Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6873 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just how much does weight affect distance. I actually seem to hit irons with heavier weight shafts like dynamic gold farther, should I consider heavier weight graphite shafts for my hybrids and woods? Maybe that is why I hit my old 7wd so well? Starting to look for new irons and want to make sure I understand the trade offs when I get fitted. I am particularly interested in rifle and rifle flighted shafts for irons and aldila NVS in irons and woods? My friends think that the rifles with a forged cavity back would be soft enough that I could go back to steel in my irons (chronic tendinitis). I am getting longer at almost 51 to my suprise. I have gone from a 100 yard carry with my 9 iron to about 115, 125 to 140 with a 7, 5 iron 160.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


  • Administrator
Posted
  allin said:
Just how much does weight affect distance. I actually seem to hit irons with heavier weight shafts like dynamic gold farther, should I consider heavier weight graphite shafts for my hybrids and woods? Maybe that is why I hit my old 7wd so well? Starting to look for new irons and want to make sure I understand the trade offs when I get fitted. I am particularly interested in rifle and rifle flighted shafts for irons and aldila NVS in irons and woods? My friends think that the rifles with a forged cavity back would be soft enough that I could go back to steel in my irons (chronic tendinitis). I am getting longer at almost 51 to my suprise. I have gone from a 100 yard carry with my 9 iron to about 115, 125 to 140 with a 7, 5 iron 160.

When I was observing some fittings for an article (back when the 735.CM was coming out), I tried the lighter weight shaft. I hit the ball a little farther on sweet-spot hits, but overall, averaged less distance because my contact was all over the face. My swing (or whatever) was better with a heavier shaft. I could feel the head more and the heavier weight helped "smooth out" some small little bumps or hiccups in my swing (I guess). My contact was all over the face with the lighter weight steel shaft, but almost all dead center with the DG S300.

The Rifles do feel a bit softer than the DGs, but I don't know that they'll feel like graphite for you.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think lighter graphite shafts should increase your swing speed and give you more distance which they do for most everyone. Why doesn't everyone use them in their irons, then? Because the distance comes at a cost of accuracy in distance and dispersion. Most folks would rather hit their irons an certain direction and distance and add another club if needed. A nine iron should be fairly precise. For players who need distance across the board, graphite makes a lot sense.

Note: This thread is 6873 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Just didn't think the focus wouldn't be anything about my arms/hands. 
    • Wordle 1,499 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Birdied #7 and #17 at the home course today. #7 is new, #17 is not.
    • Wordle 1,499 5/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • In the old days, pre-2020, "playing to your handicap" meant a net score about equal to the Course Rating.  that led to problems when people played against each other from different tees, people playing tees with a lower CR would generally shoot lower scores.  Course Handicaps were adjusted for each competition to make it even, usually lowering the course handicap for the "forward tee" players. So now if you "play to your handicap", the (68.4-72) term means your score will be even par, no matter which tees you play from.  No adjustment needed for people playing from different tees.  Look at your example, the guy shoots 82 every time, his Course Handicap of 10 gives him an even par net score every time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...