Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5961 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Are forged game improvement irons as forgiving as cast iron game improvement irons? I play the Rac OS 2 but am considering the Mizuno MX 25. Just wanted some input.

Thanks.

Posted
I switched from RAC OS (don't know the number) to Mizuno MX 23's. I can't say that one is more forgiving than the other. My major reason was the feel of the forged irons. I liked the way that it felt when I hit the ball, and I got more feedback on where I hit it. I also found that I swung differently. With the Taylormades I used my hands and arms way too much. With the Mizunos I used more big muscles. Can't say why, but there is a very different feel to the two irons. I would make sure to hit the Mizunos on turf (a bucket or so) to see if they suit you. I literally was sore for the first few weeks of adapting to the Mizunos, but now I swear by them.

Robert Reid

In the bag:

Driver Cobra M/F Speed3 Cleveland LauncherCleveland Halo 2i Nike CPR 23 degree5-PW Mizuno MX 23 (graphite shafts)56 degree SW Mizuno MT


Posted
Overall cast GI irons will be more forgiving that Forged GI irons because of the weight that the discretionary weight that the designer can use in the design process. With a Cast Iron there will be much more weight to distribute at the sole and around the perimiter. With that said, I'm currently playing the Wishon 560MC's (Forged GI) and can't believe how many times I've thinned a shot and ended up right in front of the green. They're certainly more forgiving than some of the Cast GI irons I have played. But as a whole, cast would probably win the battle.

  • 2 years later...
Posted
This is an old thread, but with all the questions about forged irons lately (and my own interest in them) I figured I'd bump it to the top.

It would seem to me that some of the more forgiving forged blades would include the MX200, MX950, and MP52 from Mizuno, but beyond that, what forged irons from the last few years would be appropriate for a mid-handicapper and up?

On the flipside, what are some forgiving cast irons that have the buttery feel and excellent sound of a forged iron? Is there such a thing?

In the blue Colts bag:

Driver - FT-5 10°
Hybrids - 4DX 15.5°, 20°
Irons/Wedges - CI-7 4-GW, SW | "Free" Warrior 60° LWPutter - TiffanyBalls - various


  • Administrator
Posted
On the flipside, what are some forgiving cast irons that have the buttery feel and excellent sound of a forged iron? Is there such a thing?

The AP1s are pretty high up there. Less so the current models, MUCH more so the ones coming out in a month or so.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
http://golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_p...23_A_cn_E_2089

http://golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_p...53_A_cn_E_2089

http://golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_p...62_A_cn_E_2089

http://golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_p...63_A_cn_E_2089

http://golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_p...65_A_cn_E_2089

I use the MTF model and will never use any other iron. Minimal offset, forged feel and cavity back weighting. You can also have them build you a complete set for about 1/3 of a Mizuno set.

Glock 17


Posted
I've hit the mx-200 and mp-52 on mizuno demo day and they are both at least equally as forgiving as my rac OS2's. The mx-200 had a somewhat better feel and equal forgiveness while the mp-52 had the great forged feel while still having a reasonable amount of forgiveness for a mid-high handicap like me.

Posted
I think the new mx 300 look great but they don't come in wrong handed. I am considering going to a GI iron because iron play is my weakest part of my game.

I think a good option also is the callaway x20 or 22 tours.

I really don't believe forged irons feel much better. A pured shot with a cast iron feels pretty darn nice. I hit a couple pure with my irons last night that felt incrediable. There is some research out there that concluded you can't tell the differenence.

Brian


Posted
If you want a really nice, forged, cavity back club with a good amount of forgivness take a look at the Adams A4 irons. They set up nicely at address and have a good amount of forgiveness. It is a progressive set, meaning the higher the club, the less offset, allowing you to shape shots rather easily with your scoring irons.

I would also look at the Taylormade 2009 Forged Cavity Backs, look almost identical to the 2005 series.

You might also take a look at the new Nike irons. If you're going the route of starting your set with a 3I, you might want to have a combo series:

3I and 4I in the full cavity, 5I through 7I in the split cavity and 8I-PW in the blade.

Best of luck in your search.

Titleist 905T Accra SC75 M4 Shaft

Nike SQ 4W Accra T70 M4 Shaft
HB001 17* Hybrid with Mitsubishi Diamana Thump X Stiff Flex
Baffler Pro 20* Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Taylor Made 24* Burner Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Mizuno MP-32 5-PW Black Oxide Finish Project X 6.0 Shafts

Vokey 52* Oil Can Finish TTDG S400 Shaft

Cleveland 588 60* TTDG S400 Shaft

Rife Bimini Blade Putter

 

Ball-White and Round

 


Posted
As far as forged sticks go, I really like the MX-200 irons that a buddy recently bought. They feel awesome and still allow some workability.

Another sweet stick is the Bridgestone Pocket Cavity.....butter and forgiveness. That is "the" club that I wanted when I bought new irons in April....Bridgestone couldn't fit my specs (through the program I was buying them under).

I'm very happy with what I wound up with.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
[url]

I second this recommendation. Great forged sticks for a very reasonable price.

Launcher 2009 10.5º, S
Rescue Dual 16º
Rescue Dual 19º
Maltby MTF 4-pw, Rifle 5.5
Maltby M-Series 52.6, 58.8 2008 AnserOut of the bag: Big Bertha Fusion 15º, YS6+ R (for sale or trade)


Posted

I have had the MP 62's for about 8 months and like them. I went to the store yesterday and hit the 09 burner irons and really liked them too. I have had some issues with my swing lately and tried blaming it on my irons so I thought "that's it I need more forgiving irons". After the lady at the golf store showed me what I was doing wrong I was hitting the Burners flush into the net and they felt really nice. Then I went home and was hitting balls at the range behind my house with the MP 62's. It was like the movie Kill Bill when they were all obsessed with the Hitori Honzo Sword. There are plenty of clubs out there but only one mizuno.IMO there isn't a better feeling in golf then hitting the sweet spot on a Forged Mizuno!


Posted
For what its worth, my ballstriking skills probably border on GI/player cavities, and I've had tremendous success with the MP-57s. They're forgiving and provide tons of feedback. I debabted over the MP-67s when I got mine and I'm glad I settled on the more forgiving of the two sets. For those considering the transition from GIs or looking for forgiving intermediate clubs: don't overlook the MP series.
Driver: Taylormade Tour Burner 9.5° | Fairway Wood: Adams Speedline Fast 10 15° | Irons: Mizuno MP-57 3-PW | Wedges: Cleveland CG11 52° 56° 60° | Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG Rossie

Posted
tn2e, I think I am close to you and I had that dilemma recently. In short I tried many clubs, went through reasonable custom fitting and bought MX-25 at the end.
Well I tried many irons and most of all like MP-52, AP-2 and MX-200.
I had NO problem with ball flight or whatever with the mentioned ones. I do not think you will have either (ever less than me?). Where I want to point your focus is the shaft. Be aware that MX-25 stiff (my choice) produce higher flight than MX-200 standard shaft in reg. So basically if your usual ball flight is high go for MX-200 (if you are close to them) and if your ball flight is relatively lower one go for MX-25. There is not big difference between them in heads and with MX-25 you can save some $.
Also if you need a standard club length clubs – buy MX-25 ; if not buy other because you will not find longer or shorter MX-25. Lie/loft are not a problem to adjust (a bit).
Also I found 4 ir so easier to hit than my previous TA5 from Cleveland (where I kept same in the garage) that I am sorry I did not buy the 3 ir. This is one more point to show you that this kind of irons are Ok for you....

Posted
I think the new mx 300 look great but they don't come in wrong handed. I am considering going to a GI iron because iron play is my weakest part of my game.

Yeah I was bored and hit the MX300 I was really impressed, great looks and performance was top notch I would have to get them bent 1-2 degrees stronger though,

Aerolite III bag
MP600 10.5*
F-50 15*
MP57's Project X 5.5 3-PW
CG10 56* RAC 52* 60* 2 Ball putter ProV1/ProV1X Blackberry Storm GolfLogix


Posted
You may want to check out the Srixon i701 forged irons. They are blowing them out now and can be found for as little as $300 with Dynamic Gold shafts. They seem very comparable to the MX-200 regarding size and sole, etc.

Dymo2 str8-Fit 10.5 driver & Dymo2 3 wood
#3 & #4 Machspeed Hybrids
5-PW i701 irons
52 & 58 XFT Wedges
White Ice 2-Ball CS Putter One Vapor Sidekick push cartSonocaddie Auto Play GPS


Posted
You may want to check out the Srixon i701 forged irons. They are blowing them out now and can be found for as little as $300 with Dynamic Gold shafts. They seem very comparable to the MX-200 regarding size and sole, etc.

Where? A quick web search shows them for sale at about $800 at several online stores.

In the blue Colts bag:

Driver - FT-5 10°
Hybrids - 4DX 15.5°, 20°
Irons/Wedges - CI-7 4-GW, SW | "Free" Warrior 60° LWPutter - TiffanyBalls - various


Posted
Edwin Watts should have them for $350 (4-PW) and there are some on eBay for $300 from reputable sellers.

Dymo2 str8-Fit 10.5 driver & Dymo2 3 wood
#3 & #4 Machspeed Hybrids
5-PW i701 irons
52 & 58 XFT Wedges
White Ice 2-Ball CS Putter One Vapor Sidekick push cartSonocaddie Auto Play GPS


Note: This thread is 5961 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.