fuji Speeder x-stiff (heavy,low,fade set)
975F 3W 13.5*
FX Tour Grind Nickel 3-PW +1/2", Rifle 6.5
Vokey SW 52*
CG10 LW 60* 3 dot (14* bounce) Tracy putter 35" (hit R but putt L)+ 1 club TBD...Past home courses: Unicorn GC (Stoneham, MA), Forest Creek GC (Round Rock, TX)Ball: Use...


Posted
Though his sand technique sounded foreign to me, after trying it bit, I am now thinking I want to continue. I was getting the ball out in control pretty effortlessly, but I was getting a lower trajectory than I am used to. I guess I still need to tinker.

Is it the dropping of ones hands and squatting down low that forces your left hand to cup (hitting bunker shots)? I'm having a hard time getting it to feel right for me.

:P
In the bag Nike SasQuatch SuMo 10.5* {} Tiger Shark Hammerhead 3w, 5w, 3h {} Nickent 3DX Pro 5i-PW {} Titleist Vokey 250.08* {} Cleveland CG11. 54* {} Callaway X-Tour 58.11* {} Carbite Tour Classic Putter {} Titleist ProV1x


Posted

I really like Utley's perspectives and have tried to use them on course (as much as you can when there are 27 swing thoughts at any one time ).

I also bought and read his other book "The Art of Putting" and have found that his points in regards to set-up, feel and grip to be fantastic. I have a much better feel of the ball off the putter face now and am slowly bring the 36.5 putts per round average down!

What I play:
Titleist 909D2 9.5 Matrix Ozik xcon 6 | Ping i15 14 Axivcore Tour Red | Ping i15 hybrid 17 Axivcore Tour Red | Titleist AP2 TTDGS300 | Vokey 52.08 SM 58.12 | Scotty Cameron Studio Stainless Newport 2 | Titleist ProV1x
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Is it the dropping of ones hands and squatting down low that forces your left hand to cup (hitting bunker shots)? I'm having a hard time getting it to feel right for me.

Yes, but I feel the biggest contributing factors to the wrist cup is keeping the right arm/elbow close to your right side on the backswing and keeping your weight on the left side.

This action doesn't allow your arms to extend properly like they need to during a normal full swing so to compensate, your left wrist must cup. You have to feel the reverse pivot or this shot will not work (keep weight on the left side).

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
This action doesn't allow your arms to extend properly like they need to during a normal full swing so to compensate, your left wrist must cup. You have to feel the reverse pivot or this shot will not work (keep weight on the left side).

I put up a video of my attempt of an Utley sand shot in this thread:

http://thesandtrap.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15487 I am doing it like a drill he suggests in the book 1. cock wrist up 2. pivot around left leg. I think my main problem is dropping my R shoulder right now. I like the effortless motion in the sand though.

R7 TP 8.5* Fuji Speeder x-stiff (heavy,low,fade set)
975F 3W 13.5*
FX Tour Grind Nickel 3-PW +1/2", Rifle 6.5
Vokey SW 52*
CG10 LW 60* 3 dot (14* bounce) Tracy putter 35" (hit R but putt L)+ 1 club TBD...Past home courses: Unicorn GC (Stoneham, MA), Forest Creek GC (Round Rock, TX)Ball: Use...


Posted
What's the actual problem? Your grip looked a little to 'strong' but everything else looked pretty good. I find I have to keep that left shoulder down to get the ball up.

(Maybe I should ask this question on the other thread).

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I bought The Art of the Short Game a couple of months ago, read it in an evening and couldn't wait to get out to the course and try it. I found the reading easy and some of it I was already incorporating into my short game but needed something to "jar" my game as it had grown rather stagnant and scores seemed to bottom out. Anyway, the techniques take some getting used to and I found myself having to really think about the shots more than usual on the course but that is decreasing the more I practice. The sand technique provided immediate and significant benefits to my bunker play and my ball dispersion around the holes at my club's practice facility tightened dramatically with these shots as well as chips and pitches. I've had some trouble taking it to the course but I think that is more mental than anything in that one really must trust that it works (which it does). All in all I'm thrilled with what I'm seeing and am finding enjoyment in some shots that had quite frankly become frustrating and/or boring.

Incidentally, I also purchased The Art of Putting a couple of weeks later because I liked the short game book so much and am equally impressed. I have more trouble with putting than the shots covered in The Art of the Short Game so it is taking me longer to acclimate but I expect that over time good results will surface.
ITB
Ping Si3 10* Grafalloy Blue
Mizuno F-60 13.5* Exsar FS3
Mizuno CLK FLI-HI 17* Exsar HS2
Mizuno MP-67 4-PW DG S300Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 58Bobby Jones 64Titleist Cameron Stainless Newport 2Titleist ProV1x

Posted
I'm almost finished with it now.

It's a good book. My short game was previously a mixture of a lot of different things. My chipping style was pretty similar to what Utley teaches but my pitching was different and my sand style 180 degrees different.

I haven't had a chance to practice or play with his sand techniques yet, as the course I typically play has no bunkers. My chipping feels more refined and I'm more confident with it.

The real difference for me, though, has been with pitch shots. I'm much better now than I've ever been. The other thing I got out of his book was that FINALLY, someone helped me to understand bounce in the clubhead properly, and how it worked.

Case in point: I went out this past week and hit only 6 of 14 fairways and only 2 of 18 greens, but still shot 92 (with 32 putts and only 1 three-putt) because my short game kept me out of the 100s.

Jess

Note: This thread is 1449 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.