Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6544 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
The last 20 scores that affect my handicap. We are a week and a half away from the next revision for my association.

I 7/14/08 85 69.4/120 14.7
I 7/9/0887 69.4/12016.6
H 6/19/0890 69.4/12019.4
I 6/16/0887 69.4/12016.6
* I 6/4/0885 69.4/12014.7
I 6/3/0887 69.4/12016.6
* H 5/22/0882 69.4/12011.9
* I 5/18/0886 71.5/12712.9
AI 5/17/0891 71.5/12717.4
* I 5/12/0885 69.4/12014.7
T 5/10/0892 69.4/12021.3
* H 4/30/0881 69.4/12010.9
AI 4/29/0891 70.4/11919.6
* I 4/28/0886 69.4/12015.6
T 4/20/0887 69.4/12016.6
* T 4/19/0881 66.4/11114.9
I 4/18/0886 69.4/12015.6
I 4/15/0886 69.4/12015.6
* I 4/12/0883 69.4/12012.8
* I 4/8/0879 69.4/1209.0

The British and Australian systems work when all players are members of a club. Here in the US you can maintain a handicap even if you don't belong to a club by joining as an associate. In that way your handicap is maintained without the necessity of paying for a costly club membership.

In my case, I'm a member of a Men's club at a public golf course, and we don't have the luxury of having weekly medals or comps. We hold 15 tournaments a season, plus 5 match play tournaments which run the entire season long. As a busy public facility we are lucky to get that many play dates, and getting open time slots to play weekly medals just isn't going to happen. With the US system it gives a great many golfers the opportunity to maintain a handicap who wouldn't have that chance of we were locked into the type of system that you have. It also makes our handicaps more portable, as they can easily be applied to courses other than our home base.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This system which equals our system in Germany makes it incredible difficult to reach scratch or beyond when you only get 0.1 per stroke you underplay your hcp once you reached 4hcp. You basically need to shoot 40 under par (of your current hcp) to get to 0 and never play worse, which of course is impossible!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the system you describe, you have to shoot 40 under par across all of your rounds. For instance, if you are 4-handicap and you shoot 10 rounds this month at even-par, you have shot 40 strokes below your handicap. And if they do a monthly adjustment, you would be at scratch. Similarly, if you shot 20 rounds at two-over that month, you would be cut 40 x 0.1 = 4 shots to scratch.

Or am I getting it wrong? //Anand

--
Tee it high, let it fly!

MP-600, Fujikura E360 Stiff
Hi-Bore 1i, 2i, Stiff MP-57, DG S300 52.08, 56.08., 60.07 FISHER GOLF - CTS-1 Burgandy Insert ProV1


Posted
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the system you describe, you have to shoot 40 under par across all of your rounds. For instance, if you are 4-handicap and you shoot 10 rounds this month at even-par, you have shot 40 strokes below your handicap. And if they do a monthly adjustment, you would be at scratch. Similarly, if you shot 20 rounds at two-over that month, you would be cut 40 x 0.1 = 4 shots to scratch.

First - only rounds in tournaments count - so on your local course you might play a tourney ever 1 1/2 on average. After each tournament you hand in a scorecard. We mostly play stableford system. Lets take the case of a 4hcp and assume his hcp is level with the course rating so is doesnt get any strokes. He shoots a 72 this day (40 stablefords) - his new handicap is 3.6. Next time he shoots a 72 again - his new handicap 3.2. Next time he shoots 76 (35 stablefords) - nothing happens to his handicap Next time he shoots 77 (34 stablefords) - his new handicap 3.3 (+0.1 - maximum that the handicap increases where 34 stablefords is the limit) So every handicap is calculated after every tournament and adjusted and registered with the golf association. And the next time you play you play with your new handicap already. So in my case e.g - i had 10.2 on Sunday - shot 42 stablefords (6over par) and had to play with 9.0 today. When your home course is though and wont allow to go really low (i calc. the average of the EPD-tour players who made the cut this year and they shot 72.1 as avg. and they played much better than last year) it just takes endless to reach scratch. From all our best amateurs i NEVER saw a round better than 2 under par - and some of them are plus hcp - so go figure...

Burner 9°
FW Burner 15°
Burner Rescue 19°
MP67 4-PW
CG10 50° CG12 DSG 54° & 60°


Note: This thread is 6544 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
    • I don't think that is true at all. That is off-topic here, I think. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.