Jump to content
IGNORED

Whatta Bunch Of Crap!


Baynative
Note: This thread is 6449 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

again, where did someone say he cant back away?

youre looking for things and problems with the rule that simply arent there.

you can back away, you can leave the bunker, change clubs.

the issue here is that he took practice swings (therefore he was allowed to dig his feet into the suface of the bunker) and then moved closer to the ball and did it again.

thats the violation. you simply cant do that. inches or feet.

and yes that could make a difference, especially depending on the type of bunker.

cheers

bridgestone j33r 460 V2 75 Stiff
HiBore Fairway 15 V2 75 Stiff
hybrid HiBore19 S300
bridgestone j33b 3-PW S300
Vokey 52 GP Vokey 58 LWyes sophia Putter 33Titleist v1x - bridgestone B330Home Course: Bethpage

Link to comment
Share on other sites


being able to dig in your feet at various points around the ball is one way of seeing if there are any diviations in consistency throughout the bunker that a player can try.

I don't believe he dug his feet in in any way, shape, or form before addressing the ball. I think he just stood in the bunker and took a couple practice swings. I could be wrong, but I watched it and didn't remember him digging in.

I agree that the player shouldn't be allowed to dig in and get a feel that way. But I don't see how standing in the bunker (not digging in) and taking a couple practice swings would help.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

interesting indeed.

can any one post a clip of it?

its so hard to tell sometimes on TV what has actually happened.

reminds me of when jeff maggart hit himself coming out of a bunker in the final round of the 2003 masters.

judging by the TV visuals, it seemed like nothing out of the ordinary had happened (even on the replay). it wasnt until he called the penalty on himself that it became apparent what had transpired.

Cheers

bridgestone j33r 460 V2 75 Stiff
HiBore Fairway 15 V2 75 Stiff
hybrid HiBore19 S300
bridgestone j33b 3-PW S300
Vokey 52 GP Vokey 58 LWyes sophia Putter 33Titleist v1x - bridgestone B330Home Course: Bethpage

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Having reviewed the discussion (not just here, but in every news outlet I could find in 10 minutes), it seems Byrd was penalized for breaking rule 13-4, which talks about testing the conditions of the hazard prior to taking his stance.

Ok so whats the intent of this? Does taking a practice swing other than where your ball is somehow give you an idea of how to hit it better? Is this like something to prevent people from figureing out that their foot my accidentally slip in the sand, and therefore give them an advantage? I don't exactly know the history of the rule, so it just sounds like nit-pickyness to me. Then again i don't seek ways to cheat, so I probably wouldn't think of the advantage this gives you right quick anyways.

I'm terrible, but i have fun.

In the Bag:
Taylormade r580XD 10.5° Reg flex
3 + 5 wood - Dunlop graphite shaft parts from a set3-pw - Dunlop set that looks sorta like ping I3's (i'm sorely in need of an upgrade.)LW/SW/GW - Adams black 52, 56, 60 degree wedges.Putter - Ping Karsten Anser 34"Bac...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It was a clear rules violation, and Jonathan Byrd should have known about it....

Great point Cody. Scrolling through all the posts and finally a statement I was waiting for

I can tell you - after all the Wie-haters jumping on the "that stupid teenager should read some rules, she'd know better than touch the moss on the backswing in the bunker" bandwagon... I can't wipe a smile off my face. Where are you all now? Byrd is ok, because he didn't say "rulebook is a boring read"? Here you have a guy who's been on the circuits for years, yet nobody is all over his butt. Does it mean they COULD not know the rules and not being stoned to death for it? Amazing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ok so whats the intent of this? Does taking a practice swing other than where your ball is somehow give you an idea of how to hit it better?

i would image the reasoning is that once youre taking a practice swing, youre in effect getting a sense of the firmess of the sand in an area of the bunker other than where your ball is (even if you havent dug your feet in), since youre shifting your weight while in a stable position (as opposed to walking)

personally id see that as an advantage to be honest.

bridgestone j33r 460 V2 75 Stiff
HiBore Fairway 15 V2 75 Stiff
hybrid HiBore19 S300
bridgestone j33b 3-PW S300
Vokey 52 GP Vokey 58 LWyes sophia Putter 33Titleist v1x - bridgestone B330Home Course: Bethpage

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The only conclusion I have come to while reading this topic is the fact I need to re-read the rules of golf in its entirety. I'm not sure how many penalty strokes I've incurred this year by simply not paying attention to the situation. I have probably taken a practice swing while standing in a bunker before, although I can't pinpoint any specific case.

I just need to read the rules again. I definitely don't know all of them.

It might be a long and tough Newport Cup for me this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
I think I heard of an incident a couple of years back when a TV viewer called in an infraction he noticed and got someone disqualified. I don't like this junk. Golf is a sport of honor and professionals as well as devoted recreational players will uphold the rules and traditions on their own. It should not become an interactive media exercise.

My opinion is that a rules infraction is a rules infraction. I don't care who reports it. I don't even have a problem with fans calling in - if an actual rule is broken. I did have a problem with Bamberger waiting for so long - but wouldn't have had a problem if he had brought the issue up right then or even before she was done with her round.

If you break the rules, you've broken the rules. The proper penalty needs to be given. Yes, that means guys on TV are more likely to be penalized by someone watching on TV, but by the same token, what does it change if someone who's five strokes over the cut line on the 17th hole on Friday breaks a rule. Nothing changes (and he's likely not on TV). A rule was broken. Clearly he didn't have the knowledge to call it on himself. Ignorance has never been a good enough excuse to get away with breaking rules. You let it slide for one guy and soon all sorts of people are gonna be saying "I didn't know!"
I've replayed his violation several times. If that is a violation of the intended rule so is walking on the sand or wiggling your feet to secure a solid stance. This was clearly a very bad call.

There's a difference between what he did and walking to your ball.

far from silly, in my opinion anyways.

Ditto. The rules are written the way they are because of certain situations. Testing the condition of a hazard is against the rules for a reason.

This goes hand in hand with someone taking multiple practice swings over their ball when in a fescue-like type lie, in order to try and clear away a better path for their club to hit the ball cleanly.

Among other things, yep. There are lots of ways to push the rules, and many of the rules themselves are not absolute or somewhat of a grey area. Byrd should avoid the grey areas more often. It cost him this time.

As I said before, there's a reason guys take their practice strokes in their address position over the ball or outside the bunker entirely.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6449 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Yeah.  As far as remaining still, I was thinking body rotates around the spine like an axis.  Instead of pivoting, some like me, sway, come off that axis, leave weight on back foot, etc.  
    • I apologize on behalf of… idiot men. Sorry about that. Next time, tell the guy to shut up. 😛  Day 553, May 8, 2024 18 holes from the whites with @rwolfe. Windy AF today, but hit some good shots. Slid back a little from where I was the previous two days, but… I can get it back. Made a pretty nifty birdie on 12 from some pretty odd places. 😄 
    • The angles look fine. Get as much light as you can on the area — you want the highest shutter speed you can get. Less blur.
    • Snap @ Tour Spoon! Birdied 11 yesterday. Hit a poor iron ,stopped on edge of bunker , pitch with my lob wedge landed about 6’ away and went in. Only 12 & 14 to go, long par5’s into the prevailing wind. Might be waiting a while although I did have about 15’ on 12 after the birdie on 11, didn’t miss by much.
    • Tested the Maxfli TourS yesterday. Compared to my former ball, the Titleist AVX, I got an extra 10 yards off the driver and half a club (5-7 yards) off the irons. The combined extra yardage from the driver and fairway wood meant that on par-5s where I usually hit an 8-iron third shot, I hit a PW. It's just a smidgen softer than the AVX and seems to spin well. Some of the reviews indicated a low ball flight, but I did not notice it. I also did not observe any problems with the paint quality, which was an issue with previous Maxfli models up to and including the U series.  My previous round I tested the Bridgestone E6, a two-piece ball with a different cover. It was OK; the same distance and feel as the AVX but with less spin. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...