Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5381 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
He's

It amazes me that the people that are defending the clones still don't understand the difference between the club pictured above and this:

They both cost the same. They both are the same quality. I don't think a single person on this board would have an issue with someone playing the inexpensive Wilson Prostaff club. So, if the issue people have with clones isn't the cost or the quality , what is it? The issue is the clone is trying to take advantage of the goodwill of another company that the clone has not earned. The clone company is trying to make people think it is "almost" like the high end expensive Ping, when infact it is actually like the inexpensive Wilson Prostaff set found at Wal-Mart. Clone makers are decpetive in their practices. It's not about money, it's about integrity. You don't try and steal another company's goodwill (and for those of you that aren't business savy, the biggest value of most companies is the goodwill built up around the name) by cloning their products.

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...


  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
It amazes me that the people that are defending the clones still don't understand the difference between the club pictured above and this:

That is hogwash. If Ping thought they were being "harmed" or "stolen from" do you think these clone manufacturers would still be in business? They aren't stealing anything from Ping. So if the walmart clubs and the clone clubs are the same price and the same quality, it shouldn't matter.


Posted
  Jtjohns said:
I agree with the word "inexpensive" as well. Funny though, I just got off the phone with a guy that wants to sell his G10s white dots for $250. I was fitted for green dots. Don't know if that will make much of a difference, but I'm thinking about it.

You can send those back to Ping and they will bend them to green dots and repaint the dots for about $30 + shipping.


Posted
It amazes me that the people that are defending the clones still don't understand the difference between the club pictured above and this:

That is completely asinine. The only way this scenario comes into play is companies selling complete counterfits. Fakes that have the same name, same paint job, but are fake. Clubs crooks sell under their coats in back alleys. And I'm sure there is now way anyone is going to think a set of Pong H11's are the exact same thing as G10's.


Posted
  shades9323 said:
That is hogwash. If Ping thought they were being "harmed" or "stolen from" do you think these clone manufacturers would still be in business? They aren't stealing anything from Ping. So if the walmart clubs and the clone clubs are the same price and the same quality, it shouldn't matter.

And you think Ping hasn't tried to stop them? The clone companies stay just this side of trademark infringement. There are a lot of actions that are legal that aren't right. Let me ask you this: if they aren't trying to steal some of Ping's goodwill, why do they make a club that looks like a Ping and label it Pong?

It's all part of the story line where they try to convince you it is almost a good as the real thing. Every part of their sales pitch is an attempt to convice you they just as good as the real thing, just cheaper. That, imho, is a deceptive practice. If they told you the truth--it looks like a Ping, but is Wal-Mart Wilson quality--do you think they would sell nearly as many clubs? I'm not surprised they play fine, so do the Wal-Mart Wilsons. The law of diminishing returns for quality tells you that. Think of quality levels as a staircase, where the height of each step is 1/2 the height of the previous step, but the effort to climb that next (smaller) step is more than all the previous steps combined. It's easy (and cheap) to build a club that is 80% as good as a Ping, but the cost escalate quickly as you go up in quality. I have no doubt clones are 80% as good as the real thing (so are the Wal-Mart Wilsons). What I have a problem with is their implication that they are 90, 95, or 98% as good as the real thing. They aren't, because the effort (and thus cost) to acheive those levels of quality (as small an increase as that may seem to be over 80%) would force them to price their product closer to the level of the real thing.

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...


Posted
And you think Ping hasn't tried to stop them? The clone companies stay just this side of trademark infringement. There are a lot of actions that are legal that aren't right. Let me ask you this: if they aren't trying to steal some of Ping's goodwill, why do they make a club that looks like a Ping and label it Pong?

Actually the biggest defference between a brand name Ping G10, and a cavity back "Wal-Mart" club is the shaft. "Wal-Mart" heads are cast from the same molds at the same factories as Ping and other OEMS, they just slap cheap crappy shafts on them.


Posted
  Jtjohns said:
BTW, how do you like the I15s?

I love them mate, not too hard to hit either so should last me a long time

Guy's, come on JTjohns asked a question and we have answered his question, enough of the clone bashing

:tmade: M2 10.5° - Fujikura Pro 60 - Stiff
:tmade: V-Steel 18° - M.A.S Ultralight- Stiff
:ping: G400 4-UW - AWT 2.0 - Stiff
:tmade: Tour Preferred 58° ATV - KBS Tour-V - Wedge
:scotty_cameron: Select SquareBack - 34" - SuperStroke MS 2.0


Posted
Great arguements caused by............... a broken ferrule!

Driver:  the search continues
Fairway Wood:  Ping G25 3W Tour stiff
Hybrid:  Snake Eyes Q4U 19*, 23*
Irons:  Ping G25 5-UW w/CFS X-flex  (on order)
Wedges:  685BX black 56*      Putter:  Wilson Staff 8882 


Posted
  nuck81 said:
Actually the biggest defference between a brand name Ping G10, and a cavity back "Wal-Mart" club is the shaft. "Wal-Mart" heads are cast from the same molds at the same factories as Ping and other OEMS, they just slap cheap crappy shafts on them.

The biggest difference is the quality control.

The Ping head will be made with a consistent quality of metal. The Wal-Mart heads will be made of whatever metal that is available on the market, that might mean the same as the Pings or it might mean scrap metal from automobiles and refrigerators. A Ping head that is 30 grams too light (due to an air pocket having formed in the casting) will be rejected. A Wal-Mart head that is 30 grams too light will be passed into production. The loft/lie tollerances on a Ping head is probably 1 degree after casting, and the heads are adjusted to the correct loft/lie before shipping. The loft/lie tollerance on a Wal-Mart head is probably at least 3 degrees, and no adjustments are made to correct the loft/lie (this is why on less expensive sets it isn't unusual to have two adjoinging clubs (say the 7 & 8 iron) that have the exact same loft, because the 8 is too strong and the 7 too weak). The bits and blades on the machinery to level the face and cut the grooves on the Pings are changed at specific intervals to maintain a specific quality level. The faces and grooves of the Wal-Mart clubs are probably cut using the "worn out" Ping bits and blades, becuase while they are no longer in good enough condition to use on Pings, they are probably still have plenty of (lower quality) life left in them that is good enough for the Wal-Mart clubs. The list could get pretty long, but the point is to make a cheaper club you have to take quality control short cuts and allow things to pass into the market that would be rejected by a higher quality (and more expensive) clubmaker.

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...


Posted
  gmanuel25 said:
Great arguements caused by............... a broken ferrule!

Exactly my point above.....

I think this thread should be locked now.

:tmade: M2 10.5° - Fujikura Pro 60 - Stiff
:tmade: V-Steel 18° - M.A.S Ultralight- Stiff
:ping: G400 4-UW - AWT 2.0 - Stiff
:tmade: Tour Preferred 58° ATV - KBS Tour-V - Wedge
:scotty_cameron: Select SquareBack - 34" - SuperStroke MS 2.0


Posted
A Ping head that is 30 grams too light (due to an air pocket having formed in the casting) will be rejected.

I'm not sure about golf club manufacutring terminology, but "30 grams" in the regular world is pretty heavy. There's no way that would pass anyone's inspection. BTW - I buy golf balls at Walmart. I wonder if they Top Flites, Titleists, Nikes, and Wilsons they carry are worse than those purchased at the golf shop?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
  Ash1974 said:
I love them mate, not too hard to hit either so should last me a long time

Someone could start a new clone-bashing thread, but why? This one has "clones" right in the title. Great for searching.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
  sean_miller said:
I'm not sure about golf club manufacutring terminology, but "30 grams" in the regular world is pretty heavy. There's no way that would pass anyone's inspection. BTW - I buy golf balls at Walmart. I wonder if they Top Flites, Titleists, Nikes, and Wilsons they carry are worse than those purchased at the golf shop?

Sand wedge heads often weigh over 300 grams. A 10% variance in weight (30 grams) is not unrealistic.

I once purchased some "economy" True Temper iron shafts. Their bottom of the line shaft that went for about $4 each. They were speced at 125 grams. I took them home and weighed them. They varied from 110 to almost 140 grams (a 30 gram variance). Took 'em back. TT is a name manufacturer, but because it was a low end item they saved money by lowering the quality control on that item. That's often why cheap items are cheap--corners are cut on quality control. As far as the golf balls, you are mixing apples and oranges, and we both know it. The Wilson Zip ball sold at Wal-Mart is the exact same Wilson Zip ball sold at Golfsmith. On the other hand, the Wilson Prostaff club line sold at Wal-Mart is different thant the Wilson Staff line sold at Golfsmith. Everyone knows it, everyone recongizes they are different, there is no attempt by anyone to fool people into thinking they are the same quality clubs. And therein lies my problem with clones. They are trying to fool people into thinking their Pong clubs are somehow equivalent to Ping clubs. They aren't. They are a lower quality product.

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...


Posted
The biggest difference is the quality control.

8 out of 10 forum posters don't know what they are talking about.

7/10 facts on internet forums are made up by the poster 5/10 guys don't know the difference between compnent and clone club makers. See I can make up statistics too!! It's fun. You don't really know what goes on in the club making process do you? You;re probably just pissed that you spent $1200 on your clubs and still can;t break 100. Depending on where you buy them from, compnent clubs are just as reliable and just as high quality as OEM. More so if you get them custom fit...

Posted
And therein lies my problem with clones. They are trying to fool people into thinking their Pong clubs are somehow equivalent to Ping clubs. They aren't. They are a lower quality product.

Depends on who and what you buy them from. Some COMPONENT club makers, not clones, make just as high quality stuff as the leading mass produced OEM manufacterers. And they use better shafts as well...


Posted
Sand wedge heads often weigh over 300 grams. A 10% variance in weight (30 grams) is not unrealistic.

Wilson ProStaff actually makes some pretty good stuff - not all of it is great, and the shafts are not the best, but not every top end OEM product ever released was golden either - there are some duds. Every tried Adams hybrids? I demoed 3 different Adams lines yesterday - there was some pretty sketchy stuff there. On some of their shafts, I think the "S" stands for "spaghetti".

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I could be wrong but I believe you get what you pay for. Clones are not the way I prefer to go.

Posted
what a mess of a thread...

I personally like supporting a company/brand. I've never hit a clone so I can't attest for its quality or anything but I agree with others in this thread...in this day and age, with clubs being discounted heavily each year, it's not too difficult to find a nice discontinued brand new OEM set for a decent price. Not to mention a huge selection of used clubs just off craigslist, ebay, any local pro shop.

There is a big controversy regarding Chinese automobile manufacturers ripping off the designs of German cars. Sure theres a different car label and is branded differently so its not completely ripping off the product but I respect the labor and engineering that goes into designing and manufacturing a car...and companies that work to merely copy the design undermines all that.

Its the same with golf clubs. Cloned golf clubs are undermining the work that was put in to creating a unique set of irons that was meticulously engineered and designed by professionals. Sure at the end of the day, they still get paid salary and life moves on, but as someone who respects great engineering, design, and art, I'm against clones and rip offs.

DST Tour 9.5 Diamana Whiteboard
909F3 15* 3 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
909F3 18* 5 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
'09 X-Forged 3-PW Project-X 6.0 Flighted
CG15 56* X-Tour 60* Abaco


Note: This thread is 5381 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • He's going for that carelessly disheveled look but it comes off so manufactured and deliberate. Kind of like Boris Johnson. Tool.
    • Ok but seriously, are they allowed to use their phones for Tiktok or YouTube during the lulls? Rory's round took 5 hrs 51 mins
    • Hole 6, you need to hit a 240 ish slight draw. I decided to flight a hybrid. I made the perfect length backswing, I swung down better, and I kept my arms in front of my chest in the finish with a 3/4 finish.  The ball didn’t get to the tree tops, flighted push draw. I really felt that stretch of the club pulling me up into the finish.  2nd is the next shot, a 70 yard waist to waist distance 52 degree wedge that landed 3 yards short of pin high and one hop stop pin high. Nippy. 😁    
    • Shot a 42. Got to making 1/2 to 3/4 my normal swing. Much better tonight. Should have been a few strokes lower. I blades a pitch shot on hole 1. Didn’t get width. Tried to make a 3/4 swing on a par five, but hit it full swing because my 3/4 is a full swing. A 8 iron went 180 yards and hit the cart path over the green into the lateral hazard. 😳
    • All of these things are possible. Couple of things to bear in mind in particular with regard to Sasho's point about a club flying out of the hands. First of all, even though a driver might have about 100lbs of force on the hands at impact at 110mph or whatever it is, most people have two hands on the club at that point (Vijay excepted, but I'm guessing his front hand was strong enough to hang on on its own), so 50 lbs per hand would be sufficient to hang on to that. Second, grips are also tapered, which helps quite a bit and they're sticky, which also helps. It seems unlikely that grip strength limits clubhead speed because the club might come flying out of your hands, but it's possible that your brain is holding you back because it knows (or thinks) it'll be uncomfortable. I would note that on occasion, I have hit drivers well off the toe or heel and the club twists in my hands as a result. That's unpleasant and I obviously try to avoid that. Subconsciously, perhaps my mind is thinking I might do that with a faster swing, so it limits my speed somewhat.  In short, while there are high schoolers with 120 mph club head speed, I think that's quite a ways from the norm and if their grip was stronger, perhaps they'd be at 125 mph. I don't think high grip strength generates speed. If there is something there, it is much more likely that low grip strength saps speed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...