Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6304 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
i started playing golf in may and i use mb's and pure the ball 98% of the time.

Impossible. PGA Tour pros don't pure the ball 98% of the time.

Nice sticks, though

Cleveland Launcher Comp, 9.5* stiff
TaylorMade V-Steel, T/S stiff
Cleveland Halo, 19* stiff
Mizuno MP-32, stiff
Cleveland 588 Gunmetal, 51*Cleveland 588 DSG RTG, 56*Scotty Cameron Newport II


Posted
You would be insane to go the MB's having just started playing this year... this discussion comes up over and over again on these boards.

Fair enough, in my

5th-month of playing golf, I just got back from my local 18-hole course after breaking 90 for the 1st time (I got 87) using this setup: Nike Sasquatch Sumo: driver Nike Sasquatch: 3-Wood Mizuno MX-19: 3, 4, 9-Iron, PW Titleist 695MB: 5, 6, 7, 8-Iron Titleist Vokey SM56: SW Odyssey White-Hot: blade-putter Luck? Insanity? Egotistical? No - just a lot of practice and an easy swing. Forged blades are as easy or difficult as you want them to be.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
To be honest most high handicap golfers don't know what a good strike is, so when they come in having had a "great ball striking day" I would come in fuming and wanting to give up golf.
There is a massive different between a 'proper strike' and what a high handicapper thinks is a good strike, there for high handicappers remain ignorant believing they are ready and good enough for blades while us golfers who can strike a ball know fully well they are not at a good enough level to use blades effectively, i find it highly amusing that people off 20 genuinely believe they can hit blades, but ignorance is bliss lol

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
To be honest most high handicap golfers don't know what a good strike is, so when they come in having had a "great ball striking day" I would come in fuming and wanting to give up golf.

You're right - 'improper ball striking' using forged blades really is damaging my game.

TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
there for high handicappers remain ignorant believing they are ready and good enough for blades

Keep tootin' your horn, buddy. Rich, play whatever sticks you feel comfortable swinging. If you don't hit the blades well right now, I guarantee you will learn very quickly how to hit them solid because you will have the truest feedback with them.

Driver: 905R 9.5*
3-wood: 906F 13*
Irons: Forged Blades
Wedges: Black Satin SV Tour 52* , 56*, 60*
Putter: FuturaBall: ProV1x or One Platinum---------------------------------------------------------My 2008 Tournament Qualifiers:Tennessee State Match Play - Qualified - July...


Posted
Keep tootin' your horn, buddy.

Yeah, I know what you mean....but some people on here have that 'holier'-than-thou' attitude and the thought of someone picking up a blade and swinging it/hitting correctly with it in short time just befuddles them.

Kind of amusing, really. Anyway, I can't stop going on about this - I need to go and test out the Titleist 695MB 2-Iron I've just purchased.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
Keep tootin' your horn, buddy.

Yes i can strike the ball, and why take shame in saying it but i would hardly call that "tootin' my horn" would you like to explain how its "tootin' my horn"??

And in saying that 20 handicappers cant strike a ball well enough to hit blades, common sense? yes, controversial? no so where is the issue in what i said? Some of the people on this forum do make me laugh, every 20 handicapper can hit his blades perfectly and hit his nice long 300 yard drive and some people who i would of thought no better argues on the side of the high handicapper, it baffles me, anyway I'm going to go and toot my horn cheers buddy!

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
Yes i can strike the ball, and why take shame in saying it but i would hardly call that "tootin' my horn" would you like to explain how its "tootin' my horn"??

Sure. You come in this thread, start calling this guy "ignorant" because you feel that just because his handicap is 20+ and that yours is 5.x, that you can tell him that he isn't in fact hitting the ball solid? And then you use the phrase, "believing they are ready and good enough for blades while us golfers who can strike a ball," to practically call this guy an idiot because god forbid a 20+ handicap be able to differentiate a solid shot from a mishit.

And in saying that 20 handicappers cant strike a ball well enough to hit blades, common sense? yes, controversial? no so where is the issue in what i said?

Where is the issue?? Why can't a 20+ handicapper hit blades?

Here is a little story, a true story: One of my fraternity brothers starts playing golf this summer. He goes to the driving range a few times, plays a few rounds of golf, etc. He doesn't practice much. I go back to school one weekend and play a round of golf with him. He is borrowing another brothers Macgregor blades. To make a long story short, he goes on to hit at least 75% of his iron shots pure with a nice high cut. His problem is a combination of driving, chipping, and putting. So tell me again why a 20+ handicapper can't hit a muscleback, because I know he isn't anywhere close to a 20 handicap.
Some of the people on this forum do make me laugh, every 20 handicapper can hit his blades perfectly and hit his nice long 300 yard drive and some people who i would of thought no better argues on the side of the high handicapper, it baffles me, anyway I'm going to go and toot my horn cheers buddy!

I do know better. I know better than to criticize someone because of what golf equipment they want to use. Everyone is different and approaches the game differently. I don't understand why people get this god complex with golf and think they are the only ones that can, in this case, hit a muscleback iron. It's ridiculous.

Driver: 905R 9.5*
3-wood: 906F 13*
Irons: Forged Blades
Wedges: Black Satin SV Tour 52* , 56*, 60*
Putter: FuturaBall: ProV1x or One Platinum---------------------------------------------------------My 2008 Tournament Qualifiers:Tennessee State Match Play - Qualified - July...


Posted

Zach Johnson plays the 695CBs. He won the Masters.

Whatever rings in your loins when you hit it in the sweet spot, boys...whatever works.

Lowest score works, eh?

We're talking about the 695MBs vs. the 695CBs, right?

:)


Posted
Please don't judge ppl's ball striking ability by their handicaps.
iron is merely part of the game that contributes toward the handicap.

Launcher 460 10.5° <BB Solution 130 R>
Wishon 949MC 16.5° <SK Fiber Tour Trac 80 R>
3DX DC Ironwood 20°, 23° <UST SR2 R>
MX-23 5-PW <KBS Tour R>
Vokey 250.08, SM54.10, SM58.08 <DG Wedge> Callie 33.75"TLT Series 4MOI matched


Posted
Sure. You come in this thread, start calling this guy "ignorant" because you feel that just because his handicap is 20+ and that yours is 5.x, that you can tell him that he isn't in fact hitting the ball solid? And then you use the phrase, "believing they are ready and good enough for blades while us golfers who can strike a ball," to practically call this guy an idiot because god forbid a 20+ handicap be able to differentiate a solid shot from a mishit.

FIJI, leave it....it's not the first thread that I've had to go to toe-to-toe with certain posters who claim exactly the opposite of what you've just said.

Like I said before, it's gotta hurt when a guy who's been practising for years meets a guy who just picked up a blade golf club and he strikes it consistently well. It's almost like, "How dare you?!?"
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
Like I said before, it's gotta hurt when a guy who's been practising for years meets a guy who just picked up a blade golf club and he strikes it consistently well.

For the record I have been playing golf for 3 years, and held a handicap for 2 years, and I am 17 so i haven't been playing for years and also for the record it's not sour grapes if you can hit blades fair play, But as i think Fiji said, his mate hits it pure 75% of the time and then assumes it justifies blades, just my opinion but the purpose of blades is to make it easier to control the ball, and they way the ball spins etc, if your telling me that a 20+ handicap knows how to do this i suppose who am I too argue.

At the end of the day it's up to you as a golfer to play what you want to play, maybe i shouldn't of got so heated but the obsession with blades baffles me as its not going to be the best for your game, IMO Also apologies to anyone i have offended/annoyed in recent threads.

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
[QUOTE=JaY_B;93840]But as i think Fiji said, his mate hits it pure 75% of the time and then assumes it justifies blades, [QUOTE]

I didn't assume it justifies blades, nor does he assume that. I was just simply stating that even someone that has just taken up the game and barely practices can in fact hit solid shots with a muscleback. I find it hard to believe that someone that practices more wouldn't be able to increase his percentage of solid shots.

Driver: 905R 9.5*
3-wood: 906F 13*
Irons: Forged Blades
Wedges: Black Satin SV Tour 52* , 56*, 60*
Putter: FuturaBall: ProV1x or One Platinum---------------------------------------------------------My 2008 Tournament Qualifiers:Tennessee State Match Play - Qualified - July...


Posted
Every golfer in the world can hit solid shots with any type of club, the point I tried to make in my previous post was that the design of blades allows you to control and influence the golf ball, and how many people are honestly at that level? most single figure handicap golfers are not at that level, and i very much doubt that many, if not any novice golfers (in reference to your mate) has the amount of control and experience required to use blades effectively
To quote from Tiger Wood's book How i play golf in relation to Blades "I love them - they provide wonderful feedback and feel. But I've practised many hours to learn to play these kinds of clubs. Most amateurs, however, would be better served by some kind of sole-heavy, cavity back design, which delivers good results on off-center hits and helps them get the ball in the air"

What else do you need to hear to appreciate my point of view?

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
Every golfer in the world can hit solid shots with any type of club, the point I tried to make in my previous post was that the design of blades allows you to control and influence the golf ball, and how many people are honestly at that level? most single figure handicap golfers are not at that level, and i very much doubt that many, if not any novice golfers (in reference to your mate) has the amount of control and experience required to use blades effectively

I never said that I did not appreciate your point of view. You have a right to post your opinion and I have the right to open discussion on that opinion given the nature of this website. However, I don't really appreicate the way you came off towards this guy trying to make him feel like an idiot because of the equipment he wants to use.

Also, don't take anything I say personally. It is not meant that way in any means.

Driver: 905R 9.5*
3-wood: 906F 13*
Irons: Forged Blades
Wedges: Black Satin SV Tour 52* , 56*, 60*
Putter: FuturaBall: ProV1x or One Platinum---------------------------------------------------------My 2008 Tournament Qualifiers:Tennessee State Match Play - Qualified - July...


Posted

Point taken, and have already apologised.

Lesson learnt though, no more posting at midnight i get moody lol

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
For the record I have been playing golf for 3 years, and held a handicap for 2 years, and I am 17 so i haven't been playing for years and also for the record it's not sour grapes if you can hit blades fair play, But as i think Fiji said, his mate hits it pure 75% of the time and then assumes it justifies blades, just my opinion but the purpose of blades is to make it easier to control the ball, and they way the ball spins etc, if your telling me that a 20+ handicap knows how to do this i suppose who am I too argue.

Okay, I see your point-of-view but I'm not some 'gear-head' who's just discovered golf and jumped in at the deep-end and gone out bought a full, brand new set of blades.

I'm not that stupid and I'm not that good. However, I have included the MB irons (5, 6, 8, PW) into my bag and I can hit them straight and I can get a good trajectory flight on them, e.g. I can land on the green off a 165yd, Par3 using the 695MB 7-Iron every time. However, what I can't do is consistently work the ball to the left/right of a hazard or a tree with these yet. So, if your 'you can't hit blades correctly' assumption is based on purely working the ball, then yes, you're right: I can't. But the argument continues: if I can hit those shots with a Mizuno MX-19, oversized, cavity-back...theh why change and make the game harder for myself? I can't really answer that apart from a) they look better, b) they feel a lot better on contact and c) they're improving the way I swing an iron. The more I play (and I play a lot : 3x a week at the driving range and 3x on the 18-hole every week , weather no issue), the better I get - and the proof is in my last round when I broke 90 for the 1st time. By the way, just for the record....I can't drive 300yds either. I can carry the ball maybe 265yds tops with a driver.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

  • 9 months later...
Posted
I'd like to know how this little expirement worked out. I'd bet the OP is probably around the same handicap less than a year later, maybe worse, after buying those blades.

I know, b/c I just got finished making the same mistake. Blades are earned. You just don't pick em' up and go out and have fun. You have to suffer for a long time before you get to actually figure out how to control the ball. By that time, you are ready for something more forgiving. I got the T-Shirt.

That other guy wasn't being condescending, he was just speaking the truth, and sometimes the truth just doesn't want to be heard.

Blades are indeed for "God Like" figures. Everyone eventually figures that out one way or another.

WITB:
Driver-B'stone J33R 9.5* Pro Force V2 65S 44.5"
3w/5w-B'stone J33R 15-18* NV75 Stiff
3h Ping G10 21* TFC Stiff
irons-Mizuno Pro II w/4-9, MP-T 47 PW, currently have DG S300. X100 Soft Stepped 1x or PX 6.0 are on stand by.GW Mizuno MP-T 53-9* DG R300LW Titleist Vokey SM 58-12* DG Wedge flexT...


Note: This thread is 6304 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.