Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6282 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm looking for a new putter and have been changing my mind on a daily basis. I have narrowed it down to 3. Rife Mr.Beasley, Yes! Marilyn or Taylor made Rossa Suzuka. I tried the rife out on the course today (my club pro stocks them) and liked it. I have only been able to demo the Yes and TM on the astro turf at the stores though. Opinions very welcome.
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 9.5˚
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 15˚
adams.gif A7 17˚
adams.gif Idea Pro 3-PW
mizuno.gif MP T-11 52˚, MP T-10 58˚  cameron.gif Red X  titleist.gif NXT

Posted
From one of my previous posts.

I had a Yes!. It putted great in the store. It hit GREAT when you hit it perfect. For me an "off" hit would mangle the shot pretty badly. Also, I just could not get the distance right with the club. I *think* it has to do with the way the C Grooves are positioned. It could also be that I had been hitting a Odyssey XG Rossie and was used to the insert. But, I'm just a knucklehead 22 HCP so it's hard to say for sure. I do know that I ended up returning the club and taking a %10 hit at Golfsmith to do so.

I'm not saying the Yes! is crap, it just wasn't a good putter for me. For a lot of others it is working great.

That said, hitting it "right" really made me a believer in the groove technology, so I went and tested a Rife 2 bar hybrid. It has a grooved insert where the grooves run uniformly accross the entire face. I am putting MUCH better with the Rife. Better than I did with the Rossie I used for two years.


All *that* said, I just bought a used Rossa Spider to fool around with too.. And it *seems* to be hitting as good or better than the Rife, but I've only had it for a day...

I'm thinking of changing my board name to "Putter Ho".
Drivers:
FT-i Draw 9* W/Grafalloy Red
Sumo2 5900 9.5* W/Grafalloy Red

Irons: A3OS 3-PW Graphite/Steel regularWedges: A3OS GW, SW, LWPutter: Rossa Monza SpiderLittle round white thing:

Posted
I have been leaving putts quite a way short recently, do you think the better roll from the grooves on the rife and Yes would help getting the ball to the hole better? I am leaning towards the yes putter at the moment.
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 9.5˚
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 15˚
adams.gif A7 17˚
adams.gif Idea Pro 3-PW
mizuno.gif MP T-11 52˚, MP T-10 58˚  cameron.gif Red X  titleist.gif NXT

Posted
Absolutely. The roll of the ball off the face is pretty incredible. I found another post I did on my Rife

I have one and like it so far. It hits straight and is pretty forgiving. The center shaft isn't fully centered so you can line it up without distraction. It's got adjustable weights but I find I like the consistency of one weight.

The roll is amazing and true, but can actually throw you off a little. I've been using a white hot Rossie for the past few years. Between the softer feel of the Rossie insert and the better roll of the Rife I'm totally blowing through breaks... Without hitting very hard. So, I'll blow through a break and then get scared and miss the 2nd short. It's taking some getting used to, but I think when I do, it will be fun.


As always, YMMV. It should also be said that I was using the Tiffany. The grooved area is much smaller than on some of the other yes putters whcih may also account for my trouble with it...
Drivers:
FT-i Draw 9* W/Grafalloy Red
Sumo2 5900 9.5* W/Grafalloy Red

Irons: A3OS 3-PW Graphite/Steel regularWedges: A3OS GW, SW, LWPutter: Rossa Monza SpiderLittle round white thing:

Posted
Putters are such a personal thing but here is my take on the two brands in question.

I've been a putter ho recently too, although the Cameron is my staple at the moment I have been in the market for a cheap alternate blade putter as well as mallet. I did try the rife out and while by playing partner who is a junior pro swears by his 2 bar blade rife, I just could not get into the feel or look of it. I found the glare and situation of the two bars on the putter to be an unhelpful and odd alignment aid that I personally did not like. The face and the size of the putter (the blade style) in comparison to other blades was also slightly larger and I felt this cheapened the feel and thus distance control.

On the other hand the putter I was most confident with and wish I had never given away was my Yes! Sophia blade. It was small, so not much MOI or forgiveness but is had incredible touch and feel and the C-grooves were the selling point for me. I don't necessary buy into the claim that they get the ball rolling better/faster but I definitely liked them as a medium to the inserts and milled faces. Lost of feedback but soft and smooth as well. If you like the Sohia, the Nicky is another model to look into. Good luck!

Where I play: Mission Viejo CC and
long Beach Skylinks

In My Red Cleveland Club Count Bag Today;
Hibore XLS 11.5* w/ Diamana Redboard Flowerband 63 S 2009 Launcher 3WD HT 17* w/ Graffalloy Epic 87g S Hibore XLS Hybrid 22* w/ Graffalloy Epic S and 25* w/ Project X 6.0 CG2 4-PW w/ Project X 6.0 HL...


Posted
I was a putter Ho and had many putters: Rife 2 Bar Blade and Mallet, Yes! Marilyn, Nike Oz t130, Scotty Cameron Newport 2 and Bullseye blade

I didn't like the feel of the Rife.

Marilyn is great since she is forgiving. However, if you are not a solid putter, your good and bad shots go just as far & you don't develop the proper mechanics/feel. I ended up switching to the most basic putter after Marilyn.

STR8 Dymo 10.5
Dymo 3W
Mid Rescue 3
MP-33 4-PW
Eidolon 52* GW LW, SW Titleist Bullseye Putter


Posted
A local course had clearance at end of the season last year. The pro shop had both the Rife Mr Beasly and Barbados. Just to add another option for you, I'd say try the Barbados. I chose it over the Beasly. It sits square at address and it's milled (no insert compared to the hybrid). The alignment aid is great and it has a groove to make sure you have the proper address. I like the idea of the grooves on the face. It got a very favorable review in Golf magazine beating out Ping and Odyessy.

http://rifeputters.com/media/articles/2007/02/

Driver: 4DX T 10.5 Evolver w/ Redboard
Hybrids: G5: 16*, 19*, 22*
Irons: Ping Eye 2 +no+ (5-PW)
Wedges: CG12: 52/10, 56/14, 60/10
Putter: C&L flowneckBall: Z-Star


Posted

I have a Yes! Callie and while I love it, I also dislike it (sometimes).

When I'm putting good it's great, but it seems like for me anyway that if my stroke gets off by just a centimeter, I lose all feel with the putter. I don't know if anyone else with a Yes experiences this same thing but for me, it feels like the sweet spot on the putter is more toward the heel. If I line the ball up in the middle of the putter face and make contact there it feels like a toe impact. Just weird.

I'm also looking into a Rife myself. 2 Bar Hybrid or the Itsy Bitsy Spyder


Posted
Rife Barbados for me... I've never owned a Yes, but have had a Barbados for a while now - actually since they first came out....

The roll groove seems to give me a feel between the Mizuno C-04 and BC-3 that I own. It sets up very well for me...

As someone else said though, and I concur, that putters are so personal you've got to try them yourself and decide...

WTIB:
Callaway FT-9 Tour 9.5° Scads of shafts - now: Kai'li 63 stiff
Tour Edge Exotics 3 & 5 FW
Callaway X-22 Tour irons
Bobby Jones 3 & 4 hybridsRife Abaco/Odyessy Black Series i9 puttersWith a few more hangin' around


Posted
There's a good deal on a Rife in the FS section. I have no connection to the poster.
Drivers:
FT-i Draw 9* W/Grafalloy Red
Sumo2 5900 9.5* W/Grafalloy Red

Irons: A3OS 3-PW Graphite/Steel regularWedges: A3OS GW, SW, LWPutter: Rossa Monza SpiderLittle round white thing:

Posted
I have a Yes Callie, which I like ... on fast greens.

Here in the Pacific NW, we get often lush, slow greens.

Both the Yes and Rife putters have a very low loft, 2* or 1.5*.
I think that's not enough on somewhat shaggy greens, and you leave putts short all day...

TaylorMade r7 Superquad 9.5° -- RE*AX 65 S
Cobra S9-1 F 3w 15.5° -- JavlnFX M7 R
Adams Idea Pro Hybrid #3 20° -- Aldila VS Proto Hybrid 80 R
Titleist AP1 4-PW,W -- DG HL S300
Cleveland CG14 BlackPearl 54° -- Traction WedgeCleveland CG14 BlackPearl 58° -- Traction WedgeNeverCompromis...


Note: This thread is 6282 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.