Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1627
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

Posted
In some ways it's apples and oranges...the courses are longer, but the equipment is better. There is a science to golf now, that wasn't around when Jack was playing. Slow mo cameras, digital swing analysis, shaft differentials etc., etc.

Posted
Those that were fortunate enough to see Jack hit a driver in his prime will likely agree that if he had today's equipment and ball, be would be as long or longer than any on tour today. Talking to golfers who should know, I know for a fact that Tiger was told Jack would have been longer -- at a time when Tiger was considered the best power player on tour. Of course, today, probably by choice, Tiger is not even in the top ten in length.

Jack was big, amazingly strong, fast as lightening, and simply exploded on the ball. He looked like an Ohio State middle linebacker, but swung with the grace of a ballet dancer. At the time, no one had ever seen anything like his power. He changed the game by hitting it higher and further and forced golfers to be much more athletic in order to compete. Jump forward, and the Tiger era is similar -- Tiger also changed the game to yet a new level of athleticism.

So it is an apples and oranges type discussion. However, when Tiger retires, I think there will be no argument that he was the greatest golfer in history. But it is unlikely that there will not be someone better come along in the future. Improvement is as natural as time itself.

RC

 


Posted
i think Tiger had more exposure, that's why we think he's better. There are a lot more people watching golf today than there was back in the day when nicklaus was king.

It was super rare to see kids play golf those times, but ti's pretty common now.

Posted
Tech doesn't matter it is relative. One thing we have to keep in mind too is the real dominance Tiger has (Just like Jack did). It is harder these days on tour to have so much dominance because there are more people practicing harder, more tours, etc. Tigers level of dominance is amazing.

Jack: Better driver of the ball.
Tiger: Better short game.

They both are excellent putters

theincrediblegolfbum.blogspot.com Aol messenger: "Drifterland88"

Driver Tour Burner 9.5 s (Best Driver Ever!)
3-Wood Burner 07 14.5 s
3-Hybrid Halo 22degree Irons X-Forged Project 6.o Rifle s-flexGW SV 52.08 SW Tour Action 900 56.12 LW Oil Can 60.06


Posted
Those that were fortunate enough to see Jack hit a driver in his prime will likely agree that if he had today's equipment and ball, be would be as long or longer than any on tour today. Talking to golfers who should know, I know for a fact that Tiger was told Jack would have been longer -- at a time when Tiger was considered the best power player on tour. Of course, today, probably by choice, Tiger is not even in the top ten in length.

Jack was very long (In his prime reaching clubhead speeds of

up to 120) amazing for persimmon woods! But lets look at the facts here. Tiger when he came on tour swung around 134 off the tee Average with a driver that was not much longer.

theincrediblegolfbum.blogspot.com Aol messenger: "Drifterland88"

Driver Tour Burner 9.5 s (Best Driver Ever!)
3-Wood Burner 07 14.5 s
3-Hybrid Halo 22degree Irons X-Forged Project 6.o Rifle s-flexGW SV 52.08 SW Tour Action 900 56.12 LW Oil Can 60.06


Posted
I'm just getting into golf and never seen anything jack did. Tiger is just so good today and hard to think anyone was ever better.

FT-i 10 Regular
3W
5W
X18R Irons
Anser PutterHaven't decided on a ball yet


Posted
tiger is definately a better golfer because, he can hit it farther, but he can everything better than jack exept putting

big bertha driver
3,5 wood
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Iron
SQ Sumo2 Hybrid
sand and pitching wedgeputterpro V1 balls burner ballsCallaway Tour Authentic Diablo Staff Bag


Posted
Tiger dominates the game much more then Jack ever did. In a few years Tiger will hold all the records.

Posted
Tiger dominates the game much more then Jack ever did. In a few years Tiger will hold all the records.

Only someone with absolutely no awareness of the history of golf could say such a thing.

Jack dominted the game from the early 60s to the mid-80s. Dominated. As in: everything was about - what is Jack doing? In the same way as the last 10 years or so have been about whatever Tiger is doing. Tiger has dominated in the way Jack did since 1997. Jack dominated for 25 years. Another 12 years or so and you can say Tiger has dominated AS MUCH AS Jack; but so far - still a few years to go.

Posted
I'm just getting into golf and never seen anything jack did. Tiger is just so good today and hard to think anyone was ever better.

You're just getting into golf, as you say. Read up on some history and find out about Jack v Arnie; Jack v Lee Trevino; Jack v Tom Watson; then Watson and Ballesteros v Jack, in the latter's twilight years.

And when you have some time, read about Ben Hogan, Sam Snead, Bobby Jones, et al. All dominant in their eras.

  • Administrator
Posted
Jack dominted the game from the early 60s to the mid-80s. Dominated. As in: everything was about - what is Jack doing?

Dude, you weren't even born until Jack had won half of his majors...

Tiger has dominated in the way Jack did since 1997.

That's probably not fair to Tiger. His pace is well, well, well ahead of Jack's. He's won PGA Tour events at something nearing double the pace and he's won majors several years ahead of Jack's pace.

Tiger has dominated MORE so than Jack ever did. And Jack never won majors by 15 or 12 shots.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah but Tiger is burned out. Got the yips now and not having any fun on the course. Look for Tiger to give up on Jack's record and retire from the game. Will enter politics and become the next governor of Florida. Then run for the presidency when Obama's time is up.

 Sub 70 849 9* driver

:callaway:  Rogue 3 & 5 woods, Rogue X 4 & 5 hybrids

:tmade: SIM 2 6-gap irons

:cobra:  King snakebite grove wedges 52 & 58*

 :ping: Heppler ZB3 putter

 

 


Posted
Dude, you weren't even born until Jack had won half of his majors...

And I think Bobby Jones was nearly dead, too. But I can read, and I do! And I can watch re-runs and videos...

...though I don't spend all my time doing that! I have a life as well... Just strikes me as strange that people say 'I never saw Jack so Tiger's obviously better'.
Tiger has dominated MORE so than Jack ever did. And Jack never won majors by 15 or 12 shots.

No, Jack didn't win by huge margins - he did enough to win. (Juan Manuel Fangio used to do the same in Formula One. Many think he was the greatest ever, despite Schumacher's achievements. He set the benchmark Schumacher strove to pass - same as Jack set the benchmark for Tiger.)

One point, though - the "Duel in the Sun". Jack lost by a shot - but he was 10 shots ahead of Hubert Green, in third. He missed out but he and Watson were, truly, a class apart. He won the Masters by 9 in 1965 and the PGA by 7 in 1980. Although he was associated with last-round charges to get into a playoff, I can only recall 4 off the top of my head - he won 3 (lost the other one I can remember to Lee Trevino). I like this, from sports columnist Thomas Boswell: "Some things cannot possibly happen, because they are both too improbable and too imperfect. The US hockey team cannot beat the Russians in the 1980 Olympics. Jack Nicklaus cannot shoot 65 to win the Masters at age 46. Nothing else comes immediately to mind."

  • Administrator
Posted
Just strikes me as strange that people say 'I never saw Jack so Tiger's obviously better'.

Me too, but I don't claim to have seen Jack in his prime or attest to how people were behaving. Jack was overshadowed by Arnold Palmer the first six years of his career from what I can tell, even though Arnie practically stopped winning as soon as he arrived.

So you playing it off as though you remember how it was when Jack was playing, despite the fact that you probably weren't cognizant of golf or Jack Nicklaus until he'd won 16 or 17 of his majors, is almost as strange.
"Some things cannot possibly happen, because they are both too improbable and too imperfect. The US hockey team cannot beat the Russians in the 1980 Olympics. Jack Nicklaus cannot shoot 65 to win the Masters at age 46. Nothing else comes immediately to mind."

None of which has anything to do with the fact that Tiger's pace is well, well ahead of Jack's.

Personally I call it a dead heat right now. Tiger's won them faster. Jack won more. Until Tiger passes Jack, I'll keep considering it a dead heat. But that's me - you think what you like. Won't bother me one bit.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Me too, but I don't claim to have seen Jack in his prime or attest to how people were behaving. Jack was overshadowed by Arnold Palmer the first six years of his career from what I can tell, even though Arnie practically stopped winning as soon as he arrived.

My father was a very keen golfer and used the example of Nicklaus to drum good behaviour into me. I watched golf from a very early age - from before I can really remember, in fact! But I do remember 1986 (The Masters), very, very clearly, and 1980 pretty well.

(I've also tried to use equipment from the 1960s and 70s - I find the irons, especially, very, very difficult to hit consistently and the woods go nothing like as far. Hats off to anyone who could make them work! )
None of which has anything to do with the fact that Tiger's pace is well, well ahead of Jack's.

Tiger's 33 and has won 14. By the same age, Jack had won 12. Yes, Tiger's ahead, but not by much.

My opinion may be coloured by what I have been told but I'm with those who believe that the relative competition today (at the top end) is not as high as it was in the Nicklaus/Palmer/Trevino (etc) era. But it's so easy to find information, DVDs, on-line films, etc from earlier times - I've got a short video of Bobby Jones' swinging, for example. Just puzzles me that others don't seem to bother. In all of that, I've never seen nor come across any reports of spitting, swearing, club-smashing, etc by Jack. Jones, yes. Same with Faldo, when younger. Must be honest - I don't like that aspect of Tiger and, again, it has an influence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.