Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6043 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK, now that I'm getting more active on the site, I notice a big theme is wedges. I've had one Wilson Staff Midsize 56* SW with virtually no bounce that I've always used as an 11 Iron (90-105 yards with a full swing, good around the greens but can't hit it from a bunker). For bunkers, I still carry an old Hogan Radial that I can't hit from anywhere aside from sand (and I'm not very good from the sand with it, to boot). I tried a 60* wedge for a while but found that I could make any of the same shots with my Wilson SW, and that was even when I was playing a lot and down around a 6. I've sort of seen that SW as my "partner in crime" and over 15 years have figured out a way to do just about anything with it.

Question is, it's quite warn and doesn't impart the sort of spin I'd imagine a SW should. It's also far from a precision wedge (it's not even the RM forged, it's the cavity back, which I'm posting a photo of here). So would all those shots I've learned to hit with this club transfer easily to something with fresh grooves and better technology? Would I just be better off sharpening the grooves of this one? Might I keep this one as a 100-yard club, then find something more versatile than the Hogan that I can hit from the sand and inside 70 yards?

I'd love some suggestions from the gang about some wedge combos I should consider as I really concentrate on improving inside 100 yards this season, especially since I've a club to add now. I've got lots of length off the tee, and have never been able to capitalize because I simply don't stick it tight enough with my wedges and I turn too maybe birdies into pars and bogeys. There's the saying it's not the putter, it's the putter. Is this the case on wedges, too? Or am I placing myself at a significant disadvantage playing with what are basically 2 afterthought SWs that I never even considered replacing until now? I can see how you can grow emotionally attached to a putter and make it work for you over 20-30 years, but it seems wedges don't necessarily work the same way thanks to technology and grooves.

Thoughts?

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"


Posted
Clearly I'm not fit to lace your boots, in terms of handicap, but something occurs to me immediately from what you say:

You hit the ball well, but have a shonky short game. You only play one knackered old wedge. Most pro's play three wedges. They have very good short games, and it's key to their scoring well.

Like I say, you're a better player than me, but having recently bought a range of wedges, and starting to work on my short game, I'm getting better. I'm sure you would too.

In the bag:

Driver: 975D 10.5° True Temper EI-70 Stiff (Alternate 8.5° Titleist Stiff Graphite Shaft)
Fairway Woods: 975F (2 From) 14.5°, 18.5° True Temper EI-70 Stiff, 20.5° Titleist Stiff Graphite Shaft
3Iron-PW: S58 Dynamic Gold S300 ShaftsGap Wedge: Tour-W 54/10 Nickel...


Posted
Your playing off a 12 and been using those clubs as your short game arsenal?!?! Get a 56* Vokey spin milled and enjoy the show.

Posted

If you have the money, a 52º and 56/58º wedge is what I would recommend. The 52º is normally 4º more lofted than the PW, so it would be your 11 iron. If you get the 56/58 with 10-14º bounce it will work great from the sand and fluffy lies.

Putters I don't see the problem in using for decades, but irons, especially wedges will be worn. Grooves, grip etc. Also the technology gets better and clubs are easier to hit.

That said, don't expect wonders to happen. Learning to use a wedge is more important than having a good one. You can do well with your 56º if you utilize it properly, though I'd prefer one with more bounce. If you are not to keen on spending money on wedges, I'd recommend you buy a short game book to learn the proper technique. There are several out there; Stan Utley, David Peltz, Phil Mickelson etc. They got some different ways to hit a wedge and the idea behind the shot, but if you master any of the techniques, the result is usually pretty much the same.

I bought Utley's book and my short game has improved immensely. Now, if I only got my long game in order, perhaps I could make some progress.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah, I guess it didn't take much convincing. The sad thing is, when I was mid-single digits a decade ago, I was playing with the same wedges. Never thought anything of it.

My plan was to pick up a Vokey Design 60 degree Lob Wedge (260-06) (says in the ad it's virtually new) that I saw on ebay and have my fingers crossed I can get cheap (what would you guys consider cheap? $30? $50? $75?) I'm trying to do my homework quickly, and it seems this isn't a spin milled, but not sure how big a leap it is between the two (titleist.com actually lists the 200-series as more expensive). Thought I could pair this up with my Wilson SW for now, but also thinking of going for the gusto and going right into a 56* Vokey, too.

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"


Posted
If you have the money, a 52º and 56/58º wedge is what I would recommend. The 52º is normally 4º more lofted than the PW, so it would be your 11 iron. If you get the 56/58 with 10-14º bounce it will work great from the sand and fluffy lies.

Man, now you've really got me thinking. I actually have room for a couple wedges, which is why I was thinking 56, then 60. I also just realized I have gap wedge from my Wilson Staff RM forged set, so I'll bring that out of the garage.

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"


Posted
OK, lost that ebay auction, which I'm kind of glad since I rushed in. I hope I'm not being needy asking for so much advice. But I think it's really fun and interesting to open it up to you guys. Like I've said, I was really involved in all facets of the game years ago, and had really scaled back to very casual (couple rounds a year). Now hearing all your different ideas is great and I really appreciate it.

Maybe I can pose this question -- make up my wedge mix. I've got $100 to spend on two wedges (figuring I can live with the Wilson gap wedge). I need something for 85-100 yards as well as greenside to replace my Wilson SW. And I need something to hit out of traps. Thoughts?

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"


Posted
I used to use just a SW and a LW (about 54 and 58).

I picked up a good set of Cleveland wedges and went with 54* and 60*. That worked alright, but I didn't use the 54 a lot. It was a low bounce and not great out of the sand, or in soft lies. I only used it as the "11 iron" and didn't even do that very well.

Recently, I lost the 54* and bit the bullet on a 52* and 56* Mizuno to compliment the Cleveland. Man am I happy. They have more bounce than my old 54* and I actually took a few hours on a 120-yard short range to work out exact yardages and various different shot trajectories.

I'd say I may have shaved 1-2 strokes off my score. That's a lot for me. It hasn't hit my handicap yet, but I'm expecting to be back to the +2 range pretty soon, judging by my recent soring and confidence.

I got them two weeks ago and have already holed out once from the fairway and had several other kick-in birdies and it just feels like a new world having VERY specific yardages in the 125-80yd range.

I still stick to the 60* mostly around the greens, but I've been practicing a new sort of high-bump shot with the 52* that I expect to use a lot on medium length chips.

Driver: 905S 8* - Graffaloy Blue 65S Shaft (tipped 1" Short)
Fairway: 960F (15*, 19*)
Irons: T-Zoid Pro 4-PW w/ True Temper Steel
Wedges: MP-R Black 52*, 56*
Lob: 60* CG-10 (nice and rusty)Putter: OZ Putter (with oversized Winn Blue Grip)Ball:: One Tour


Posted
.....it just feels like a new world having VERY specific yardages in the 125-80yd range......

I'm in a different world to you, but this is the critical thing that seems to make a big difference to me. I have a range of wedges that I select from to compliment the course and conditions......irrespective of which wedges I choose to put in my bag on a given day the key seems to be that I'm hitting more full shots, known distances. Consequently I'm more accurate, I'm hitting the ball closer, and I'm taking fewer putts. Getting graded options inside 120 yards has seemed to make a big difference to my game - in practice I'm about 5 shots better than before (although obviously I have more shots to work with).

In the bag:

Driver: 975D 10.5° True Temper EI-70 Stiff (Alternate 8.5° Titleist Stiff Graphite Shaft)
Fairway Woods: 975F (2 From) 14.5°, 18.5° True Temper EI-70 Stiff, 20.5° Titleist Stiff Graphite Shaft
3Iron-PW: S58 Dynamic Gold S300 ShaftsGap Wedge: Tour-W 54/10 Nickel...


Posted
OK, now I'm on a roll. Bought a Vokey Design 260-06 on ebay last night for $29 (plus 10 shipping). Ad says it's virtually new. I'm pretty sure it's an older model, but seemed like a decent price so I'll have it in a few days and see how it goes. Next up is a Vokey 56* of some sort. I'll be on the lookout on ebay as between this wedge and the mint 906f2 I got for $49, I'm finding what seem to be pretty good bargains.

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"


Posted
I had a similar issue... But realized the issue was my SW (56* w/ 19* bounce), once I moved it back in my stance it got some decent trajectory.
But now I am looking to fill the gap between my PW (47* w/ 8* bounce) and SW, thinking something in the 52-54* range with a bounce of about 8-11* of bounce. I'm solid in the LW (60* w/ 3* of bounce) arena.
Was thinking about going with either a Cleveland, Titleist, or Mizuno GW...

In my Stand-Bag

905T D 9.5º
MX 700 3W 15º
AP2 3-PW DCI Oversize+ Black SW 56º 588 LW 60º DF 550 P


Posted
New poster here, been looking around for a few weeks.

Just started playing 6 months ago and finally learning to hit the ball with a little bit of consistency. Part of that consistency is the new equipment (A3 iron set, Speedline Draw D & 3W). I do not have any wedges and just purchased the Wason Set online and it is currently in the mail.

I am hitting the green with good consistency with a pitching wedge from 90yds or so in but frequently find the ball rolling off the green after it lands. Because of this I'd like to have some more bite on my ball so I purchased the wedges (and ya gotta have wedges!).

So to make a long story short should I look into the Vokey wedges and possibly send the Adams set back? Would they make much difference in the hands of a newbie shooting in the 100's when compared to the Watson's?

-Mike

Posted
I am hitting the green with good consistency with a pitching wedge from 90yds or so in but frequently find the ball rolling off the green after it lands. Because of this I'd like to have some more bite on my ball so I purchased the wedges (and ya gotta have wedges!).

To be honest, if the PW isn't holding, the GW isn't going to hold either.

You need to generate a cleaner contact and more clubhead speed before you will get into the RPM range to get the ball to stop quickly. Keep working on solid contact and making a descending blow on the ball. Take a divot that starts right at the FRONT edge of the ball. You will get more spin. New clubs won't help as much as I think you may be hoping.

Driver: 905S 8* - Graffaloy Blue 65S Shaft (tipped 1" Short)
Fairway: 960F (15*, 19*)
Irons: T-Zoid Pro 4-PW w/ True Temper Steel
Wedges: MP-R Black 52*, 56*
Lob: 60* CG-10 (nice and rusty)Putter: OZ Putter (with oversized Winn Blue Grip)Ball:: One Tour


Posted
To be honest, if the PW isn't holding, the GW isn't going to hold either.

This is what I was looking to verify... Thanks!

Note: This thread is 6043 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.