Jump to content
IGNORED

Michelle on Ryder Cup Team !


Note: This thread is 6473 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Michelle Wie on Ryder Team?

    • why not... 5, maybe 6 years from now?
      1
    • top 10 on the tour will be tough. No chance.
      5
    • Teenage dream, nothing else, not worth any attention.
      12
    • C'mon already, people are laughing at you !!!
      40


Recommended Posts

This is the silliest thread on the forum at the moment.

So, what am I doing posting here?

* exits, shaking head slowly .... *

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


I don't know guys, this could be a good thing. Can you imagine her at the age of twenty playing in the ryder cup wearing one of her famous skin tight mini skirts? That might distract a fella. She'd have to wear a shirt with a picture of a doughnut on it to distract Monty though.

T-Bone Marshall
Home Course: www.waldenponds.com (74.1/134) 7001 yds
in my bag
Driver: Big Ben cs3 10.5 Stiff/Draw set up
Fairway: Hogan Edge 3,5 metal:Irons: Hogan Radial-Apex shaftWedge: Hogan "Tom Kite" 56* Radial "E" wedgePutter: Affinity vr7 "V-Rod" pro-v1x ball2 markers, Disney divot tool,...

  • 1 month later...

Has she ever won a tourney anywhere ?Are we dropping our standards so that just trying is good enough?Hell if that is the case then let me be the first to throw my hat into the ring "FLAP FOR THE SOLHIEM CUP TEAM"If you haven't seen me in my micofiber shorts Iam a site to see!!

In my new FT carry bag
FT-9 Tour nuetral 9.5
FT-15 degree 3 wood
Fussion Hybrids #2&4
Fussion irons with Grapholoy Pro launch Red shafts56&60 Cally X forged wedges with Red shaftsSG9 putterCally I ballBushnell Meadealist range finder


Let's take a step back to reality for a moment....Michelle hasn't even won on the LPGA tour yet, let alone even make the cut on the mens tour. I don't think this is even worthy of a debate. Sorry Michelle, you good and all, but may I introduce you to my friend, REALITY!!!

In the bag:
Driver: Taylor Made 09' Burner 9.5*
Woods: Nicklaus 18* Hybrid
Cobra DWS Baffler Hybrid 20*
Irons: Mizuno MX-200 4-Gw Project x 5.5Wedge: Cleveland Black Pearl CG14 54* & 58*Putter: Scotty Cameron TEI 3 Newport 2Balls: Prov1x


  • 2 weeks later...
Enough of this stupid teenage girls delusions , as the previous poster said she is incapable of even winning on the LPGA tour . She will never win on the PGA tour she is simply not good enough .............end of

If a team headed by Tiger, Phil, Furyk, Toms and Dimarco can't bring home a win, does anyone think Michelle can help?

These five veterans have won 112 times on various Tours around the world.

She brings 0 to the table.

J.P.

Bridgestone J33 10.5* Fujikura Rombax w
Bridgestone J33 15* Fujikura Zcom tw74
Tour Edge XCG 18* 3 hybrid Mizuno MP30 4-PW DG S300Vokey SM 52 bent 51Vokey Spin Milled 56 & 60Cameron Newport BchBridgestone B330s


I have always been a huge fan of Michelle. I've always felt that if she wanted to test herself against the best, that was her choice. I've always felt that tour players who objected to her "taking a spot" were just whiners who didn't understand what the phrase: "Sponsor's Exemption" meant.

I've changed my mind.

After too many meltdowns and DFL finishes, I think she needs to wait until she's ready. As was already mentioned, she's never even won a single event on the LPGA tour. But, a question jumped into my little head, and I honestly don't know the answer:

Has she ever won one single event playing against adults? Ever? Haven't all of her wins been in junior events? Seriously, I don't know for sure.

It is silly to think that she is going to compete on the PGA tour. I see her relalizing that her future is going going to be dominated the LPGA and she will stick to that.

Note: This thread is 6473 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I agree in general. The one way in which the viewer will notice the pace of play is just that "it's been an hour and Nelly Korda or Scottie Scheffler have only played four holes." Or if for some reason they show a lot of shots of players just standing around when they could be showing golf shots. But I think Andy Johnson said it most recently/best, playing fast is a skill, too. I would love for pro golfers to play faster. You'd see the players you want to see hit more shots in the same time than they do now. So I don't disagree with the pace of play stuff, and hope they can find ways to do it. Heck, the LPGA should leap at the chance to differentiate itself in this way, IMO. So: I stand by what I said in that the TV viewer really doesn't notice much about pace of play. It's rare when they do. I support increasing the pace of play wholeheartedly. But my top five reasons don't include TV ratings or viewership.
    • I don't think the viewer at home can pick up on pace of play, unless the announcers mention something. The telecast has the luxury of bouncing from player to player, which ensures we the viewer always have something to watch.  I think we would notice pace of play if the camera just followed one golfer for an entire round. Or  You were actually golfing behind the slow group Or  The slow group is the last to only group left to finish the tournament.  I like the idea of having a person carrying a digital clock, following each golfer. When the golfer gets to the ball and the group in front of them has cleared they have 60 seconds or they get a penalty stroke. Maybe a second violation is a 2 stroke penalty.  Or as I have said before, every golfer wears a shock collar!!!!! at 1 min 1 second that golfer if going to drop. It will take them a good 30 second to recover, leaving them with another 30 seconds to hit the shot. The course would be littered with golfers just convulsing on fair way from an endless cycle of shocks because they cant seem to hit their ball and keep pace of play. 
    • This isn't the same thing.  This is entirely a time of year thing. Not a trend.  This is the COVID year.  There are many who think the Masters viewership was actually way up. The 2024 ratings being down is only for CBS televisions. It doesn't include anyone (including me) who watched it online. 
    • Ha, I didn't even notice that "NFL competition" part… I just dismissed it on face because pause has very little if any role in TV ratings.
    • Wait a second. That is a bit misleading to drag a 4 year old headline about the ratings when the Masters was delayed during the pandemic. The 2024 ratings were down but not to the extent that this headline would imply. Also, @iacas is correct. Any ratings drop has very little, or perhaps, nothing to do with pace of play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...