Leger Designs Logo

[Jax]

thoughts?

[Drennen13]

Pretty lame.... Lol what are they for?

[Jax]

Pretty lame.... Lol what are they for?

coming from a lame man haha jking it a logo for what i hope to be soon doing

[Drennen13]

coming from a lame man haha jking it a logo for what i hope to be soon doing

And that would beeee???

[Jax]

And that would beeee???

graphic design.

[clearwaterms]

to be honest - Both need work. Right idea, but not nearly polished enough. The word Jarrett looks like you just pasted it over the first name. Does that make sense?

[Ed_Bighead]

to be honest - Both need work. Right idea, but not nearly polished enough. The word Jarrett looks like you just pasted it over the first name. Does that make sense?

Yeah, it's hard to tell that the 'G' is a 'G'.

[Ben]

to be honest - Both need work. Right idea, but not nearly polished enough. The word Jarrett looks like you just pasted it over the first name. Does that make sense?

Yeah, I hear you on the polished look. It is really close though. I like the top one better (without the picture). How about "design"

under the "E", not on top. I agree with the "G" comment as well. Needs to look more like a "G".

[Jax]

Yeah, I hear you on the polished look. It is really close though. I like the top one better (without the picture). How about "design"

Thanks i will take all your comments in consideration also here is a portfolio design iam working on its shrieked so its all put together

[Shorty]

Too much going on.
With logo design that involves type, sometimes you can be lucky with the letters you have to work with - for example, in Bad Boy you have the good fortune to have the d in bad and the b in boy working like a mirror image, or in adidas a series of circles.
With yours, unfortunately, the G gets confused when you paste stuff on top.
I would probably be inclined to lose the "Jarrett" completely - maybe try something like LEGER on its own with the second E reversed. Don't superimpose the "Designs" bit over anything. Experiment with the location of that word.

[marpr]

i dont think you should put a photo of yourself as part of the logo.

[Iowa Hawkeye]

Try going with more of an overlay than a cut out. I would also change to a different font face. For this purpose, I'd say smooth and simple is best, don't try to show off your work with a cutting edge logo. That can often turn people off because if they don't like the look of the logo they will judge your work based on it.

[deronsizemore]

Here are my thoughts.

1. Too cluttered. A logo should be something simple. Something you can build a brand around.

2. "designs" too small. The logo should work well at small sizes and large sizes. This logo won't work at a small size because you cannot read the word "designs."

3. Kerning seems to be off. In "Leger," There' smore space between the "GE" than the other letters. The spacing between the "ER" is smaller than "LEG."

On the word "Jarrett," the "ARR" are close together with no spacing while the "ETT" seems to have a couple pixels of spacing.

The word "designs" is the same way. Some letters are touching, others are not.

4. I definitely wouldn't put a photograph in the logo either as it's going to look really bad when sized down smaller.

Here's a website I developed and maintain: logogala.com (hopefully I can post it here). Check out some of the designs to get some ideas. Hope that helps.