Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6349 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My driver just recently broke. I was thinking of purchasing a Titleist 975D Driver. I looked and it said that it was only 260cc. I thought that would be way too small compared too other drivers (460cc). But then I thought too myself, "I hit my fairway woods much straighter off of the tee". So I was thinking that if I got a smaller head on my driver, that I might eliminate my slice a little. Plus, I'd save some green (It's only $15). Tips are appreciated. Thanks.

Posted
I have a 400cc driver and I lose about 20-25 yards compared to other 460cc drivers that I have used.

I will eventually upgrade to a 460cc as soon as I find one I like. I just cant get over the head size.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Posted
My driver just recently broke. I was thinking of purchasing a Titleist 975D Driver. I looked and it said that it was only 260cc. I thought that would be way too small compared too other drivers (460cc). But then I thought too myself, "I hit my fairway woods much straighter off of the tee". So I was thinking that if I got a smaller head on my driver, that I might eliminate my slice a little. Plus, I'd save some green (It's only $15). Tips are appreciated. Thanks.

I purchased one awhile ago when I was having serious issues with my sumo2. I actually gained some distance with the 975D - it is a heavier club - but my distance gain couldve been from me fixing some flaws with my swing.

You are paying about what I did so it is a steal at that price.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The bigger the head, the better. The reason why you dont slice your fairway woods is likely more because of the shorter shaft, not the smaller head.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted
I hit my G2 a good 15-20 yards farther than my old Cobra SS350 which i hit 10 yard farther than my callaway big bertha. That said I used to bomb the 975j farther than my cobra so take it for what thats worth. I didnt notice any better or worse accuracy with any of them.

Its $15 get it and if it sucks then get something else is my suggestion.

Posted
If you concentrate the mass behind the ball you'll get more momentum. Bigger heads are forgiving if you need forgiveness. My professional says he'd lower every player's handicap by 2 strokes by taking the driver right out of the bag.

Taylormade Driver HT
Taylormade 3 HT

Mcgregor 7w
Vulcan irons 5-P
Solus 53 61

Vokey 56

Scotty Caneron Flange/ Ping Cushin

Srixon ZStar

71 gold tees

bring cash


Posted
I just bought a Taylormade 260cc driver and a Callaway GBB 250cc driver. I always slice with anything bigger than 360cc, so I stick to the smaller drivers.

Driver: Hyper X Tour 10.5* Graffalloy Prolaunch Blue Stiff Shaft
Hybrid: Acer Select 5000 16* Ping Cushin Stiff Shaft
Irons: NDS 3-PW (missing #7, replaced with clone) True Temper Uniflex SpeedStep Shaft
Wedges: Acer XK Tour 56*10 Precision Stiff Shaft, Revolution 60*10 True Temper Wedgeflex


Posted
$15, how can you go wrong. The 975D has a small sweet spot, maybe the size of a quarter, but you can't beat the price.

On ebay there was a Taylor Made R540xd driver 400cc that sold for $31 plus $12 shipping cost for a total of $43 - $15 and for $28 more you can buy a driver that many low handicap golfer are still using today.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
$15, how can you go wrong. The 975D has a small sweet spot, maybe the size of a quarter, but you can't beat the price.

My dad has that driver. He got it for $60 about 6 months ago and he refuses to get anything else. He loves it.

What I Play:

Driver: Sasquatch SUMO² 9.5º Stiff
Hybrid: HiBore 16º (3W replacement)
Irons: Staff Ci6 3-PW StiffWedges: Vokey Spin Milled 54.10 60.04Putter: Newport Studio Style 35"Ball: Pro V1xAge: 15

Posted
For that price its the bang for a buck. But if you spend more money and get like 440cc or 460cc clubs it helps way more then a 260cc head if you got the GREEN

Driver: Titleist D2, 9.5* loft, Aldila VooDoo XS, IOMIC Grip Red
Fairway: Titleist 906 F2, 13* and 18* loft, Fujikura 757 Tour Spec. XS, IOMIC Grip Black
Irons: Callaway Tour Authentic Prototype 3-9, Project X 6.5, IOMIC Grip Black
Wedges: Titleist Vokey 48*, Titleist Proto Vokey 52*, Titleist...


Posted
That is not sound advice a driver isnt better just because the head is bigger.

How do? The bigger the head, the bigger the sweetspot. The bigger the sweetspot, the more likely you are to hit solid, straight drives.

I dont know about you, but with how bad my golfswing is some days, I take the biggest sweetspot I can get!

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted
Or you can wait for the Titleist D2 or D1. Since titleist is going to release the new 909 drivers out in october you can buy your $20 club right now and wait for the D2 OR D1 to drop down

Driver: Titleist D2, 9.5* loft, Aldila VooDoo XS, IOMIC Grip Red
Fairway: Titleist 906 F2, 13* and 18* loft, Fujikura 757 Tour Spec. XS, IOMIC Grip Black
Irons: Callaway Tour Authentic Prototype 3-9, Project X 6.5, IOMIC Grip Black
Wedges: Titleist Vokey 48*, Titleist Proto Vokey 52*, Titleist...


Posted
I played the 975D today, really small driver but it gives me that some sort of confidence. Its kinda heavy so it actually feels really good, and the size of the head really doesn't effect anything at adress. It looks sweet.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
I love the older titleist, like Dent said, it's very confidence inspiring at address.
And i don't believe size has a massive affect on distance. Maybe 5-10 yards, but nothing major. I just got a 400cc 905T driver, still big, but smaller than most, and I hit it further than my dad's 905R. If i found the driver you found for 15 dollars, id buy it just to hit it on the range for fun.
In The Bag

Titleist 905T 9.5°
Nike Sumo2 15°
Nike Sumo2 19°Nike Forged Irons - 3-PW Titleist Bob Vokey Spin Milled 56°10°Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum Newport 2

Posted
How do? The bigger the head, the bigger the sweetspot. The bigger the sweetspot, the more likely you are to hit solid, straight drives.

Thats fine I undestand all that but it doesnt automatically make it a better club just because the head is 460cc instead of 425cc or whatever. And its very possible to hit the sweet spot and still not hit the ball straight.


Posted
If you're going to get a driver with a head that small, why not just a 3 wood or 5 wood off the tee? Honestly, not much difference.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
That is not sound advice a driver isnt better just because the head is bigger.

I will agree with this. I have tried a number of newer, bigger drivers in the last year or so. I always go back to my 983E. Until I find something that I can hit straighter and further I will continue to use it. I am going to stop trying out the new drivers until something comes out that is smaller (maybe the 909 D3?) Personally, I think that the head size is out of control. Not everyone wants a 460cc driver, but that is about all you can find anymore.

To answer the OP...for $15 give it a shot. If it has the right shaft in it, it may be perfect. Can't beat the price. I probably have $15 in my penny jar at home.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Note: This thread is 6349 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.