Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

221 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1628
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      819


Recommended Posts

Jack was a better ball-striker. Tiger is much better around the greens. They are equally great putters. Jack played against more formidable competition. Jack was the better all-around athlete but Tiger at his best is better than Jack was at his best

Author of "Striking It Rich: Golf in the Kingdom with Generals, Patients and Pros"
www.reidsheftall.com


Tiger:

The adversity, competition, course design and technology is no where near the days of Jack. Not taking anything away from a true legend as Jack.
HiBore XL Tour 10.5* Fujikura Speeder 652 Tour Spec X-Flex
HiBore 15* FW Aldila 70-S "Proto By You"
Hibore 2i Aldila 80-S "Proto By you"
MP-67 3-pw *Project X 6.0
MP-R Black Nickel wedges 52*-7 56*-10 60*-5 *Project X 6.0 GM2 Exchange #6 Staff Bag

I'm going with Tiger due to his physical conditioning. Sports (not just golf) is in a new era where athletes are spending a considerable amount of time in gyms (I occasionally visit the John Kruk/Daly camp though). I don't think Tiger wins Southern Hills in that heat w/o the conditioning. I think this will give him a bit more longevity than Jack.

Wuzzinmebag:

Driver: Burner Draw 10.5°, Reg Flex
Hybrid: Rescue Dual 19°, Reg Flex
Hybrid: Rescue Dual 22°, Reg Flex4-GW: S9, Nippon 900 XH Steel ShaftSW: 588 DSG, 56°; 14° bouncePutter: White Hot XG #3 33"igolf GPS caddie(Somewhat) lowering that handicap one round at a time...


Well new to golf and being only 29 I'm going to have to go with Tiger.. Ask my grandfather though and I'm sure he would say the golden-bear.
Inside the OGIO Exodus
Driver: Ping G10 10.5* w/ TFC129 Stiff 45"
Hybrid: Nike SQ Sumo2 #4 & Sumo #2 w/ DG S300
Irons: Callaway X-20 5-PW w/ DG S300 2* Up
Wedges: Nike SV Tour Black 52.10 - 56.10 - 60.6 w/ DG S400Putter: Tour Bettinardi 32.5" Loft 3* Lie 70*Ball: Precept U-Tri Tour / Bridgestone...

i agree.

the science is a lot better now, but Tiger brings a whole new 'sports' mentality and training to golf.

Unfortunately, I am only 28 and did not witness Jack in his prime, so I cannot totally speak from experience. I would say Tiger "will be the greatest", although I would argue that he may already be the greatest just because of what he can do. The man is just uncanny with what he can do with a golf ball and the creativity that he brings to the course. I am sure Jack in his prime could do some amazing things, but I don't think there is anyone who can play the variety of shots that Tiger has in his bag. I also think the mental game that he has is probably 90% of the reason he wins, the man is so committed and mentally focused that it is scary.

I also don't agree with some of the comments made in this thread. One is that Jack played against a tougher field. I find that hard to believe considering the talent that most of these guys have today. Also someone said Jack was a better all around athlete...no way. First have you seen how fit Tiger is nowadays and he has shown that he is a pretty coordinated individual.

----------------------------
In the Grom:

Driver: Sasquatch 9.5 Mitsubishi Diamana XS
3 Wood: Bubble Burner (needs to be replaced immediately)7 Wood: Steelhead IIIIrons: CG1 Black Pearls 2-PWWedges: 650 - 56 degree; 60 degree Putter: White Hot XG9 33"Ball: ProV1


jack tell tiger beats hes majors records

In my bag
Driver FT-5 10*
3-wood: tour burner
5-wood: sasquatch
Irons: x-18 pro seires 4-PWWedges: X Tour 52* 56* 60*putter: Sabertoothball: TP blackFirst ace: 20/09/2007


I voted for Tiger, but that was without the benefit of ever having seen Jack play (besides highlight replays).

to some extent this is a push. it's not that jack's competition was tougher per say, but there were more players who could close the deal. tiger doesn't really have that with the fields today, no disrespect to phil and vijay or other top players. tiger is the best putter for par from 15 feet in, no questions asked that is his big thing right now. mentally they both just wont accept losing so that's a push. when it's said and done i believe it will be tiger, but not by much.

If I have to choose today, I take Jack. I personally don't put alot of weight into the equipment, course design/layout/, depth of competition aspects of the argument and opt for the intangible aspects of the game (like heart, discipline, pressure play, sheer will). I view the former elements as a wash. These men play(ed) the best competition using the best equipment available on the most challenging courses of the time. Heck, Jack and Tiger are so good at hitting a golf ball they could probably beat me using my wifes' Eureka Upright.

To me, it comes down to mano-e-mano on Sunday. The epic clash of the titans. If it's just these two, I say Jack wins his fair share and maybe more. Tiger, while an awesome frontrunner and astounding talent, hasn't shown he can close the deal from behind (usually too far ahead). Maybe this comes later in the career, but for now it's The Golden Bear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I agree in general. The one way in which the viewer will notice the pace of play is just that "it's been an hour and Nelly Korda or Scottie Scheffler have only played four holes." Or if for some reason they show a lot of shots of players just standing around when they could be showing golf shots. But I think Andy Johnson said it most recently/best, playing fast is a skill, too. I would love for pro golfers to play faster. You'd see the players you want to see hit more shots in the same time than they do now. So I don't disagree with the pace of play stuff, and hope they can find ways to do it. Heck, the LPGA should leap at the chance to differentiate itself in this way, IMO. So: I stand by what I said in that the TV viewer really doesn't notice much about pace of play. It's rare when they do. I support increasing the pace of play wholeheartedly. But my top five reasons don't include TV ratings or viewership.
    • I don't think the viewer at home can pick up on pace of play, unless the announcers mention something. The telecast has the luxury of bouncing from player to player, which ensures we the viewer always have something to watch.  I think we would notice pace of play if the camera just followed one golfer for an entire round. Or  You were actually golfing behind the slow group Or  The slow group is the last to only group left to finish the tournament.  I like the idea of having a person carrying a digital clock, following each golfer. When the golfer gets to the ball and the group in front of them has cleared they have 60 seconds or they get a penalty stroke. Maybe a second violation is a 2 stroke penalty.  Or as I have said before, every golfer wears a shock collar!!!!! at 1 min 1 second that golfer if going to drop. It will take them a good 30 second to recover, leaving them with another 30 seconds to hit the shot. The course would be littered with golfers just convulsing on fair way from an endless cycle of shocks because they cant seem to hit their ball and keep pace of play. 
    • This isn't the same thing.  This is entirely a time of year thing. Not a trend.  This is the COVID year.  There are many who think the Masters viewership was actually way up. The 2024 ratings being down is only for CBS televisions. It doesn't include anyone (including me) who watched it online. 
    • Ha, I didn't even notice that "NFL competition" part… I just dismissed it on face because pause has very little if any role in TV ratings.
    • Wait a second. That is a bit misleading to drag a 4 year old headline about the ratings when the Masters was delayed during the pandemic. The 2024 ratings were down but not to the extent that this headline would imply. Also, @iacas is correct. Any ratings drop has very little, or perhaps, nothing to do with pace of play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...