Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6798 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
  oct411 said:
Steel is still better than graphite in irons and will probably always be true.

Bogus advice.

  oct411 said:
Cause even if you put the most expansive and best performing graphite in irons you still won't get better distance in irons and you don't need to, it's not the purpose of the irons. Unless you are a senior, lady, or kid, graphite might benefit.

Bogus advice. It's already been pointed out that several PGA Tour players use graphite in their irons. They're not "seniors, ladies, or kids" and it's not for lack of distance.

  oct411 said:
You can get better distance with graphite in drivers and woods. Moreover it's unnecessary as irons should not hit as far as woods since that's their purpose.

Bogus advice.

  oct411 said:
So distance is not an issue, and steel has lower torque and better control than graphite anyways.

Bogus advice.

That about sums it up. I leave for a day and come back to two threads - this one and one about shafts - in which this "oct411" character has shouted out all sorts of nonsense. I'm glad to see it was defeated and shown to be nonsense by other more knowledgeable members, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen, either. Our collective eyes are on you, oct411.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  oct411 said:
Steel is still better than graphite in irons and will probably always be true.

That was not an advice

It was an opinion, a point of view. That's the essentiality of a online forum, to have your own opinion, thanks. What a shame, I thought that you would know that by now after what, let see... 4,883 posts? The truth is that, I can care less if you agree or disagree to ANY of my opinion. If you like to spend $400+ to reshaft your irons to Graphite shafts or buy a new irons set with Graphite shafts and pay $200 or $300 more than the steel shaft version, GO RIGHT AHEAD BUDDY Waste your money, it's not my money. Like I have said. I do just fine with 15+ yr old original ZZ-lite steel shafts in my Ping Eye 2... FYI I paid less than $200 for the set and it probably plays better than 90% of the iron sets the members own on here Wait wait, are you going to rip on my old ass Ping Eye 2 irons next??? lol...
  None said:
Our collective eyes are on you, oct411.

2Pac Babe, West Coast Babe, Thug Life!!!

All eyez on ME! Oh my eyes are on you, to see if there are any useful information here, if at all that is...

  • Administrator

[QUOTE=oct411;27993]It was an opinion, a point of view.[quote]

You seem to have missed the point - and that point was that you were not only wrong, but that because you were wrong, you were giving bad advice. Bad "facts" can be bad advice when they're given to try to answer someone's question (especially when they're asking for advice). Both Everardo and gas_can - two folks who know a helluva lot about clubfitting - called you on it.
  oct411 said:
The truth is that, I can care less if you agree or disagree to ANY of my opinion.

And I care very much about bad information being passed on to the members of this forum.

  oct411 said:
Like I have said. I do just fine with 15+ yr old original ZZ-lite steel shafts in my Ping Eye 2... FYI I paid less than $200 for the set and it probably plays better than 90% of the iron sets the members own on here

Good for you. Now kindly take this portion of the conversation offline (PMs) or drop it.

This thread has run its course.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6798 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nice mate, very nice. I'd say forget about weight until what you're doing stops working and go win some beers from your mates while you're in the zone!   
    • Weight shift is next on the list but I need to groove this new feel and then work it back to a better shot shape. I started with a path +5 degrees out and a clubface -8 degrees. Hook city Ended with a path -0.5 and clubface +5. Straight fade/slice   So now just to dial it back a touch. 
    • Whatever works best for you. Koodos.
    • Geez I love seeing improvement like that. Well done. As someone whose "natural" swing is out to in 2-3 degrees I have to really stay on my front side (like 80%) to get that back to closer to 0 or even + for a draw. A big backswing also makes the path even worse. On the contrary a really short backswing with heavy front foot creates a hook. And to clarify, I feel that weight through my foot, knee and hip, it's not just leaning to the front side, it's almost like winding the coil in that front leg. That's probably the exact opposite of what the textbooks say? Perhaps because the textbooks are for guys who hit the ball well with an in to out club path struggle taming a hook?? For some reason ANY conscious weight transfer to my back foot exacerbates everything and stops me getting through the ball and I stand up off the ball. When I'm trying to hit a cut I don't consciously hold weight forward (but I make sure I don't transfer back) and it works. I have very bad hips, knees, shoulders from decades of (falling off) motorbikes and (falling off) surfboards so I can only do what I can do       I have found this "weight" approach works better for me than "try to swing in to out" using any method as I then lose impact angle and distance. With say an 8-iron I will lose 20m from my best shot even if it's a +2 path, because I just cannot get everything to work together.   I don't know if any of that helps - I am certainly a trial and error guy and not a coach with any kind of theory to back up my ponderings - but I am learning what works for me by making weight my number one swing thought.
    • TRIGGER WARNING: This will upset MANY people. I WAS experimenting with various forms of these. I am about 70% red/green colourblind so to me, these balls stand out yellow, not fluoro yellow, but yellow nonetheless. This colourblindness also affects my brain's interpretation of blue/purple and I have trouble distinguishing between browns and greens if they are in the distance etc, making golf one sunnuva in summer here when the course is cooked. To non CB people these are a dirty yellow (so I am told) and are very hard to see on the course. So while I can find my own balls easier than a white-only ball using a marker, my playing partners helping me look for a wayward ball cannot, and I found I was losing more shots by not having that extra help when the chips were down. And although this was done with "permanent marker" it was invaluable in telling me if I was hitting off the toe. I'd actually recommend it to anyone to use for a round or for practice and have a look after each shot what shot shape happened after different strikes. Yes, it puts some muck on your club face, but yes it rubs off quite easily, and I may be colourblind but I'm not certainly less worried about the temporary aesthetic assault on my clubs than if I'm drinking my playing partners' free beer at the end of a winning round. Anyway I've learned to stick to fluoro yellow so I can see them and my buddies can too. And they've stopped feeling like vomiting and their OCD has calmed down big time since they had to stop looking at them on the tee and green.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...