Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6155 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, I bought new clubs, twice. I never new that there was a "swing weight" I could know before buying....duh! I went from Callaway BB to Fusion, hated them, I went from the Fusion to TM XD, don't care much for them. With 20 swings the head came unglued. I took the TM to the pro shop and told the guy what I was feeling. They had a lefty 455 Macgregor. I LOVE the weight!

He checked the TM, D-0 swing weight, check the Fusion, same. The clubs I feel good hitting are d-1 or heavier, Why?

I hit my Taylor made XD in the simulator, good hit were 155-160 with the 7 iron. He added lead tape to the same club. Good swings were 152-158 but I was MUCH more consistent. I hit it true much more often with the d-2 weighting. Why?

So do I muck up the TM's with lead tape, or "re ebay" them and get 455 macs, BB's, Sz-9, or some other D-2?

Any recommendations??


Posted
Swing weights can be adjusted simply by adding lead tape to the head, or by a clubmaker with a powder or weightplugs down the shaft at assembly.

Keep in mind that 2 different clubs can have the same swingweight but a totally different static weight. If you have a steel shafted iron with a D1 swingweight, it will be much heavier overall, but may feel similar to swing than a graphite shafted iron with the same swingweight. Because graphite shafts are much lighter, more of the weight of the club is in the head, leading to a heavier swingweight.

Try adding or removing weight using lead tape. I have always advocated swinging the heaviest club you can manage. My irons are D4 to D8, and my wedges are E0. They all have steel shafts. My woods have graphite and have swingweights of D6.

Basic physics really, the more mass on the club, the greater the energy transfer to the ball when you hit it and the further it will go. There is a point of diminishing returns of course, if your swing speed starts to drop, the club is probably too heavy. Give it a try!

In my Srixon staff bag:

Driver: Titleist 909D2 8.5 - Grafalloy Epic X
Fairway: Adams RPM LP 13 degree - Grafalloy Epic X
Hybrids: Adams Idea Pro 18 degree - DGSL X100Irons: MacGregor 1025M 3-PW - DG X100SW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54 - DG X100LW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 58 - DG X100Putter...


Posted

I think getting the correct swingweight is very crucial! It's just something you find based on trial and error. One method is to take an iron (6 or 7) and place impact tape on the face. Hit some balls gradually adding lead tape until the spread of the hits decrease. At some point, when you get too much SW in the club, the contact spots will spread back out and/or you will start regripping the club a the top of the back swing.

I personally need at least D1 but D2-D4ish is my preference with irons and woods. Many will say you can't tell a difference in one swingweight, but I'm not completely sure that is true. As the previous poster alluded, you can have a light club with a heavy swingweight, a heavy club with a light swing weight, and everything in between. A too light swing weight (regardless of overall weight) causes me to jerk down from the top, loose the clubhead in my swing, jerk the club away at address and overall destroy my tempo and timing. But a too high of a swingweight actually does the same for me.

One thing I've found is the lower the shaft weight the more swingweight I need. I can handle even D1 in Nippon 90 gram steel shaft, but in a graphite shaft I need at least D2 and a minimum of 60-65 grams. I once had a Cleveland Launcher with 55 gram NV and C9 swingweight. Hook machine! I could kill every golpher down the left side of the fairway and rough out to about 200 yards.


Posted
A too light swing weight (regardless of overall weight) causes me to jerk down from the top, loose the clubhead in my swing, jerk the club away at address and overall destroy my tempo and timing. But a too high of a swingweight actually does the same for me.

To your point - Moe Norman, far and away the greatest ball striker of all time, used very heavy clubs. His theory was that a heavy club couldn't get offline as easily as a light one, and a heavy hammer hits the nail harder! I have also noticed that a heavy club is always more forgiving than a lighter one.

Again, because of the laws of physics: energy = mass x velocity. So, the faster you can swing the heaviest club possible, the further you will hit it. The trick is finding a club that is as heavy as possible while being able to maintain your max effective swing speed.

In my Srixon staff bag:

Driver: Titleist 909D2 8.5 - Grafalloy Epic X
Fairway: Adams RPM LP 13 degree - Grafalloy Epic X
Hybrids: Adams Idea Pro 18 degree - DGSL X100Irons: MacGregor 1025M 3-PW - DG X100SW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54 - DG X100LW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 58 - DG X100Putter...


Posted
Momentum is mass x velocity. Energy is 1/2 mass x velocity squared + changes in potential energy. So it is true a more massive club swung at the same speed as a less massive club (all other factors being equal) will hit the ball further... but one reaches a point where too much mass cannot be swung at a speed that leads to greater distance. Going the other way, at some point too light a mass cannot be swung at a significantly greater speed to offset the loss of mass and one loses distance. Modern clubs, shafts, shaft lengths, etc., have all been pretty well optimized for the range of golf swings for which they are intended. There is no secret break-through waiting to happen with mass. Despite all the work on moment of inertia, all it does is produce more uniform distance on off-center hits, not more distance on flush hits. Just a little physics update... Remember total energy and momentum are conserved in a golf swing but kinetic energy is not conserved.

RC

 


Posted

Thanks,
I guess we can tell why I failed physics in college!

In my Srixon staff bag:

Driver: Titleist 909D2 8.5 - Grafalloy Epic X
Fairway: Adams RPM LP 13 degree - Grafalloy Epic X
Hybrids: Adams Idea Pro 18 degree - DGSL X100Irons: MacGregor 1025M 3-PW - DG X100SW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54 - DG X100LW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 58 - DG X100Putter...


Posted
From a physics point of view for a "simple collision" between a clubhead and golf ball, the relevant equation is

VB = VC*(1+COR)/(1+MB/MC)

where VB is the ball velocity after impact, COR is the coefficient of restitution, MB is the mass of the ball, MC is the mass of the clubhead, and VC is the clubhead velocity at impact.

For the case of a typical driver (MC = 200 grams) and a 100 mph clubhead speed, raising the swingweight 9 points (adding weight to the clubhead) yields 2 additional mph ball speed (assuming no change in VC). There isn't much to be gained in adding weight to the club (from a collision perspective). The leverage is even less for heavier clubheads (like basically every other clubhead in your bag).

dave

In The Bag:
- Wishon 949MC 10.5* Driver
- Wishon 525 F/D 3W
- Wishon 515 949MC 5W
- Wishon 60* Cx Micro LW- Wishon 550M SW (55*)- Wishon 550M GW bent to 50* - Wishon 550C 6i - 9i (9i bent to 45*)- Wishon 321Li 3i/4i/5i hybrids- Odyssey Two Ball Putter


Posted
Kinda makes sense. When I played softball I preferred heavier bats than everyone else. I like a really end loaded bat. Whenever I used light bats I didn't feel like I had enough control. Also felt like maybe I got handsy with the light bat, maybe my hips have time to clear with the heavier club.

Posted

The cheapest way to increase your swing weight is to add "length" to the club (1/2 an inch will add about 3 whole swing weights... i.e. D0 becomes D3). Shaft extenders, and new grips are much cheaper than buying a new set of shafts or clubs. Lead tape is cheap, but it "boogers" up your clubs.

The only down side to making your clubs longer is, the extra length also makes your shaft flex a little "softer" (i.e. more whip).

There is almost an infinite number of possible combinations, but the "hunt" can be half the fun...

Good Luck!


Note: This thread is 6155 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.