Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6207 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi! New member here. Have just bought a new set of AP2's with Project X 5.5 shafts. Got fitted for them but am convinced that the shafts are just too soft for me.

Am 6ft 5 tall and play off 4. Driver SS is around 110mph and i hit my six iron around 175.

The new irons are stunning. Due to the fit the irons are 1.5" longer and 3 deg upright. Expected this because of my height but due to the sheer length am convinced that the shafts have been softened dramatically. To hit these straight at the mo I have to play a 3/4 type nudge shot. Whenever I give it close to 100% I get a massive high draw. Would the 6.0 or even 6.5 project x suit me much better? How much difference does the extra length make to the shaft? The shaft feels like a regular to me!!

Sorry for all the questions! Regards!

Posted
Well I am no clubfitter but since your shafts are 1.5 inches over standard then they are pretty soft flexes. When you hit the massive high draw that sounds like you are ballooning it. 6.0 and maybe 6.5 is probably right for you but there is no way of really knowing unless you can hit the different flexes. I'd suggest going back to the place where you bought them and say you think you got the wrong flex and get re fitted. That would be the only true way of knowing which flex is right.

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
Many thanks for the quick response. Yes I am ballooning them either straight or these massive humping great high draws!!! Am thinking that the 6.5 might be best and when the extra length etc is taken into this may may bring it closer to a 6.0.

  • Administrator
Posted
Hi! New member here. Have just bought a new set of AP2's with Project X 5.5 shafts. Got fitted for them but am convinced that the shafts are just too soft for me.

If you were fit, why don't you trust the 5.5s? You should have been able to see what was going on then. I doubt that the lengthening significantly changed the performance characeristics - and if it does, I'm sure True Temper and a reasonable clubfitter would know this and account for it. What's wrong with a high draw? Is it more of a hook?

That all being said, I play a 6.0 and have about the same numbers as you. While tempo and other things can matter, too, you should be pretty much right in the middle of the 6.0 range.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Based on the info which the pro had he thought the 5.5 would be best. I had a nagging doubt at the time and wish I'd gone to the 6. Basically I was kitted out based on the machine data in the shop. The reality hit home when out on the course. The draws are starting slightly left of target and going extremely high with a BIG draw. Wouldn't say that the shots are flat snap hooks though. I

Posted
Well if i remember right the 6.0 is for 180 6 iron carry, so if those soften just a tad, they seem perfect for you.
Edit: Also I always go with a stiffer shaft for irons, as it seems to have much better control for me, and pretty much no distance lost. Like iacas said, try your tempo too.

Posted
Well if i remember right the 6.0 is for 180 6 iron carry, so if those soften just a tad, they seem perfect for you.

many people with project x complain about them being boardy so my vote is to get some 6.0's and see how they work out.

in my x72 stand bag
g10 driver 10.5
g10 3-wood 15.5
g10 3 iron hybrid
cg gold with actionlite flighted vokey spin milled oil can 56 t35 60 degree anser 2 putterz urs


Posted
Thanks again. Sounds like the 6.0's could be the way to go!!!! Has anybody tried both the 5.5 and the 6.0 and is there a significant difference between them?

Posted
Well if i remember right the 6.0 is for 180 6 iron carry, so if those soften just a tad, they seem perfect for you.

That's interesting. On the course I'll hit the 6 iron 175-180 but generally closer to 175. According to the machine I was using I was actually hitting it 180-182 so am now a bit confused as to why I was told that the 5.5 was right for me.


Posted
I agree...adding that 1.5" would soften them up...unless they were freaked out at a 5.5 with the extra length. Most likley not.
I was hitting the 5.5 with them .5" over and had them flighted to that stiffness. no problem with them. You should talk to the guys that put them together for you.
My Sticks
Driver - Adams Tech A4 9.5* Matrix Xcon 7 X flex 266 Freq
3Wd - Exotics CB2 15* Motore F1 S flex tipped to 275 Freq
Hybrid - Taylormade Rescue TP 17* & 21*
Irons - 4 thru PW Mizuno MP 62 +1/2 X100 shaftsWedges - Vokey 52* and Scratch Golf WLD grind 58*Putter - Rife IBF Tour Assie custom fitGri...

Posted
That's interesting. On the course I'll hit the 6 iron 175-180 but generally closer to 175. According to the machine I was using I was actually hitting it 180-182 so am now a bit confused as to why I was told that the 5.5 was right for me.

http://www.royalprecision.com/precis..._projectx.html Check out the bottom, I was right 180 is the recommended 6 iron for the 6.0. I hit the 6.0 with the x forged and loved how they felt.

Posted
According to the manufacturer of the shafts, if your swing speed is in the overlapping area between shaft flexes (between, say 5.5 and 6.0), you should get the lower (5.5) if you want more distance, or go higher (6.0) if you want more accuracy. Seems like a no brainer. I'd sacrafice distance for accuracy any day.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5


Posted
I agree...adding that 1.5" would soften them up...unless they were freaked out at a 5.5 with the extra length. Most likley not.

Thanks for the advice. I'll check with them. Am 99.9% certain that the 5.5 shaft was just put in and not tweaked at all so what I've prob

ably ended up with is with softer a version! Frustrating!!

Posted
if your playing proj. x flighted 5.5's, then the extra length will not matter because all the shafts are tested for that frequency. Call up the place where you have been fitted, they probly made a mistake, the shafts are not going to be more flexible if they are longer, because project x goes by frequency, not common aliaus' like "regular, stiff, x, ect."

Posted
Have just bought a new set of X-22 Tours Project X 6.0 shafts.

Am 6ft 6 tall and play off 5. Driver SS is around 115mph and i hit my six iron around 180 so we are a pretty close match (hope you don't mind me doing a c+p of your words).

Due to the fit my irons are 1.0" longer and 3 deg upright.

I found the same thing when I tested with the 5.5's. 6.5's didn't feel right for me when I wanted to hit low punches etc and didn't feel as good in my 8-PW.

So I went with the 6.0's - Try the 6.0's I think the 5.5's with the lenght you have them at are probably not right (though within spec)... remember fitters can get it wrong sometimes as well!
Note: This thread is 6207 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.