Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5632 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
So now that I can afford a hobby like golf I am trying to start playing a lot more then the couple times a year with my dad I have done in the past. I want to start improving my gear. I started with:

Driver/Woods : Yamaha Kevlar Composite Driver/Wood set. I can't find any information at all on these. I actually kind of like them. The heads are small, the driver looks like a 3 wood. And they are just really weird, they make a crack like a wooden baseball bat. I am awful with consistency of the drivers though. I can't hit my Dads new Taylormade Burner 09 much better.

Irons : Northwestern "Chi Chi Rodriguez" Iron Set. I did some googling and found a similar set being sold on Ebay as Vintage clubs. The irons are blades, and actually came with wooden woods that are now sitting in the attic.

Wedge : Hand me down sand wedge, not sure the make it might have come with the iron set.

Putter : Random thing, not too old though so it's not like I am hitting with a mini golf putter.

I replaced the irons with some Nike VR Full Cavity (4-AW) clubs that I got for what I think was a great price. I know they aren't super game improvement clubs which are probably better suited for me, but they are a big step up from what I had. I hit some at the driving range today and the difference is astounding. The ball goes much straighter and maybe a little further but I don't care much about distance as long as it goes straight!

I am very pleased with the irons so far after only one range outing. I can't afford to get new clubs all at once, and I also want to make sure I stick with my goal of playing more often before buying something else. What club should I be looking at upgrading next? Is a 3 wood a good choice, would that help me get more control over my drives? Or would a wedge/putter help my short game and be a better choice?


P.S.

How should I clean the astro turf marks on the bottom of my clubs from the range? Now that I don't have crappy clubs I want to keep them looking nice :)

Posted
A forgiving driver would probably help a lot. You can pick up a good used driver for under $100. I personally still find it hard to keep a good mental state of mind if I have a bad drive off the tee.

For cleaning your clubs, I always have a wet towel anytime I play or practice. Just use some pressure and they will come off in several passes.
taylormade.gif - R9 SuperTri TP 8.5˚ Driver
taylormade.gif - R9 TP 15˚ 19˚ Fairway Woods
nike.gif - VR Split Cavity 2-PW Irons
nike.gif - VR Black 52° 56° Wedges
cameron.gif - Newport 2 34" Putter

Posted
Depends on what your weakness is. Do any of your clubs feel unnatural to hold? Personally, I'd build from the bottom (and I did when I recently re-built my set). I started with wedges because having comfortable wedges of the appropriate lofts is a life-saver. As a high-handicapper, we lose a lot of strokes getting onto the green. If you can get on consistently and within easy 2-putt distance every time with the occasional 1-putt distance, you'll do better. If I had to re-build my set again, I'd start with wedges again. I started with nothing over a PW though, so I was desperate.

You did say that your consistency is off with your driver. Finding fairways is also important, so weigh it against your wedge play, which you didn't mention much about.

Since the putter is so personal and the difference between no toe hang and full toe hang is so noticeable, I wouldn't go out to get a putter. Try lots of putters and get one once and only once you stumble across one you love. Don't give yourself a deadline and say "I have to go get a putter today".

[edit]
For cleaning, water and a towel should work fine. If you really soil them up while playing, soak them for 5 minutes and then use your dedicated cleaning towel to scrub and dry them off.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
Best next .... lessons !

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter


Note: This thread is 5632 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.