Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5379 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

Years ago I had an inxepensive $20 - $30 rangefinder/scope. I remember having to aim and focus on the pin/flag to get a reading. I now have my skycaddie, for distance to doglegs/eofs, parts of the green, hazards, etc. Although hitting range balls is not as accurate as real balls, a gps can not help determine distances at a range, Similarly, going to my local course end of day, when empty, I would like to hit balls, using various clubs, without chasing them using my gps. Do rangefinders still need to point to the pin, or any object such as trees? Can any be used to point to my ball and find the distance? And if so, can anyone recommend a decent one at a reasonable price?


Posted


Originally Posted by Alohaed

Hi all,

Years ago I had an inxepensive $20 - $30 rangefinder/scope. I remember having to aim and focus on the pin/flag to get a reading. I now have my skycaddie, for distance to doglegs/eofs, parts of the green, hazards, etc. Although hitting range balls is not as accurate as real balls, a gps can not help determine distances at a range, Similarly, going to my local course end of day, when empty, I would like to hit balls, using various clubs, without chasing them using my gps. Do rangefinders still need to point to the pin, or any object such as trees? Can any be used to point to my ball and find the distance? And if so, can anyone recommend a decent one at a reasonable price?

The scope type you apparently had are purely optical and mostly worthless.  The modern laser rangefinder can be used to measure the distance to any object within its visual range.  I shoot trees, bunker lips, mounds - all sorts of things other than flags - to help me plan my shots.  However, a ball 200 yards downrange is an awfully small target.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You would be better off going to your ball and shooting back to your starting point to measure distance.

Iacas will recommend the Leupold and I think they are the nicest looking rangefinders and have the nicest display, however I sold my GX4 for the 1600 Bushnell (with slope) and could not be happier.  I get one consistent dimension when using this rangefinder as opposed to 4-5 from the Leupold.  Both of these are the top of the line models from each company and run between $350-$500 on Ebay and Amazon new.

Good luck.


Posted


Originally Posted by MikeLowry5

You would be better off going to your ball and shooting back to your starting point to measure distance.

Iacas will recommend the Leupold and I think they are the nicest looking rangefinders and have the nicest display, however I sold my GX4 for the 1600 Bushnell (with slope) and could not be happier.  I get one consistent dimension when using this rangefinder as opposed to 4-5 from the Leupold.  Both of these are the top of the line models from each company and run between $350-$500 on Ebay and Amazon new.

Good luck.


Only one hitch.  If it has slope it can't be used for any round played under the rules of golf.  If you ever plan on carrying a handicap or playing in a tournament, then you are wasting your money on the slope feature.  If you have a clue about playing the game you don't need that feature anyway.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5379 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.