Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Weakened Lofts & Less Offset to help hit it farther and straighter?


Note: This thread is 5460 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Club Speed Attack Angle Dynamic Loft Ball Speed Smash Spin Carry Side Spin (yds) Landing Angle
Tour Burner 105S 92.5 -8.4 14.3 127.4 1.38 5544 180.5 4.5 Left 35.3
Epon 6.5 PX 91 -7.7 14.7 128.4 1.41 5097 187.3 5 Left 37.2
Epon 6.0 PX 92.1 -7.4 16.3 128 1.39 5411 186.5 2.2 Right 39.5
MP53 6.5 Rifle 92 -7.4 16.6 126.4 1.37 5473 183.6 4.4 Right 40.1
MP53 KBS X 89 -7.5 16.6 125.4 1.4 5658 180.1 5.9 Right 38.8

I had a shaft fitting last night at Midwest Golf Lab here in St. Louis and contrary to my first experience with them, this was great.  John worked with me for about 2 hours and even offered to do the fitting for free as there were some communication errors the first time I came in.

Here are some numbers from the fitting showing me with my stock Tour Burner irons and a few others with PX 6.5, PX 6.0, Rifle 6.5, KBS Stiff, KBS X.

One thing John mentioned is that he would like to bend my clubs 2 degrees weaker (PW from 46 to 48) and this would give me more distance.  The idea was I de-loft the club too much which does not hit the ball high enough to get the optimal distance.  Additionally he told me that if I switched irons I should look for something with less offset and it would help me to keep from blocking the ball.  The reason being, I hold off my finish for a long time and the offset would just aid in blocking the ball.

Anyone disagree with that?


Posted

Not buying it.  You may prefer weaker lofts, but I don't think it's because de-lofting is costing you distance.  And I don't buy that the tiny measurable difference between offset and less offset is causing you to block your shots.


Posted

nope...John is on crack dude

agreed from what max said above

think about this

when you properly lag the club and hit down on the ball, you are delofting the club

proper lag creates more spin and more distance...not less

flipping causes a loss of distance and inconsistency

less offset has nothing to do with you blocking the ball - that is all in your set up and swing

holding your finish longer, well...you have already made contact with the ball...hold it as long as you want, but your mistake has already been made

bending your irons weaker (all of them) will also wreak havoc on the bounce on your irons

you will be creating MORE bounce on every iron.....the last thing you need is more bounce on a 5 or 6iron

if your itchy to buy new irons or shafts then get at er

but the issues your dealing with are swing related....not iron related

based on whats in your bag and the flexes you were trying, it looks like your going for a much stiffer shaft as well???? (Rifle & PJX 6.5's?)

not sure what club you were hitting, but it i had to guess it looks like a 5 or 6i??

"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted

Not looking for anything stiffer, it's what he put in my hand.  I like hitting heavier clubs (from what I've tested) as they are easier to swing.  With the lighter clubs I tend to swing out of control too much.

I was hitting a 6 iron.

The idea of hitting the ball higher does make sense to add distance however the offset idea confused me.  I agree there are optimal shot heights/launch angles/landing angles.  If you can see my angle of attack, it is too steep which would aid in de-lofting the club.  His theory was, yes I need to shallow out the swing but, since I've always been a lower ball hitter I may never get to optimal launch angles, thus, weakening the lofts would help launch it higher and closer to the optimal number.  The offset thing still has me confused.

I think his thoughts were, yes, I have a swing issue to iron out however, these changes would provide an immediate improvement.

I agree that it all sounds a bit contrary to what you would think however, they are a top rated clubfitter in this years Golf Digest's HOT LIST issue.


Posted

Weakening the lofts is not going to lead to more distance. It will more or less make your 5 iron go just as far and just a high as your 6-iron, not a magically higher and longer 5-iron.

Do you hit your 6-iron further or as far as your 5-iron? Very unlikely, yet that is the case needed for this whole "weakening of the lofts" thing to work.

Driver: taylormade.gif R9 Superdeep TP 8.5* - Aldila RIP 70x | 3-Wood: taylormade.gif R9 TP 15* - Diamana Blueboard 83x | Hybrid: taylormade.gif Rescue TP 19* - Motore F3 95x | Irons: taylormade.gif RAC TP MB 3-PW - Dynamic Gold x100 | Wedges: taylormade.gif TP xFT 54.12* and 60.10* - Dynamic Gold s400 | Putter:  ping.gif Karsten Anser - 33"

Posted


Hot List doesn't equal instant credibility.  He could be a great guy, but these changes won't yield any immediate improvement-and they certainly won't add distance.

Originally Posted by MikeLowry5

Not looking for anything stiffer, it's what he put in my hand.  I like hitting heavier clubs (from what I've tested) as they are easier to swing.  With the lighter clubs I tend to swing out of control too much.

I was hitting a 6 iron.

The idea of hitting the ball higher does make sense to add distance however the offset idea confused me.  I agree there are optimal shot heights/launch angles/landing angles.  If you can see my angle of attack, it is too steep which would aid in de-lofting the club.  His theory was, yes I need to shallow out the swing but, since I've always been a lower ball hitter I may never get to optimal launch angles, thus, weakening the lofts would help launch it higher and closer to the optimal number.  The offset thing still has me confused.

I think his thoughts were, yes, I have a swing issue to iron out however, these changes would provide an immediate improvement.

I agree that it all sounds a bit contrary to what you would think however, they are a top rated clubfitter in this years Golf Digest's HOT LIST issue.




Posted

My .02.

I weakened my lofts 1 degree (6-P) to start my PW at 48 and strengthened the 3-4 iron 1 degree to spread out my distances as the 4-5-6 were set at 3 degrees apart (kept the 3-4 at 3 degrees.  The reason I did this was to cover more distance and it was based on my experience of playing golf for the last 20 or so years at 5-8 index. So does weakening give you more distance?  Well in the regards to covering more distance it does, but what he is talking about would make more sense with someone who has a really slow swing speed who would be switching from an 8 degree driver to a 12.  If he is bending everything weak just so you can hit your mid-long irons then you need to fix your swing.

I went with less offset than previous clubs because I don't need it and I didn't like looking at it.  More offset gives a measure of forgiveness for people that are a hair late squaring the club and is usually progressive as you move up the irons.  What this guy is saying doesn't make a lot of sense to me and before you go and get all measured up and fitted, I would invest some time finding out why you hit the ball so low.

My suggestions that you can take any way you want:

Buy the book The Impact Zone and get a good understanding of swing dynamics (you only need the first 5 or 6 chapters).

Start working with a pro to work on ball striking with the clubs you have.

Go and buy some new clubs but ask your pro what he would suggest after working with you.

For me, it is pretty simple as I went with DG S300s.  It is a familiar shaft that is proven, affordable and they work for me. I am just noticing that they are not the "It" shaft at the moment, but you will find more than your fair share of them in many players bags from top amateurs to to top PGA Tour Pros and everywhere in between.

Good luck and keep us posted.  Just don't rush into something if it doesn't seem right and feel free to get a second opinion from a competitor or local pro.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

Modifying your clubs to mask a swing fault insures that fault will never be fixed.

:tmade: 09 Burner
:cobra: Speed LD F 3 wood
:cobra: Baffler 20 degree hybrid
:cobra: Baffler TWS 23 hy
:ping: G15 5-UW
:snake_eyes: 56 deg SW 
:snake_eyes: 60 - 12 wedge  
:scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2


Posted

@Mikelowry5 - lots of great advice in here bro

"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Note: This thread is 5460 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.