Jump to content
IGNORED

What's the consensus on clones?

Alex1

By Alex1,
in Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting

 Share
Note: This thread is 5604 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

wardamneagle Member

wardamneagle

i dont have a problem with people playing clones. i do, however, have a problem with companies manufacturing clones.

In my x78 stand bag
Driver Tour Burner 9.5 REAX stiff
3 Wood 906F4 15.5 Aldila VS Proto stiff
Hybrid IDEA Pro Gold Matrix Ozik stiff
Irons AP1 4-W DG S300Wedges Vokey Spin Milled Oil Can 54, V-Foil Tour 60Putter Red X 35"Ball ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CrazyO_8 Member

CrazyO_8

i dont have a problem with people playing clones. i do, however, have a problem with companies manufacturing clones.

What's so wrong with that?

Driver- Nike Sasquatch 10.5/Aldila VS Proto ByYou
5 wood- Taylormade CGB Max Clone
3-PW- Nike Pro Combo Tour Clones
3 Hybrid (2i replacement)-Ben Hogan Edge CFT
Wedge- Vokey 56 degree Oil Can ClonePutter- Guerin Rife 2-Bar CloneBag- Cougar Hydro III Carry Bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

indacup Well Established Member

indacup

i dont have a problem with people playing clones. i do, however, have a problem with companies manufacturing clones.

My sentiments exactly.

I run across clones on a daily basis...and for the most part, the tolerances, materials are as good as the OEMs...and in some cases, I've seen better. AS also mentioned, fitted/shafted properly, theres no way a person can normally tell the difference. So, from a physical and economical stand point, I cannot fault people from buying and using clones. However, as a clone company, I don't think it's right to use another companies design for your own profit. Somewhere, a team of engineers designed a product...and now can be relegated competing against their own design.

Bag #1
DRIVER: TourSwing TVC 10.5*w/VooDoo
FW: Geek 15* w/Graman Limey
FW: TourSwing Thunder 19* w/Graman Limey
HYBRIDS: #4 #5 Alpha RX Low w/Graman LimeyIRONS: Nakashima NP-2 w/Accra i SeriesWEDGES: Same as abovePUTTER: Slighter Olympia #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Range King Well Established Member

Range King

.... and on top naming the clubs close to the original, to rub it in everybodies face, where the design (and maybe the casting mold) was stolen from.

In my Tour Combo Bag:

Driver: Superquad 9.5°
5W: 2008 Burner 18°
3H: Idea Pro Gold 20°4H: 2008 Burner Rescue 22°Irons: MP52 R300 5-PWedges: Vokey SM 50.08, 54.11, 58.04, 60.11Putter: Itsy Bitsy SpiderBall: TP Red

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Eagle Dedicated Member

Mr Eagle

Cloning is theft.Lets not beat about the bush here anyone using cloned clubs in encouraging an illeagle market,you are doing a great disservice to your fellow golfers in bringing into the market what are essentually Fakes.
These criminal companies should have no part of our golfing world,DONT BUY CLONES

In The Bag
Mizuno MX 560 Driver
Taylor made 3 wood
Mizuno HIFLI 21*
Mizuno MX 25's 4-pwMizuno MX series wedges 50, 56*/11 & 60*Bettinardi C02 putter4 bottles of pilsner,2 packs cigars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

st0wgolf08 Dedicated Member

st0wgolf08

I think they are of the same quality, yet don't like how they look or feel, knowing I'm using a fake, so I use all legit clubs. People here are talking about craftsmanship and materials, think back to when people were using hickory and still shooting great scores. If they can use a wood club how they did, and how well they did, then I'm sure the steel in a clone wouldn't hold me back versus the titanium in a brand new one. It's just a preference, someone on my golf team bought a clone sumo 5 wood, hit it amazing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 5604 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.

  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • DeadMan
      TST Explores the ShotScope H4 (Stats Tracking Device) and Pro LX Rangefinder

      By DeadMan ·

      Are you on the app or on the website? On the website, if you go to the performance tab, you can navigate with the side menu to see more detailed information. On those pages, you can switch between strokes gained and standard stats. You can see things like strokes gained from 50-100, 100-150, etc., strokes gained on lengths of putts. You can switch to standard information and see make rates on putt lengths. There's a good amount there to shape your practice. I don't use the app for this, so I can't help with that.
    • klineka
      Water in Bunker

      By klineka ·

      Temporary grandstands are in the general area though, a bunker is not so your relief options are different.  I don't really understand what is so difficult about this.  You should be more upset with whoever organizes/runs your league for not implementing GUR, not the rule itself. Especially since this is a league and if it's at the same course every time it's likely that this isn't the first time the bunker has filled up completely with water.
    • klineka
      TST Explores the ShotScope H4 (Stats Tracking Device) and Pro LX Rangefinder

      By klineka ·

      Not sure if this is best to post here or start a new thread but I'm curious which stats you pay most attention to/how you utilize Shot Scope's data/charts to drive your improvement/practice?   I have 81 holes in Shot Scope now so starting to get a decent sample size of data about my game. I can obviously see the strokes gained numbers but I'm not quite sure where to go from there in terms of how to assess what specifically I need to work on.  Obviously it's approaches and short game for me, but when I go into those tabs on the left for those specific areas, I'm not quite sure how to use the information to make it actionable in my practice.   
    • anaveragehacker
      Water in Bunker

      By anaveragehacker ·

      I guess we’re kind of getting into semantics here, but you state “trading a bunker lie for a grass lie”. I would argue that a bunker under water is no longer a bunker. It is basically a small pond where there isn’t supposed to be one. The course has an unplayable condition due to weather and poor maintenance. Hitting a ball out of three inches of water is not a realistic option any more than hitting through a temporary grandstand is. Just my opinion.
    • billchao
      Water in Bunker

      By billchao ·

      So here’s the thing, you’ve treated the bunker as if it were GUR, which would actually be the appropriate course of action except you and your playing partners are not authorized to determine that for yourselves. The Committee in this case would be the golf course and in an ideal world, they would have handled their responsibilities and told you at the beginning of the round that X bunkers are under water, treat them as GUR. I’m actually ok with how you handled the situation in a casual round TBH but this is the rules forum and you asked about a rules clarification so there’s a specific procedure for that. As for your proposed rule, I don’t agree with the logic at all for the reason I outlined in my previous post. You are trading a bunker lie for a lie in grass for no penalty. And also, there are already rules in place that address the exact situation you found yourself in, including relief options for if the bunker was appropriately marked as GUR or not.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept
The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...