Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6162 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I get to choose between the Mizuno MX-19s with STEEL shafts, or the Callaway Big Berth '08s with GRAPHITE shafts.

Both sets are new, but I am a beginner so I was told to go with the much more forgiving Mizunos.

Any thoughts? Thanks!

Posted
i use to have the MX-19s before changing to my current set recently. They are a bit chunky but are very easy to hit. Clubs 5 4 have a ridiculous amount of offset and are extremely chunky.

If you are patient and are gonna put in a lot of practice id recommend something different. In my opinion after awhile u will want to get a new set. But if you were just intending to have a hit once in awhile then the mx19s are perfect.

Driver: Nike Sumo 5000 9.5
5W: Mizuno F-60
3H: Mizuno CLK Fli-Hi
Irons: Nike CCI Forged 4-PW
SW: Mizuno MX-19 LW: Mizuno MP-R 60Deg


Posted
i use to have the MX-19s before changing to my current set recently. They are a bit chunky but are very easy to hit. Clubs 5 4 have a ridiculous amount of offset and are extremely chunky.

I am starting to get more and more into golfing so I am planning on using my clubs a lot over the next few years. The other choice is the Callaway's but they are graphite shafts and I was told those arent very suitable for beginners.

Thanks for your advice GolfingNewbie.

Posted
Mx19s.

I would also steer clear of the graphite shafts purely because if you arent used to taking care of a set of clubs... you can really nick up the shafts in a hurry from the bag chatter.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Posted
The other choice is the Callaway's but they are graphite shafts and I was told those arent very suitable for beginners.

I'd say either set would work well. But I don't agree that graphite isn't good for beginners. JMHO they are perfect for beginners. They will generally launch the ball higher and with their lighter weight, might generate a little more clubhead speed. I think graphite is great for beginners. You will change clubs many times as your swing improves. I wouldn't be looking for a set of irons that will last forever. My vote is for the Callaways, for now, you can know that they will hold their value quite well.

I'm not sure what you mean when you say you "get to choose". Ultimately the decision will be made for you if you get a chance to hit both sets. Just go with the one that performs better for you. Be real honest about how each performs and pay careful attention to your ball flight with each. Good luck & I'm sure you will make the right decision.

Posted
I'd say either set would work well. But I don't agree that graphite isn't good for beginners. JMHO they are perfect for beginners. They will generally launch the ball higher and with their lighter weight, might generate a little more clubhead speed. I think graphite is great for beginners. You will change clubs many times as your swing improves. I wouldn't be looking for a set of irons that will last forever. My vote is for the Callaways, for now, you can know that they will hold their value quite well.

Ya thanks for the input Stacey_E, I just now went out and tested both steel and graphite to see what the "deal" was, and I really couldnt tell the difference between the two. At least not enough to sway me either direction.

And what I mean by "I get to choose" is that my Dad has two sets of irons, and I get to chose one of them. So price isnt an issue when comparing the Mizunos and the Callaways. What about stiff and regular flex? I heard with steel I should have regular and with graphite I should have stiff? ... as a beginner.

Posted
If you cant tell any difference then it doesnt matter which you get. Hit them both until you can tell a difference or, if that doesnt happen, flip a coin.

Posted
Does anyone advise me not to use graphite as a beginner? Stiff flex with graphite?

In this month's Golf Digest (Hot List issue) there is a little side story with a graph that indicates that for a better player a steel shaft is better, but for a higher handicap player a graphite shaft may be better. I used graphite shafts several years ago when I was just getting back into game after long absence and had no problems with them. They are easier to swing and can be swung easier and still get same distance, which helps with mechanics.

Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Note: This thread is 6162 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.