Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5992 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Read the book, tried out both each for over 3 months and never felt comfortable with either one. I would hit alot of fat shots with the 1 plane and slice the hell out of the 2 plane.

So i went back to my home made swing and am hitting the ball much better. So is this normal or should I really try to fit myself with one of these swings?

Also when I get my video camera in the mail I'll post a video of my swing and you can critique it later.

What's in my sweet Sun Mountain Bag
Driver: 10.5 SuperQuad
3-Wood: Burner
5-Wood: G10
Hybrids: 23 26 Gold Pro Irons: Slingshot 6-A Wedge: 54 & 58 Scratch  Putter: White Ice #1 Gotta have balls: Vapor


Posted
Well you have to have either a one plane or two plane swing, so your "homemade" swing is one or the other. I have a two plane.

A quote from Kris
...is that college bball really isn't "lower tier". The better teams have their rosters filled with guys who could play in the NBA. hell, guys used to come straight from high school to the NBA. I really don't think there's much of a difference skill-wise between the two.


Posted
Maybe I should rephrase the question.
In the book he states that certain things (like grip, posture, width of stance, spine angle) will either help or hinder if you are a 1 or 2 plane swinger.

Take for example if you have a 1 plane swing but a narrow stance (I think this is a part of my swing), this will cause problems. But for me it is the oppisite. Just wondering if that is normal.

Like anyone have a super strong grip but uses a two plane setup?

What's in my sweet Sun Mountain Bag
Driver: 10.5 SuperQuad
3-Wood: Burner
5-Wood: G10
Hybrids: 23 26 Gold Pro Irons: Slingshot 6-A Wedge: 54 & 58 Scratch  Putter: White Ice #1 Gotta have balls: Vapor


Posted

I have no idea what I have. I just swing the golf club.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
That book is completely wrong. What they call a "one plane swing" is actually a "one angle swing", or even a "many planes at the same angle swing".

The "one plane swing" described in that book starts with the club shaft at an angle defined by a line from the grip to the ball. Then as the club rotates back, they show the angle of the club remaining the same, but raising up onto a different plane, even though that new plane is at the same angle it started out on.

This has created a great deal of confusion for guys like me and Tiger Woods and Adam Scott, who really do get the club up onto one plane about half way back in the back swing, and then move the club up and down to the ball on that one plane.

I think the one plane swing described in that book should be called the corkscrew swing, or the helicopter swing, not the one plane swing. The modern golf swing of Tiger Woods and Adam Scott is the real one plane swing.

907D2 driver and 906D4 3 wood
Idea Pro Gold 3 4 5 hybrids
Apex Plus 6 7 8 9 E irons
900 52 gap 56 sand 60 lob wedges
Rossa Suzuka Putter


  • Administrator
Posted
The "one plane swing" described in that book starts with the club shaft at an angle defined by a line from the grip to the ball. Then as the club rotates back, they show the angle of the club remaining the same, but raising up onto a different plane, even though that new plane is at the same angle it started out on.

I always understood the one plane to be "the plane of your shoulders." If your arms were on that line at the top, one plane. If they were above it (nobody's really ever below it), they were two-plane.

I have the book - but I can't say I really even read it. I think that what I said is what it says in there, though...? Am I wrong? My swing, by my definition, is closer to one plane than two. It'd be "flat" to a two-planer.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
.

I'd beware of those kind of generalizations I have shorter legs, longer torso and KJ Choi arms. I find a wide stance kind of inhibits my rotation (right now), but that's just me. I'm not a spring chicken either so that lack of flexibility and overindulgence in other static weight handling sports comes into it. Sure some of these things are gonna be different strokes for diffr'nt folks.

........................................
McGolf-Doggie's stand bag & new and used club emporium:
Putter :ping: 1/2Craz-e | Irons :TaylorMade: RAC MB, 4i-PW (DG S300) |Wedges :Cleveland: SW&LW 56*DSG+RTG; 60*/4* DSG+RTG |Woods :Cobra: S1 5W; Adams TIght Lies 3W |Driver :TaylorMade: Burner 9.5 Fujikura Reax S | Maxfli Practice


Note: This thread is 5992 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yea, I think the first thing is to define block, variable, and random practice with regards to golf.  The easiest one might be in practicing distance control for putting. Block practice would be just hitting 50 putts from 5 feet, then 50 putts from 10 ft then 50 putts from 15 ft. While random practice would having a different distance putt for every putt.  In terms of learning a new motor pattern, like let's say you want to make sure the clubhead goes outside the hands in the backswing. I am not sure how to structure random practice. Maybe block practice is just making the same 100 movements over and over again. I don't get how a random practice is structured for something like learning a new motor pattern for the golf swing.  Like, if a NFL QB needs to work on their throw. They want to get the ball higher above the shoulder. How would random practice be structured? Would they just need someone there to say, yes or no for feedback? That way the QB can go through an assortment of passing drills and throws trying to get the wright throwing motion?  For me, how do you structure the feedback and be time effective. Let's say you want to work on the club path in the backswing. You go out to the course to get some random practice. Do you need to set up the camera at each spot, check after each shot to make it random?  I know that feedback is also a HUGE part of learning. I could say, I went to the golf course and worked on my swing. If I made 40 golf swings on the course, what if none of them were good reps because I couldn't get any feedback? What if I regressed? 
    • I found it odd that both Drs. (Raymond Prior and Greg Rose) in their separate videos gave the same exact math problem (23 x 12), and both made the point of comparing block practice to solving the same exact math problem (23 x 12) over and over again. But I've made the point that when you are learning your multiplication tables… you do a bunch of similar multiplications over and over again. You do 7 x 8, then 9 x 4, then 3 x 5, then 2 x 6, and so on. So, I think when golf instructors talk about block practice, they're really not understanding what it actually is, and they're assuming that someone trying to kinda do the same thing is block practice, but when Dr. Raymond Prior said on my podcast that what I was describing was variable practice… then… well, that changes things. It changes the results of everything you've heard about how "block" practice is bad (or ineffective).
    • Day 121 12-11 Practice session this morning. Slowing the swing down. 3/4 swings, Getting to lead side better, trying to feel more in sync with swing. Hit foam balls. Good session overall. 
    • Wordle 1,636 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,636 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.