Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6104 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
this is my question; how hard are you supposed to try and hit the ball in a full swing ?

in ben hogans 5 lessons, he says you should try and hit the ball as hard as you can, whereas others have told me that i am trying to hit the ball too hard, when i was probaly hitting it 95% max.


thoughts ?

Posted
This is where every learner golfer goes wrong. They all want to hit the ball 300 yards+ and they all think the way to do it is to hit the ball harder or as hard as you can. You don't need to hit the ball hard at all! By swinging harder it is a lot harder to keep your balance and if you don't keep your balance you will be hitting the ball all over the place...

If you swing really smooth and gentle it will go further... Distance is all about technique and not how hard you it the ball.

I am big headed and i love it. Try it yourself and see how much your game improves.

"The difference between impossible and the possible lies in a persons determination" - Tommy Lasorda
"It is never too late to be what you might have been" - George Eliot
In my bag:Ball: I always use Pro V1Driver: ...


Posted
You don't need to hit the ball hard at all! By swinging harder it is a lot harder to keep your balance and if you don't keep your balance you will be hitting the ball all over the place...

Agree 100%. The key is to find a good repeatable swing and then you can adjust it from there. Just swinging hard won't do much since you won't be able to control it. The better the swing, the easier it is to control so you can sometimes get a little extra if you need to. I tend to have a hard swing, but there is a fine line that I try not to cross. If I go a little to hard or take the backswing to far, things go bad.

Try and find some video of Ernie Els (The Big Easy). He has the same swing speed and tempo on every shot. Yet he can hit it as far as anyone, and can control it as well as anyone.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
I agree and disagree with the not swinging hard. For me, my biggest misses are when I try to not go after it. I believe hitting the half shots well is one of the hardest things for me. I know my best days are when I feel confident and really try to hit the ball hard all day. If I try to just hit the fairway on a short hole I will end up 50 yards right in the trees. It really throws off my timing. But when I need to hit a good one hard, I seem to pull it off easier.

Another point. It is impossible to be in pressured situations and not swing hard. The addrenline (can't spell) will not allow you to swing easy. So if you want to play competitively you have to be able to go after it. Look at most pros with the driver. Most swing hard with balance. The big easy still goes after it but he makes it look so smooth. Same with Paul Casey.

Brian


Posted
I agree and disagree with the not swinging hard. For me, my biggest misses are when I try to not go after it. I believe hitting the half shots well is one of the hardest things for me. I know my best days are when I feel confident and really try to hit the ball hard all day. If I try to just hit the fairway on a short hole I will end up 50 yards right in the trees. It really throws off my timing. But when I need to hit a good one hard, I seem to pull it off easier.

I have to agree. In todays game you have to go after it a bit. I would say if you are just starting off, swinging 80% and getting a feel for making good contact is important, maybe even slower at times. However, once you have gained the ability to make contact consistently it is important to find a speed that works for you. I think some people do better going after it and some do better swinging slower. The whole swing slow hit it farther just isnt true, i guess i would say "swing SMOOTH hit it farther." If you are able to make the same contact swinging hard as you do when you swing slow the ball will go farther, the key is to practice swinging fast. If you do this you will learn the timing necessary and be able to make the same contact. If you practice swinging slow and then try to crank it up on the course you will definetly suffer mis-hits and less distance. I to tend to hit it off line when i swing slow and try to aim it. I guess in the end try it all and see what works!


Posted
Hard enough. Thats the only way I can think of to describe it. I know how far I hit each club and don't try to hit it further. I also don't think too much about hitting it 80% or whatever.

To me, its just swing at the speed that gets me the best combination of distance and accuracy, and that speed differs depending on how well I'm playing. That speed will normally sort itself out without me having to think about it.

In my bag:
Driver: G10 10.5 TFC 129 Shaft
3 wood: R7 Steel
Hybrid: 585H 21 Degree
Irons 3-PW: 735.CMWedges: Vokey 52.08, 56.14Putter: White Hot XG #5


Posted
A big reason why people are hitting slices, hooks & wild shots is due to trying to hit the ball too hard... They don't complete the swing correctly because they lose their balance or they use their arms to force the ball in the wrong direction. You still need to have your Rhythm wether you hit it the ball hard or soft to strike it well. But the easier swing to control is certainly a more gentle swing.

I've tried swinging the ball at crazy speeds and striking it 100% out of the middle and it doesn't make a difference to my distance. And when i say crazy speeds i mean crazy speeds, when i missed the timing i really pulled a lot of muscles.

I am big headed and i love it. Try it yourself and see how much your game improves.

"The difference between impossible and the possible lies in a persons determination" - Tommy Lasorda
"It is never too late to be what you might have been" - George Eliot
In my bag:Ball: I always use Pro V1Driver: ...


Posted
As hard as you can hit it with a controlled, comfortable and repeatable swing. For me, it's about 95%. I find, honestly, that 80% effort will yeild 95% of your distance.
What's In My Stand Bag...
Driver: R9 TP 9.5*
3W: R9 15*
Hybrid: Rescue Dual TP 2H 16*
Irons 3-P: MP-62Wedges: Vokey 52* & 58*Putter: 34" Newport StudioBall: Pro V1x

Posted
I find i hit the most perfect shot when i apply the least amount of effort into my swing. No thoughts... nothing... Im not strangling my big dog and i am swinging like i don't want to hurt him.

With this technique i have driven to the front fringe of a 443 yard par 4 off the back white tee's in a club final with about 50 people watching. The conditions were not good either... Not much wind & slightly damp. My ball shots are 99.5% flight and i would love to add some topspin to make them roll but i really don't want to play with my swing.

I am big headed and i love it. Try it yourself and see how much your game improves.

"The difference between impossible and the possible lies in a persons determination" - Tommy Lasorda
"It is never too late to be what you might have been" - George Eliot
In my bag:Ball: I always use Pro V1Driver: ...


Posted
As long as you stay in-tempo and on balance, you can swing as hard as you want. The problem with swinging as hard as you can is that you often get out of tempo or you go off-plane and you never know where the ball is going to end up.
The key to hitting the ball isnt in how hard you swing, its in how good your technique is and in how solid your contact with the ball is.
Swinging slower and hitting the ball in the center of the clubface is better than swinging as hard as you can and hitting the ball all over the clubface, IMHO.
Typically I only swing at about 75%. I actually have to force myself to slow my swing down, which for me results in more solid contact and shots that actually go farther and end up where I aim them.
Not to say that I know more than Ben Hogan (I most definetly do not), but what worked for him may not work for everyone.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Note: This thread is 6104 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.