Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4975 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

For all you swing experts/instructors and those that are knowledgeable -- meaning a lot of people here - I will lead with this introduction.

I took lessons from senior Haney instructors for several years and there was quite an emphasis, besides a position at the top, on the rotation of and swinging the arms, the back of the left hand towards the target, and not much, if anything, on the arm-body connection. I remember them saying "Now swing you arms as fast as you can."

Foley's instruction, I believe he is more TGM with elements of S&T;, is very different to me. I eventually took lessons from a TGM instructor and appreciated the arm-body connection and the importance of the lower body. Now I've studied the S&T; book and introduced some elements of it into my game -- but I still have this Haney habit of the arms taking over -- it's almost as if I've got to say don't swing the arms to allow a good swing to occur. I've got to think about that front knee moving first to help bring the club down -- instead of trying to swing the arms -- at least that is the feeling I have for a successful swing (besides other elements).

I've heard Foley say there wasn't much, if anything, that made sense to him with Haney's swing and Tiger.

The question is: are these swing philosophies so far apart that Tiger is taking seemingly longer to adjust to Foley's instruction? Or, is it, as Haney said, and I paraphrase, During the last year we were together, Tiger's dedication slipped. (life got in the way - divorce, etc.) I've also heard over the years that Tiger is a nervous golfer - perfect on the range, but slips on the course.

But I was more interested in the question - are the swings so different that Tiger is having a more difficult time adjusting to what many believe are sounder, fundamental principles with some old "newer" elements introduced?

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tiger has more on his mind than he ever has.

He is under a lot of pressure to perform and be Americas 'golf hero' again, he's 35, injured, divorced and constantly scrutinized.

He has kids to look after, a huge range of younger players starting to make their mark on tour and is changing his entire swing

No wonder it is taking longer than expected by most.

Guy just needs a break IMO

  • Upvote 1

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


  • Administrator

Tiger's taken 18-24 months to ingrain swing changes in the past. He's been with Foley for barely six.

That's all I'll say on that.

Every golf swing involves using the arms. Some players, even in S&T;, are told "get the arms down faster." Zeph can attest to that.

My biggest problem with Haney's method is that he rolled #3 really, really early, took the hands up above the plane like crazy, and then Tiger had to try to time "dropping" them back to on plane. Too much and he was well under the plane and stuck.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The over and under loopy loop instruction that Haney teaches is exactly what he tried with Ray Romano and we all know how that worked out.

The timing required to execute such a motion is only accomplished by the best athletes whom are talented to being with.  Of course, Tiger being the athlete he is and other young strapping athletes are able to make it work.  The everyday player not so much...

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X




Originally Posted by Deryck Griffith

The over and under loopy loop instruction that Haney teaches is exactly what he tried with Ray Romano and we all know how that worked out.

The timing required to execute such a motion is only accomplished by the best athletes whom are talented to being with.  Of course, Tiger being the athlete he is and other young strapping athletes are able to make it work.  The everyday player not so much...



Yes, the Haney rotation of the arms on the way back, and down will cause the loop and  get the club stuck.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by iacas

Tiger's taken 18-24 months to ingrain swing changes in the past. He's been with Foley for barely six.

That's all I'll say on that.

Every golf swing involves using the arms. Some players, even in S&T;, are told "get the arms down faster." Zeph can attest to that.

My biggest problem with Haney's method is that he rolled #3 really, really early, took the hands up above the plane like crazy, and then Tiger had to try to time "dropping" them back to on plane. Too much and he was well under the plane and stuck.


I am sure all of what you said is correct ... if I knew #3.

I guess you've got to be around Haney's people to appreciate my point. Looking at the Bay Hill video of Tiger's swing, that position at the top, I think, is one that Haney likes -- now, how Tiger got there is entirely different - but the space between the arms - the triangle formed - is what Haney's people are after - which surprised me -- I thought Tiger's arms would be  deeper.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When we say haney emphasizes a looping motion - are we speaking about it in such a manner as Furyks? Or different?  Furyk brings the club straight back or over plane and loops back down into position and on plane, correct?

Similar to furyk just not as exaggerated?

Driver: adams.gif Speedline 9032LS RIP Shaft (Stiff)

3 Wood: adams.gif Oviation 3Wood

Hybrids: taylormade.gif Rescue 18* 3H - 22* 4H

Irons: callaway.gif X-24 Hot Irons 5-PW

Wedges: cleveland.gif CG15 52, 56

 

Putter: odyssey.gif PT 82

Ball:  e6


  • Administrator

Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

I am sure all of what you said is correct ... if I knew #3.

Power accumulator #3. Rolling the wrists, basically.

Originally Posted by bkoguy07

When we say haney emphasizes a looping motion - are we speaking about it in such a manner as Furyks? Or different?  Furyk brings the club straight back or over plane and loops back down into position and on plane, correct?

Kinda.

Haney's was to roll the clubface, lift the hands and arms above the plane, then "drop them" (usually resulting in getting well under plane) in transition. So the "loop" was out and up, then down and in.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4975 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 307 - Mirror swings, focusing on rotation. That seems to take pressure off my lead hip. 
    • With a lot of help from @iacas, I was able to take a great trip down to Pinehurst this past week. Took advantage of having a day off because of Veteran's Day and spent 4 days in the Pinehurst area. @iacas, @Hardspoon, @GolfLug, and @NCGolfer joined me for at least 1 round on the trip. I got in 2 courses in Pinehurst proper - Southern Pines and Pine Needles - and then the Duke golf course in Durham and Tobacco Road. All of the courses were new to me, and I really liked all of them. I am going to add more to this later when I have some time, but I wanted to post a quick recap/thoughts for each course. Duke Golf Club I really enjoyed this course. It's a big ballpark that goes up and down a couple of hills. The front 9 starts off going straight downhill, with 1 and 2 being similar dogleg left, downhill par 4s. You make your way to the bottom of the hill with a par 3 that plays over a lake, and then you creep up slowly. The best hole on the front is the 7, the first par 5. It's a dogleg right goes downhill to a small green protected by a creek and bunkers. If you can get your ball to the fairway, you should have a chance at going for the green in 2. That shot was probably the most memorable one I had on this course. You then crest the hill again with the tee shot on 9, which is a par 5 that goes down the hill and then the green is back on top of the hill by the clubhouse.  The back only goes up and down the hill once, so it's slightly more tame than the front. I really liked 11, which is another par 5. The tee shot plays down the hill, and if you hit a good one, you could have a mid iron into your hand with your second shot. The green is huge, but protected by a creek that runs in front of it. The closing stretch of holes are pretty good. 16 is a short par 4 playing straight up hill. Distance control with a wedge is really important. 17 is slightly uphill, but the trick is navigating the uneven lies in the fairway. 18 is fairly straightforward but a stout par 4 to end the round. The only negative is that there were a lot of holes with forced carries to the green. 4, 7, 11, 12, and 13 all had ponds or creeks fronting the green. Most of those required hefty carries.  Bottom line, I liked the course and the setting. I would be happy to play here regularly. Pine Needles I loved this course. The setting reminded me a lot of #2, and it feels like a mini #2 with a lot of small, turtleback-type greens. The opening 5 holes were outstanding. 1 was a really cool par 5 that was no gimme. The green was pretty wild. 2 was a long, downhill par 4. 3 was one of my favorite par 3s that we played - over a lake with bunkers framing the green. 4 was a short uphill par 4 that I really liked. 5 was an excellent but tough par 3, sitting on a shelf well above the tee. It's a great opening stretch. And again, the feel and look of the place is unique to the Pinehurst area. It feels like something you wouldn't find anywhere else. Other highlights - the green site on 9 was really cool. There is a big run off area to the right of the green that you want to avoid. It reminded me a bit of the second hole at Sand Valley - you don't want to be right of that green either. 12 was a great hole. You can't see the green from the tee, as the tee shot plays over a hill. When you see the green, it looks tiny, with a huge runoff and bunkers to the left of the green. The fairway is pretty wide, so the trick is accuracy with your approach shot. 18 was an extremely cool finishing hole. You can't really see the fairway off the tee, but it turns out to be fairly generous when you get there. And then the green site is fantastic - sitting at the bottom of the hill, but still requiring precision to be on it. I really want to get back and play this course again. There are a few shots that I want to try again (the drive on 10, the approach on 12, the drive on 18). And I just really loved the look and feel of the place. A great course and a fun day of golf. Southern Pines I thought this was the best course of the 4 I played. It's wider than Pine Needles, and the greens are bigger. But the greens are much more undulating. The land here is truly excellent. There is a ton of land movement, and seemingly every hole has elevation changes you have to navigate. I really like both par 5s on the front. If you hit good drives on both, you will get a big kick down the fairway. If you don't, you're going to be faced with a long 2nd shot just to have a wedge in. 2 plays down the hill with the tee shot and then back up the hill with the approach. You have to be careful about club selection and distance control there. 7 was a good, fairly long par 3 with a green perched on a ledge. 11 was a driveable par 4 with a wild green. 15 was really cool as well - the tee shot is downhill, but then the green is back uphill. This is a course I would love to play everyday. It's a thinking man's course, because you have to be really careful with all the elevations changes there. You constantly have to play and commit to a club longer or shorter than the distance. And I don't really think there are any bad holes. Only negative is that a few holes are a bit repetitive - 4, 16, and 18 are all shorter par 4s where you're hitting an uphill approach wedge or short iron. This is a very minor nit, though. One of the best courses I've played. I'd have to think about where exactly to rank it, but easily within the top 10. Possibly cracking the top 5. I will play this again next time I'm in Pinehurst. Tobacco Road I had a blast at this course. It is unique and pretty wild. You start out with these massive dune-like hills pinching in on your tee shot on 1. And then the entire round feels like you're going around these massive dunes. There are a lot of interesting shots here. You have long carries over bunkers, blind tee shots, shots into tiny greens, shots into huge greens, carries over deep bunkers, downhill shots, uphill shots, you name it. The setting is incredible. It is a huge course, and the fairways and greens tend to be very generous. I want to write more about individual holes later. But I really liked 7, 9, 10, and 16. I want to play a couple of the par 3s again with different hole locations and/or different tee boxes. 6 and 17, in particular, could play like wildly different holes with a different hole location (for 17) or coming from a different tee box (for 6).  While I had a lot of fun seeing this course, I do feel like a smart golfer could get bored here. To me, it was fairly obvious that Strantz was trying to bait you into trying a bunch of hard shots. On 11, for example, if you hit a good drive to the right side of the fairway, you could have a shot at the green in 2. But the green is over a massive bunker that has to be 40 feet below the green. And the green is narrow, essentially facing perpendicular to you. The only chance you really have is to hit a perfect shot. The alternative is an easy lay up to a wide fairway, leaving you with a wedge at the perfect angle. Maybe I try going for it with a 7 iron or something shorter, but that's about it. I felt similar on 5 - the direct line to the green is not that far and the green is driveable, But if you miss, you're going to have a 40ish yard bunker shot or a lost ball. Meanwhile, if you play to the right, you have a massive fairway and you'll likely be left with a wedge in your hand. I think it would be fun to play with 2 balls on some of these holes and try the shots. If you are a LSW disciple, though, you are not going to try the crazy risky shots Strantz is trying to bait you into. In the end, I really enjoyed this course. But I think it's below PN or SP. It's still awesome, and it was fun to see and play. I would come back here, but it's a lower priority than other Pinehurst courses. Well, that ended up being longer than I was anticipating. I may add some more thoughts about specific holes later, but this is a good starting point. I do want to think more about course ratings out of 10 for these, too. More to come...
    • Day 123: did a stack session.
    • Day 48 - 2024-11-17 A little work before Junior Elite. Left thumb and the compensating left wrist are better; still not great.
    • I watched a re-release of The Fifth Element.  I am going to give this movie a tap in Eagle. It's a wells shot movie. The actors are great. The story is interesting, and the setting is fascinating. For it being just over 2 hours, the pacing is phenomenal. I really enjoyed watching this sci-fi classic. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...