Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Golfers as Course Designers - Why???


Note: This thread is 5322 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Let me start by saying this is not a go at Jack Nicklaus or the other older greats who got into this years ago when let's face it we needed new courses to expand the great game or tired courses needed redesigned. They are good at it.

If you look at most golfers websites they have a course design section - WHY???? Just because they play the game and are reasonably good at (some of them) does it make them think they can design a cousre or worse have a design business. I play golf and I know what a nice course looks like, but could I desgn a course??? A lot of player/designers for get the guys who are going to play the cousre for the 51 weeks of the year when the pros aren't playing. Does an ex-player or current player make a good designer?

In my mizuno.gif Neo Cart Bag or rife.gif Staff Bag on clicgear.gif 2.0 Trolley
 Driver: R11 10.5* |  3W: CB4 15* | adams.gif Hybrid: Idea Pro (20* & 23*)
bridgestone.gif Irons: J36 Cavity Back (5-PW) | vokey.gif Wedges: S.M Oil Cans: 52.08, 56.08 & 60.04
rife.gif Putter: 2-bar Hybrid Blade | bridgestone.gif Ball: B330-RX  Ball: Pro V1

 


Posted

There's this thing called money. Developers figure that if they have a big name attached to their property, the value of its real estate tracts and premium club memberships will increase. Unless his last name is Jones, Dye, or Fazio, no course designer can generate the buzz of, say, Greg Norman or Davis Love (to name two golfers whose names adorn high-end private courses very near my own house). It was a great business for a marquee player to get into until a few years ago.

  • Upvote 1

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

Part of it is the big name. It looks better to have a course designed by Greg Norman than Joe No-Name. Another part of it I think is because top pros have played the best courses all over the world, so they usually have a good sense of what works, and what doesn't work. What players like and what players don't like. What is fair and what isn't fair. They don't always get it right, but a lot of top players have designed some pretty nice golf courses.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree with all the points made. So where does Paul Casey fit into this?

In my mizuno.gif Neo Cart Bag or rife.gif Staff Bag on clicgear.gif 2.0 Trolley
 Driver: R11 10.5* |  3W: CB4 15* | adams.gif Hybrid: Idea Pro (20* & 23*)
bridgestone.gif Irons: J36 Cavity Back (5-PW) | vokey.gif Wedges: S.M Oil Cans: 52.08, 56.08 & 60.04
rife.gif Putter: 2-bar Hybrid Blade | bridgestone.gif Ball: B330-RX  Ball: Pro V1

 


Posted


Originally Posted by the19thhole

Does an ex-player or current player make a good designer?

Sometimes. If they have an eye for golf course architecture, I don't see a big deal with them designing a course. Although I would bet some of the players designing today are just adding their name to the project, picking up a nice check and farming it out to someone on their design team. In the present economy though, I have to imagine it's tough to get design work for a lot of these guys.

Alan Olson

Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!
Check out our Facebook page!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As one poster already pointed out.. It's all about the money and name recognition..  I guess it's all about what you like and don't like as well.. If you remove Pete Dye's name from Whistling Straits, most people would avoid that course at all cost.. It just isn't fun.. Even looking at Jack's courses, which I do live in Ohio so I know them, I wouldn't take my wife to any of them with me.. She just isn't good enough to enjoy Jack's "target golf" philosophy..  My philosophy of good course design is that a course should challenge and be enjoyed by ALL at any level or style of play..  Rather you are a duffer or a pro, a roller or a placer, a course should accommodate them all..


Note: This thread is 5322 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.