Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Michael Campbell Update RE Exempt Status


Note: This thread is 7395 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Greetings ..

Well, Well, Well - Isn't THIS Special !!

It turns out that Michael Campbell's restricted status is not as restricted as many may have first thought - including this author!

According to this 1-13-2006 GOLFWORLD News Article , Campbell does have the opportunity to become a Special Temporary Member in 2006, and thus be eligible for unlimited sponsor invitations. And he will also have the opportunity to join the PGA Tour as a bona fide full-time member in 2007.

Now to gain Special Temporary Membership in 2006, Campbell must earn at least as much money as the 150th player on the 2005 Official Money List, which was Thomas Levet, with $485,343. Campbell's off to a very good start in this regard, having earned $287,500 at the season-opening Mercedes Championships. The next PGA Tour stop for the Kiwi is the Accenture Match Play in late February, where the first immediate goal is to get as far as the quarterfinals. A finish that high is worth at least $240,000 , and that would "seal the deal".

Thanx-A-Lot, Frank-0-Sport

Posted
Greetings ...

To refresh your memories --

As a non-member in 2002, Michael Campbell earned well in excess of the 125th player on the Regular Members' Official Money List. He was therefore eligible to join the PGA Tour as a full regular member for 2003, and he did so.

Unfortunately, Campbell couldn't quite fit the minimum 15 official PGA Tour events into his schedule, so at the end of 2003 the PGA Tour imposed a five-year restriction penalty.

As an absolute pure non-member (as opposed to a Special Temporary, or a full-time member) , Campbell was restricted to 10 official events (IE, any event where the victory and the money is deemed official) per year from 2004 thru 2008.

For 2006, Campbell is playing these 10 "official" events - the four Grand Slam Majors, the Players Championship, the three official World Golf Championships plus two "Regular" PGA Tour Events -- the already-played Mercedes Championships, where he tied for 3rd and earned $287,500; and the upcoming Bay Hill Invitational.

To set the record straight, Campbell isn't complaining so much that the PGA Tour imposed the 10-event limitation on him in the first place. He's more upset that his US Open win doesn't grant him entry into two or three more events.

And Campbell has not asked for the Sun, Moon and the Stars. He's asked ONLY for the right to play at Jack Nicklaus' Memorial Tournament and the Barclays-Westchester Classic, both of which occur right before the 2006 US Open. That's All!

Let me add my 2 cents here --

(1) I take issue with the 10-event limitation because it includes events that are not under the PGA Tour's control - specificly the four Grand Slam Majors. If at the very least the PGA Tour had elected to leave the Majors out of the 10-event equation, Campbell would had have the two events he wanted plus, if he elected, two extra events. And no complaints whatsoever!

(2) Even with this restriction in effect, Campbell still has the opportunity to achieve Special Temporary Membership in 2006, which would allow him to add more events to his schedule. Furthermore, he can do in 2007 or beyond what overseas commitments have prevented him from doing in 2006 - join the PGA Tour full-time, using his 2005 US Open win for exempt status.

So, what good is the restriction if there are ways out of it ??

(3) Even if the restriction were not in effect, and Campbell had not elected to join the PGA Tour full-time for 2006, he would have started the year off just as he actually has - as an absolute pure non-member. The only difference being that he would have been eligible for at least five more PGA Tour events thru sponsor invitations. That's really just about all the "Restriction" has cost him.

(4) If Campbell played 2006 as a non-member with or without restriction, but decided not to join the PGA Tour full-time in 2007, then he'd start from scratch again!

Thanx-A-Lot, Frank-0-Sport

Note: This thread is 7395 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Haiduk - Archdevil        
    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
    • I managed to knock off a 3, a 13, and a 15 a couple of weeks ago. The 3 was a 185 yard par 3 with a 6 iron to 12 feet. 13 was a 350 yard par 4, which was a 2 iron and a 9 iron to about a foot. 15 was a 560 yard par 5 with a driver in a bunker, 4 iron into the semi, gap wedge to 8 feet and a putt.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.