Jump to content
IGNORED

Paula will win the Safeway


PEZGolf
Note: This thread is 5729 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I think Lorena has lost some focus this year because of some family issues and that she does not seem as motivated as in the past. One interview I heard sticks with me where she stated something like she wasn't sure if she would be on tour after 5 years because she had other things she would like to accomplish. It just made me feel that she is one her way out.

You are right---to be at the top takes a TOTAL dedication. After a time, some players get "burned out", or have other interests. Annika has made the right move in retiring. She said that she wanted to start a family and "pursue other interests". There is no point in playing in tournaments where you are just "showing up". If you are a top player and do not have the burning desire to win, it is best to do what Byron Nelson, Bob Jones, and Annika decided---retire.

And this brings up an interesting question. Tiger Woods said in an interview that when his game gets to the point that he does not feel that he can win, he will "walk away from the game". He plays to win; that is his motivation. If his knee does not allow him to regain his past form, and he becomes "just one of the guys", will he keep playing? He said that he would not.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think in the case of a lot of the LPGA players is that they reach a point in their lives where family is more important than golf.
You know, they play pretty well for a few years, make a bunch of money and they get to the point where being a wife and a mother is more important than being a golf champion.
I think it takes a much greater toll on their golf career than it does the guys in the PGA because obviously being a parent takes a much greater toll on a woman's body than it does a man's.
For the guys, they can keep playing right up until he baby is born, hop on a plane and be there for the kid's birth and then hop right back on a plan and play at the next week's event. Obviously, its not that easy for the ladies.
Clearly, Ochoa has some personal issues that have been going on, which no doubt have distracted her from her golf game. Annika wants to start a family and has chosen to walk away from the game. She did say that she might play in some of the majors, but that as far as playing full-time, she is done. I respect her decision.
Bottom line, I just want these ladies to be happy. If being a pro golfer makes them happy, great. If being a wife and mother is more important and they want to walk away from the game, thats fine too. Whatever makes them feel happiest and most fufilled in their lives is all that matters.
Granted, Id be disappointed if Paula ever made that choice (unless of course I was going to be the father of her kids...hint, hint, Paula) but Id respect her decision and would still be a Paula Creamer fan.
As to Tiger, if his knee doesnt come back 100% and he isnt able to be competitive, I think he would retire. I dont see Tiger being OK with just showing up and finishing 30th or worse all the time.
Its not as if he needs the money.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bottom line, I just want these ladies to be happy. If being a pro golfer makes them happy, great. If being a wife and mother is more important and they want to walk away from the game, thats fine too. Whatever makes them feel happiest and most fufilled in their lives is all that matters.

I agree. The worst thing that can happen is that a golfer stays out there, without full motivation, and fades into the sunset. Some do stay motivated. Look at Juli Inkster, Helen Alfredsson, Meg Mallon, and some of the "oldies". They are still "fired up", and Juli and Helen are having good years. You are 100% correct in your statement about the differences between men and women touring pros and raising their families. It is very tough on the women, as Laura Diaz has commented on, since she gave birth to her son, Cooper.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree. The worst thing that can happen is that a golfer stays out there, without full motivation, and fades into the sunset. Some do stay motivated. Look at Juli Inkster, Helen Alfredsson, Meg Mallon, and some of the "oldies". They are still "fired up", and Juli and Helen are having good years. You are 100% correct in your statement about the differences between men and women touring pros and raising their families. It is very tough on the women, as Laura Diaz has commented on, since she gave birth to her son, Cooper.

Absolutely. Theres nothing stopping some of these younger LPGA players from having kids when they are in the mid to late 20s and them coming back in 10 years and playing just as well as they ever had.

Lately we have seen that even players in their 40s can still compete at the highest levels. Look at Vijay Singh, I think he is in his mid 40s and he is playing as good as anyone as of late.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5729 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • 1. Hale Irwin. Don't need to go through numerous other examples. https://vault.si.com/vault/1995/02/06/hale-and-hearty 2.I don't care what former athletes say, I don't care what Jack says on any topic.   But as a matter of record. Jack has never said the top guys he played with in the 70s would struggle in the 90s.  He in fact said the opposite. He said the guys Tiger faced at the top were weaker an after some hurt feelings with Ernie Els took it back.  He's even said Bobby Jones would do well.  It doesn't make him right but it what he said. 3. I am factoring in competition.    The odds Tiger would have 37 top 2s over the same span are zero. The odds he would have had 30 top 2s over the same time are not good.  You can make the emojis and insults you want. It is your site. But the odds are zero. And not zero as in it is an opinion or there is some uncertainty. It is zero as in it is an impossibility for him to have 37 top 2s.              
    • Lemieux would’ve had his ass handed to him out there! He’d be lucky to even score 5 goals a season back then!
    • Poppycock! It was just as difficult to score goals in this video as it is now: It was just as difficult to finish T5 in a major in 1966 as it is in 2006, too. Those ten-year-olds, errrr, club pros and part-time "tour" players were every bit as good as the guys who, today, have been playing high level golf since they were children.
    • @GolfSwami When you choose to completely ignore the facts and mathematics of Tiger’s dominance over Jack, I find it hard to believe you have no emotional tie to this. SOF HAS to be factored. Hell, you’re so fond of using other sports….SOS is a huge determinant in the NCAA Football playoffs. Gee, why wasn’t UCF the number one team when they went 13-0? That’s crazy right!?😜
    • Best and Greatest are synonyms IMO. Yep. Longevity is a stupid way to determine something like this. If someone took 30 years to amass a certain record, and someone else accomplished the same thing or more in ten years, the second player is better. Golf wasn't nearly as athletic, as taxing, or as well paid, when Jack played. Careers were longer. It's becoming more explosive, with shorter careers. Guys hit more balls now, train harder now, etc. Dude, 14/10 vs. 5/4 is not remotely the same as 18/72 vs. 15/82. It requires context. Jack was playing against club pros. I agree - Tiger blows Jack's record out of the water when you adjust for field strength. 😉  We agree again: Tiger might have won 30 majors. 🤣 Ha ha ha ha ha ha. No, dude. No, it's not "wrong" and the fields were significantly shallower and weaker when Jack played. Pretend Jack amassed his record against ten-year-olds. How impressive would that be? There's context. Jack amassed his record against significantly weaker/shallower competition. This has all been discussed a hundred times. As it would be if he played against ten-year-olds. Compare Tiger's SG in the PGA Championships against only the club pros and let me know how that shakes out. Strokes gained is against the competition at the time. Competition. Jack strongly disagrees with you, and you're casually leaving off the 2000s, too. No, they weren't. Once in a great while they popped up, but no, they weren't. Given all of the conversation that's been had in this topic, this ranks as one of the dumbest posts ever in this topic. If it was made in the first ten pages, cool. But, no. You made it on page 390-something. Try this on for size: every one of Tiger's 82 PGA Tour wins faced stronger/deeper fields than any of Jack's major victories. I also don't really care about top-tens in majors. 15 x > 18 y, where x and y are the respective strength/depth of field. It may be coherent, but so is someone saying 2 + 2 = 7 or someone trying to explain chemtrails. You can understand what they're trying to say, but it can still be a bad, lousy argument. This implies that I do. I do not. I've made the mathematical argument throughout. You're literally counting things with little to no regard for the freaking competition. Guess what: NHL scoring went down when goalies got more pads and learned to take away more parts of the net by learning to go butterfly, etc. The competition changed, and so scoring records aren't the same now as when Wayne Gretzky played most of his hockey. Because the competition is different now. Neither is someone trying to say that 2 + 2 = 7 or that the earth is flat. I can comprehend what they're saying, but they're still a wacko. Dude.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...