Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6095 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi,

Two years ago I bought my Nike Sumo2 squared driver. I was pretty young and new at golfing back then, so I wanted a driver that went straight, and it did....

Now I am in for more power and distance, as I feel the ballflight with the Sumo driver is too slow and it doesn`t feel as much as a drive as it could be.

I`ve been interested in a Taylor Made Superquad for a long time, as I think it looks powerful, sleek and funny to hit.
Also, I think the FT-iQ is sexy, and appearance has a lot to say when it comes to clubs (don`t know why, though).

The raw details when it comes to my new driver is as following:
*I want power and distance
*I know how to hit the ball clean, so it doesn`t need to have forgiveness as top priority

Do you guys know what to do? I am not as experienced in the golf club department.

Thanks in advance

I have made one hole in one this far. While you are reading this, I am most likely out on the tee trying to sink another one


Posted
If you don't mind about forgiveness, go with the FT-9...my opinion it hits longer than both the iq and superquad and still gives you the aesthetics you'd like

In my Titleist 2014 9.5" Staff bag:

Cobra Bio+ 9* Matrix White Tie X  - Taylormade SLDR 15* ATTAS 80X - Titleist 910H 19* ATTAS 100X - Taylormade '13 TP MC 4-PW PX 6.5 - Vokey TVD M 50* DG TI X100 - Vokey SM4 55 / Vokey SM5 60* DG TI S400 - Piretti Potenza II 365g


Posted
You could probably get the Superquad pretty cheap by now.
I'd give it a try.

In my Tour Combo Bag:

Driver: Superquad 9.5°
5W: 2008 Burner 18°
3H: Idea Pro Gold 20°4H: 2008 Burner Rescue 22°Irons: MP52 R300 5-PWedges: Vokey SM 50.08, 54.11, 58.04, 60.11Putter: Itsy Bitsy SpiderBall: TP Red


Posted
My vote is the TM. Long and straight when I hit it. It has an interesting feel to it to me... almost soft. Not insert soft like a putter but... softer than most. Some of friends felt the same and didn't like it at all. I don't think you'll go wrong with either choice though.

Wishon Driver
Callaway 5 Wood
Ping G5 Hybrid
Adams A4 7-PW

TM 56 and 60 Wedges

Yes Sophia Flat Stick


Posted
I'd reccomend the superquad because of both price and performance. I think you're the only person I've met who likes the look of the FT-IQ. Personally I would rate it as the ugliest club I have ever seen. But that's not the reason I'm reccomending the Superquad over it.

In my stand bag:
909D3 with 10.5 degrees of loft and a 45 inch Fujikura Rombax 6Z08, x-flex
909F3 15* with a stock Diamana Blue
FT 18* with an Aldila NV
X-forged ('07), 3-PW with Project X 6.0 CG12, 53/11, and 58* with DSG Red X2, 33"All with Lamkin Crossline Full Cord. (except the putter of...


Posted
If you are looking for a driver that is made for distance then the Cleveland Hi-Bore Monster is what your looking for, its ugly but it carries miles and stays pretty straight

Posted
If you are looking for a driver that is made for distance then the Cleveland Hi-Bore Monster is what your looking for, its ugly but it carries miles and stays pretty straight

the Monster is

THE most forgiving driver i have EVER hit by far

Posted
What conclusion can I draw from this? Haha...

I hope to see more responses, as it seems there`s pretty spread meanings.

Edit: Also; I`ve never been disappointed by Taylor Made, I have a iron set from them, my dad has the TM Burner driver (I recommended it to him, as I loved it, and now he loves it too). I also use Taylor Made balls.

I have made one hole in one this far. While you are reading this, I am most likely out on the tee trying to sink another one


Posted

Have you considered Tour burner?
I have recently gone back to my R7 425 TP, its still the best driver ive ever hit! Love the looks and feel, and the face is not closed, wich help me avoid my super Mega Hooks


Posted
I'm a taylormade guy. I just like their stuff better then Callaway, look, feel, etc. Eventhough I'm a bit biased, I'd say go for the superquad. It's a bit outdated in TM's line, even though it's not that old of a model and is a great club so your prices on it will be much better than the iQ.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I recently went through buying a new driver experience and ended up (finally) with the TaylorMade R7 Limited. I hit pretty much every driver made the last 3-4 years or so and it basically came down to the R7 Ltd., Mizuno MP-600 and the Adams Speedline. I liked those 3 because of feel and sound (plus the Miz and TM recently had huge price drops). I tried all of the Callaway drivers as well, including the FT-i, FT-i LCG, FT-5, FT-9 and the FT-iQ. Of all of them I probably prefered the feel and ball flight of the FT-5 the best, with the FT-iQ second, but I just don't like the sound of the Callaway drivers - it drives me nuts.

When it comes down to it I think the SuperQuad is the best deal because it can be tweaked to address issues with your ball flight that might come up from time to time. With that said, it's really important that you hit these drivers yourself (as well as other models - try not to be biased against other manufacturers/models without trying them as objectively as possible). I hate the sound of Callaway, but some people like it much better than the sounds of other drivers.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Posted
FT-iQ in a heartbeat.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5


Posted
Okay, now I`ve received an offer for a TaylorMade SQ Proto 282. It`s mine for 400$. Never heard of the "proto 282", what is good about it and is it worth 400 dollars?

I have made one hole in one this far. While you are reading this, I am most likely out on the tee trying to sink another one


Posted

I will prompt my answer with this: I play the FT-9 and it's the longest driver I have ever played. I am consistently hitting it 300 yds. Now my answer...Superquad. A friend of mine who I play a lot with uses one and he can do everything with it. Bomb it and work it. I pick the superquad as my response only because of the choices...I don't know how anyone can hit the iQ it just looks funny at address.

If you are willing to take other options and it seems that cost is not a factor, try the FT-9. It's the best driver I have ever hit, and I am a club ho. I try a lot of drivers every year.

|Callaway I-MIX FT-9  - Driver | Callaway Diablo Octane - 3 Wood | Callaway Diablo Edge Tour [3H & 4H] - Hybrids | Callaway X-forged 2009 - Irons | Callaway JAWS [52, 56, 60] - Wedges | SC Studio Style Newport 2 / Laguna 1.5 / Kombi-S - Putter |
 


Posted
I play the superquad w/ a ust v2 x flex.... i've played it for a while now and its an absolute rocket launcher... great driver!! can't comment on the iq cause i've never put it in play!! but the quad is solid
Posted
I havn't hit either, but I was in your same dilemma yesterday between the Burner and the Diablo. I went with TM and I couldn't be happier. I got it and the fairway wood and love them. Hope this helps.

In my Nexos Bag

Burner Driver 9.5*
Burner fairway 3 wood
755 Irons Tri Spec S Shafts 585 19* Hybrid w/ Aldilia NV S Shaft 3DX 23* Hybrid Tour 58* wedge CG 12 56* Wedge NCX-Ray Alpha Putter


Note: This thread is 6095 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.