Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6283 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi, first off Id like to introduce myself. My name is Scott and Im 29 years old. I just recently picked up the game of golf about a year and half ago. I live in Mansfield, Texas and there are plenty of courses close to me. Because I work and have a wife and 2 kids, I do not get to play nearly as much as I would like too. In the year and half Iv been playing, I would guess I have played 15-20 times total. But just recently have decided to devote a little more time to my game and try to improve.

Now I will not claim to be any good, but I will claim to be very legit. I try and play as straight as possible. Even if I consistantly shoot triple digits, at least Im not cheating myself.

That being said, I need some work. Im pretty inconsistant to be honest. My best score ever was 94, but I seem to shoot 100-105 on average. That is until about 2 months ago. The last 3 times I have played I have been all over the place shooting 110-117. Not sure what is going on, but i have a NASTY hook. I hit my wedges (60* and 54* Callaway X wedges) and my PW, 9 irons (Nike Slingshots) great!! Inside 100 yards Im money with the best of them. But anything longer than my 9 iron and here comes the hook. Its getting VERY FRUSTRATING...

There is a PGA superstore not too far from me and I have a lesson scheduled for tomorrow. Then gonna go hit the course with a buddy of mine, so stay tuned!!


Now thats pretty much my background...... heres my question. Im thinking of getting some new irons. I currently am still using the first set that I bought a year and half ago. They are Nike Slingshot OSS with stiff graphite shafts. I was told they were great for begineers. But I think its a mental thing or something, but looking down on these HUGE club heads is distracting to me or something. I want something "thinner"... Iv been looking online and at stores and kinda narrowed it down to a few I like the look of, but havent actually swung a single club... Im open to any and all suggestions from keeping what I have to suggesting another club... Like I said, I just think its mental with me and these clubs...

here are few I like:
Callaway X22
Taylor Made CGB Max R7

I really like the look of the Callaway X Forged, Nike Forged, Mizuno blades, etc.... but I was told they would be bad for me until I get into 80s on consistant basis... Im not really trying to find a professional tour club to help me fade, etc.... I just want to hit it straight!!! LOL

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Posted
IMO, the problem isn't your clubs, it's probably your swing. So you're on the right track by getting a lesson (or lessons). That should help more than new clubs, unless your current clubs aren't fit properly. Now if you're buying new clubs just because you want to, then go for it. There are a bunch of great iron sets on the market. Try as many as you can, pick the ones you like best and get them fitted.

In myBagBoy Revolver: HiBore XL 10.5° ⢠HiBore 3W ⢠Halo 2i, 3i & 4i
MX900 5-PW ⢠MP-R 52-07° & 58-10° ⢠Studio Select Squareback 1

Carl Spackler: This is a hybrid. This is a cross of Kentucky Bluegrass, Featherbed Bent, and Northern California Sensemilia. The amazing stuff...


Posted
i have no doubt my problem is my swing. Im not blaming the clubs one bit. But like you said, I kinda just want something new. But most of all, I want something that is thinner when I look down. These things are so big, its hard to properly align my shot. Not that its a big deal now because of my hook. LOL, but when I do start hitting it straight, will be hard to aim straight with these...

what exactly does it mean to get fitted? What do they do to the clubs to make them "fitted" for me? When doing this, will they let you hit different clubs to see what you like? Im basically just going on what I think looks good as of right now.

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Posted
Just about any golf shop will include a free fitting when you buy new clubs. A basic fitting will involve taking some measurements and adjusting the length and lie of the clubs accordingly. A better fitting will also include measuring your swing speed to determine which shaft flex is best for you. I'm sure the PGA Superstore does all of this, so ask your instructor about it when you go to your lesson. I need to go to that PGA Superstore sometime - I've heard nothing but good things about it.
-----------------------
Here's a page that talks about club fitting: Club Fitting

In myBagBoy Revolver: HiBore XL 10.5° ⢠HiBore 3W ⢠Halo 2i, 3i & 4i
MX900 5-PW ⢠MP-R 52-07° & 58-10° ⢠Studio Select Squareback 1

Carl Spackler: This is a hybrid. This is a cross of Kentucky Bluegrass, Featherbed Bent, and Northern California Sensemilia. The amazing stuff...


Posted
did some custom fitting things online this morning from a few different websites and they all said the same thing according to my height, floor to wrist, etc etc....

regular flex
steel
normal lie


that being said, im sure custom done at PGA still better, but gives me an idea where im going.... right now I have graphite and stiff.

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Posted
I'm with you on the whole "I don't like looking down at a dinner plate" thing when it comes to irons.

Sounds like you're on the right lines with a lesson but get some drills to practice and go practice them. Golf is nothing if it isn't a game which rewards (sensible) practice.

As for blades not rewarding "beginners", I come from an era when (except for Ping Karsten and Eye) irons were _only_ blades. Personally, I think they're better in the long term but they do require the practice to groove your swing so you strike the ball consistently.

Mizuno make some very nice irons, I love my current MacGregors (1025M), Titleist make some good ones, can't fault many of Ping's and they range from some quite extreme offset irons to more of a blade style....lots to choose from!

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
played yesterday with a buddy and did MUCH better. Score wasnt great, but overall ball striking was probably one of my best ever games. I think I FINALLY figured a few things out... (shot 102, 3 pars, 42 putts though).

and I bought some new clubs today.... Adams A3, steel, stiff flex.... gonna go play again on Saturday.... I want 90s on consistent basis!!!

Driver: D2 - 10.5° - Fujikura Rombax 5X07
5 Wood: R9 - 19°
Irons: Taylor Made CB
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52°, 56°, 64°
Putter: Scotty Custom Studio Design  Balls: ProV1


Note: This thread is 6283 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.