Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5681 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
+1 on the AP1

Again, another very useful advice. The salesperson offered me $580 for the used AP1. If it was a better deal, I may have chose to "tolerate" (sorry for the owners) the look and have bought it.

I know nothing about the tech so I can only choose brand. And I am little biased to mizuno as I am a judoka. Mizuno makes very nice judogi, making me trust that mizuno is quality brand. I dislike Nike and Adidas because they are not brands focusing in golf. And I dislike Callaway and PING, dunno why

finding my lifelong sportssss


  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
have another question again

is it ok for beginner to use "lie angle up 2 deg"? what is lie angle actually? tks

finding my lifelong sportssss


Posted
I dislike Nike and Adidas because they are not brands focusing in golf. And I dislike Callaway and PING, dunno why

There's your first mistake. All brands, at this point, are more or less equal. In fact, most people here would say Mizuno's woods are inferior to the brands you listed as disliking. Mizuno and Titleist are also not "golf focused brands." Indeed, they both make other products. Titleist is owned by Fortune Brands, which is the company that makes Moen plumbing fixtures and Jim Beam Bourbon. Indeed, Callaway and Adams are the only two true "golf" companies out there anymore. Cobra is owned by Puma, who primarilly makes sportswear. Ping is owned by Karsten, who also makes parts of jets and medical tools. Nike and Addidas are sportswear brands, of course, just like Mizuno.

To say any of these companies clubs are worse than another is a lie. In fact, the two companies you mentioned are the two companies who are the least aimed at making clubs for beginners. Mizuno and Titleist are primarilly interested in the low handicap market. What you need are clubs that will forgive you and help you learn the game, not ones that suit your own biases. I never thought I would own Nike clubs, but they make a good product, and their clubs were the best for me. That's why I got them.
have another question again

Lie angle should match you. You need to hit balls off of a lie board to determine what lie angle is right for you. I am 2-3° up depending on brand, so 2 up would fit me, but not other people who may need 2° flat, or maybe just standard. It's like asking if size 36 pants are right for you, without any idea how large you are. They could be too big, they could be too small.


Posted
what I think gives Titleist a upper hand in alot of their irons and wedges is who is developing them. I think they have alot of famous designers who design the clubs. Vokey wedges for example, and I think the guy who created the ap2 irons and their other irons is pretty famous too.

Posted
what I think gives Titleist a upper hand in alot of their irons and wedges is who is developing them. I think they have alot of famous designers who design the clubs. Vokey wedges for example, and I think the guy who created the ap2 irons and their other irons is pretty famous too.

Who cares - no really, who? Does the fact Roger Cleveland (think 588) designs wedges for Callaway sway you to their brand? It should, but I bet it doesn't. There are some really famous (in their field) guys making wedges for Nike and Mizuno, but since they don't put their name on the clubhead like Bob Vokey, somehow they're inferior? Like Shanks, I would have never considered a swoosh branded club a few years ago (their first foray into hockey was laughable - then they bought Bauer and ta da!) but they have really good people on staff and they, I hate to say it, make some really really good stuff.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Lie angle should match you. You need to hit balls off of a lie board to determine what lie angle is right for you. I am 2-3° up depending on brand, so 2 up would fit me, but not other people who may need 2° flat, or maybe just standard. It's like asking if size 36 pants are right for you, without any idea how large you are. They could be too big, they could be too small.

so, i should go to normal lie without angle?

btw, is mx300 or mx1000 more forgiving? is one of them give more "feel"? more complicated and fun to play with?

finding my lifelong sportssss


Posted
so, i should go to normal lie without angle?

As he just said, you need to be fitted. You should only be taking two pieces of advice from all of this...

-Get fitted. -Try as many different sets as you can, because believe it or not, even a beginner can feel a difference.

Posted
so, i should go to normal lie without angle?

First, answer me this. What size shoes should I wear? The answer is equally impossible without knowing how big my feet are. You can buy clubs that are standard lie, and have them bent, which is likely your best option.

btw, is mx300 or mx1000 more forgiving? is one of them give more "feel"? more complicated and fun to play with?

The MX-1000 is easier to hit, but I'd probably say get the 300. The MX-300 is a little higher end, and it's forged, so it can be adjusted to fit you better. Personally, the MX-300 will stay with you longer while still being easy to hit. In fact, I would even consider playing them if someone gave me a set, they're nice clubs.


Posted
thanks.

but still not 100% sure for the lie. may i should ask the shop to give me different angle lie to try if available.

Thanks again all, I think i will get the MX300

finding my lifelong sportssss


Posted
Who cares - no really, who? Does the fact Roger Cleveland (think 588) designs wedges for Callaway sway you to their brand? It should, but I bet it doesn't. There are some really famous (in their field) guys making wedges for Nike and Mizuno, but since they don't put their name on the clubhead like Bob Vokey, somehow they're inferior? Like Shanks, I would have never considered a swoosh branded club a few years ago (their first foray into hockey was laughable - then they bought Bauer and ta da!) but they have really good people on staff and they, I hate to say it, make some really really good stuff.

Yea thats true, I dont really pay attention to who designed it, although it definitly helps knowing that a great golf designer created it. I really pay attention to the workmanship that went into the club/how it was made and the performance of it.


Posted
thanks.

definitly dont make your decision based off what people are telling you in a forum only. You need to hit some irons and pick the ones you like the best. The forum advice aids in this process.

btw. If you are only looking for game improvement, I would DEFINITLY try some Ping irons out if I were you. IMO best game improvement irons on the market.

Posted
whats with all this advice for getting fitted lol...

i know some of you are gonna shit your pants when i say this (i'm looking at you Shanks) but what difference is it gonna make? this guys been to the range once...fitted clubs arent gonna do shit for him at this point but now youre just confusing him.

benchan1 - just buy a set and take lessons. when you start understanding the fundamentals and basic mechanics, you'll understand how to determine this whole lie/loft deal and at that point, when you're comfortable with a swing, you can opt for getting your irons fitted but don't get confused with this lie stuff at this point. Learn to golf first and then worry about the little details.

DST Tour 9.5 Diamana Whiteboard
909F3 15* 3 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
909F3 18* 5 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
'09 X-Forged 3-PW Project-X 6.0 Flighted
CG15 56* X-Tour 60* Abaco


Posted
whats with all this advice for getting fitted lol...

true.... on my hands, every irons look and feel the same except the look and weight and materials. Will go for a normal lie MX 300

Definitely will stay in this forum for getting more swing advice : ) useful stuff

finding my lifelong sportssss


Posted
true.... on my hands, every irons look and feel the same except the look and weight and materials. Will go for a normal lie MX 300

yea don't make it harder on yourself. no offence to the other guys who are giving you advice, they're all sound advice but don't get so caught up in all this technical crap us golf junkies talk about. half the time, we're arguing semantics and bullshitting around about crap that doesn't matter.

DST Tour 9.5 Diamana Whiteboard
909F3 15* 3 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
909F3 18* 5 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
'09 X-Forged 3-PW Project-X 6.0 Flighted
CG15 56* X-Tour 60* Abaco


Posted
yea don't make it harder on yourself. no offence to the other guys who are giving you advice, they're all sound advice but don't get so caught up in all this technical crap us golf junkies talk about. half the time, we're arguing semantics and bullshitting around about crap that doesn't matter.

Yeah, but your dead wrong. I'm guessing you're within 2° of standard lie to say that. I struggled to break 100 for 20 years. I couldn't figure out why I just couldn't get anywhere in this game. Then I discovered my irons were nearly 4° too flat for me. To make solid contact, I had to catch the thing perfectly, right in the toe where it contacted the ground, but almost never got it purely.

I'm going to say this again, would you tell a person who's never walked before to get any size shoe, and maybe get fit later? Hell no, you'd get laughed at. Why golfers are so lax on getting fit, I'll never know, but if they want to struggle to break 100, that's their thing. When you buy clubs from a shop, they will usually bend them to your lie angle for free. Do it, there's nothing to lose.

Posted
true.... on my hands, every irons look and feel the same except the look and weight and materials. Will go for a normal lie MX 300

LOL - Sticking with the Mizuno's!!!

Fair enough. I went through the exercise of buying new irons a few months ago. Though I've been playing for 15 years, I was never an equipment junkie - but I wanted to get good clubs. When I started looking a friend gave me some advice - He said - You'll read all the reviews you can, ask questions on forums, hit a ton of clubs and consider all the options. In the end you'll buy the club that you think looks the best. He was right! Nobody can play good golf with a club they think looks crap.

A) You need to hit alot of different clubs.
B) Whatever works for you.
C) It's the indian, not the arrow.
D) A 5 wood, 19* hybrid or a lob wedge.


Posted
went shopping today again.

found the AP1 in good deal. the MP 52/58 are both cheaper than the MX300 (around $250 difference). Very strange, the MP series should be of higher end.

the salesperson roughly measure for me, I can just go for normal lie.

he also recommended me to go for MP58. he said MP58 is also quite forgiving because of the small cavity. he knows i am beginner but still said if i buy the MP58, I can stick with it for many many years..

finding my lifelong sportssss


Posted
Would highly recommend a custom fitting session rather than off the rack to give yourself the best possible start; its amazing the difference a properly fitted set of clubs will make even if you can't necessarily tell in what way at the begining.

Don't know if they have anywhere in Singapore with it yet, but ask about the SwingDNA if you're going with Mizuno. This tool suggests the best shaft for you based on just 3 swings. Shafts are probably more important in the heads so you want to get that right.
Whats in my Twister V bag?
MP-630 fast-track 9.5 w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Fubuki S
909F3 15* w/ Titleist Aldila Voodoo FWS
909F3 18* w/ Titleist Aldila Voodoo FWS
MP-58 3-PW w/ Project X 6.0 MP T-10 Black Satin 52/07, 56/12 & 60/08 Newport 2.5 MS 34" B330-S balls

Note: This thread is 5681 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.