Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5940 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
So in reviewing my stats I found that my putting average on GIR's is worse than when I don't get a GIR. I think it is one of two reasons

1. When I DO get a GIR it usually lands in a bad green location or far from the pin

or

2. I feel pressure when I should par the whole since im on in regulation. and i choke under pressure.

some other reasons could be:

- Non GIR's result in a quality chip/pitch since im not far off the green
- after a GIR I go for a birdie instead of the safer two putt approach and put myself in a 3 putt situation.

Do you guys tend to have these issues or are your putts on GIR in line with the rest of your average putts?

In my Golf bag
Big Bertha Irons
60* wedge
Hi-Bore Hybrid 3
Burner 3wood XLS Hi-Bore 10.5 Driver Putter On the feet Burner Balls


Posted
Thats weird. For mwe, looking at my stats, I usually always par the hole if I get a GIR. Its when I dont get the GIR I gain the strokes. Usually if I get a GIR though, even if the putt is within 10ft I try to get it 6 inches or so for a tap in. I think I have 3 putted 5 times that I had a GIR and thats becuase I tried to make the long Birdie putt and missed big time, causing me to have a tougher putt for par.

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not at all surprising or unusual for GIR holes to have higher putting averages from what I've seen (don't get enough GIR to have significant stats of my own...). Can't say whether you put the pressure on yourself or not, but the first effect is going to be big no matter what. Unless you're a miserable chipper, you'll be closer almost every time if you miss the green and chip on rather than rely on your long approach shot to put you on. This shouldn't be a problem though-- a 2-putt after a GIR is a par just the same as a 1-putt up and down. At least with the GIR you have a putt for birdie.

If you're putting differently when you have a birdie on the line, stop it!!

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
Your putts on greens that you do not reach in regulation will be less if most of your approach shots are just off the green and your short wedge shots are pretty good. IOW, if you can hit a lob wedge to within 10' every time, you should be one- or two-putting every time.

Personally, I am about even on both.

Driver: Burner 10.5 deg
5W: R7 18 deg
3H: Idea Tech
4-PW: MP-57
GW: Vokey 52 degSW: 56 degLW: 60 degPutter: Black Series 1 34"Ball: Pro V1


Posted
Not at all surprising or unusual for GIR holes to have higher putting averages... Unless you're a miserable chipper, you'll be closer almost every time if you miss the green and chip on rather than rely on your long approach shot to put you on.

Your putts on greens that you do not reach in regulation will be less if most of your approach shots are just off the green and your short wedge shots are pretty good.

Yes, exactly.

Thats weird. For me, looking at my stats, I usually always par the hole if I get a GIR. Its when I dont get the GIR I gain the strokes.

He's not saying he scores better when he misses the green. He's saying his putting average is lower when he misses the green. As the other guys pointed out, this is to be expected.

Bill


Posted
My approach to putting is to make the speed my first priority for anything outside of about 6ft, leaving myself a tap in for my second putt... and sometimes that first one actually falls.

Posted
It sounds likes its not too uncommon to have a higher putting average on GIR's. That would mean it is more likely because of the landing location on the green. I guess when missing the green the chip/pitch shot is more accurate than the GIR's approach shot. I think after landing a GIR then not taking the risky birdie putt attempt could help my overall score.

In my Golf bag
Big Bertha Irons
60* wedge
Hi-Bore Hybrid 3
Burner 3wood XLS Hi-Bore 10.5 Driver Putter On the feet Burner Balls


Posted
Do you guys tend to have these issues or are your putts on GIR in line with the rest of your average putts?

My GIR putts are higher then my average. I can contribute it to two things, I play a lot of older courses with small greens, so hitting them is a challenge. But they leave reasonable chip and putt situations, so I will average 4 to 6 one putt green per round. Second, when I do hit a green, I am pretty conservative on birdie putts, par is the score I am always looking to achieve, not birdie.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Posted
I think after landing a GIR then not taking the risky birdie putt attempt could help my overall score.

Yeah... every putt counts the same, so you just need to get where every putt is treated the same. Much easier said than done, but your best putt speed and line for a given position doesn't depend on how many strokes you've already taken.

Oh-- one other thought. Since counting putts is misleading, there are two other numbers that are better to use to look at your performance here. First, just look at your average score (relative to par) for GIR hit versus missed. You should see that you score better when you hit the GIR... this borders on being blatantly obvious, but if it's not true, then you really need to re-think your approach to birdie putts. Second is to look at number of putts versus length of first putt. Maybe divide this along GIR vs non-GIR. This tests the idea that the GIR putting average is higher simply because your first putt is longer. That's the usual assumption, and again, if you find differing statistics for GIR vs non-GIR, then you know what you need to focus on.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
I don't like that 2-putt instead of 3-putt school of thought. I'd much rather think 1-putt instead of 2-putt. I find a positive attitude to each putt makes it much more likely to drop.

Besides, I don't see what more risky about going for that birdie than going for a 2-putt. If you miss the hole by 3 feet you're not too bad, if you miss a 3 foot circle around the hole by 3 feet, you've left yourself an awkward par putt.

In my bag:
Driver: G10 10.5 TFC 129 Shaft
3 wood: R7 Steel
Hybrid: 585H 21 Degree
Irons 3-PW: 735.CMWedges: Vokey 52.08, 56.14Putter: White Hot XG #5


Posted
I think this should be expected. If you miss a green, a bad chip/pitch is 15 feet. I barely ever 3 putt from there. I often one putt.

Hit a green from 150, good shot is 20 feet. Could three putt.

I don't think it has anything to do with never. It is pure statistics.

Brian


Posted
I don't like that 2-putt instead of 3-putt school of thought. I'd much rather think 1-putt instead of 2-putt. I find a positive attitude to each putt makes it much more likely to drop.

Well put (putt?). I can only think of one reason why there'd be a difference between putting for a 1-putt vs 2-putt, which is that the ram-it-home option might be off the table since it becomes more important not to send the ball way past the hole. So really, aim to make every putt, but factor in wanting a makeable miss... not that different from general course management.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
I don't really get what's risky about trying to make a 15 footer? Whether it's for birdie or par it's all about speed and line. Am I a simpleton who's missing a crucial mental dimension on the green or something? If I am, then I don't want it. I'm pretty happy with my 1.7 per green.

Ben Hogan is my swing coach.

Driver: Burner TP
3 & 5 Woods: No-name
3H:No-name4i-PW: MP-32...unapologetically...You should try blades, too56*: CG12Putter: Spider


Note: This thread is 5940 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.