Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5409 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted


Originally Posted by ThominOH

Very well put uttexas..

I've just always viewed golf courses the same as sculpture..  You don't put together a Venus de Milo, it was already there, all the artist did was remove the excess..  Same with golf.. You don't ADD to the land to create something that wasn't naturally there, you just chip away unneeded extras.. It's probably why I love natural links type courses, like St. Andrews and most of Augusta National..



It isn't always possible to just cut the course from the land.  The land offered for golf courses isn't always the best piece available.  Often as not it's the chunk left over after they planned the residential layout, and the designer is stuck with it.  We have a Dye Designs course in the northern Metro area here called Riverdale Dunes.  It was built on what was formerly an onion field, and the total elevation change from highest point to lowest was just 14 inches.  They had no choice but to move a lot of earth to create anything remotely like a real golf course.  What they came up with has made the GD top 100 several times.

It is a very playable course, while still being very challenging too.  It also happens to be a municipal course.  It has the ties, it has water, it has nasty bunkers of a typical Dye course, but it's still fun to play if you make the effort to think your way around the course.  If you just try to blast every tee shot you probably won't have a lot of fun there.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Fourputt

It isn't always possible to just cut the course from the land.  The land offered for golf courses isn't always the best piece available.  Often as not it's the chunk left over after they planned the residential layout, and the designer is stuck with it.  We have a Dye Designs course in the northern Metro area here called Riverdale Dunes.  It was built on what was formerly an onion field, and the total elevation change from highest point to lowest was just 14 inches.  They had no choice but to move a lot of earth to create anything remotely like a real golf course.  What they came up with has made the GD top 100 several times.

It is a very playable course, while still being very challenging too.  It also happens to be a municipal course.  It has the ties, it has water, it has nasty bunkers of a typical Dye course, but it's still fun to play if you make the effort to think your way around the course.  If you just try to blast every tee shot you probably won't have a lot of fun there.

Great points.  Riverdale Dunes looks fantastic. If ever in area gotta look it up.


Posted


Originally Posted by Fourputt

It is a very playable course, while still being very challenging too.  It also happens to be a municipal course.  It has the ties, it has water, it has nasty bunkers of a typical Dye course, but it's still fun to play if you make the effort to think your way around the course.  If you just try to blast every tee shot you probably won't have a lot of fun there.


I like a course where you can't hit a driver 275-300 yards every hole. I play with a lot of 20 and 30 yr old golfers, that have know idea what course management is. I'm not say all younger golfers, just many that don't understand anything more than bomb and gouge.

Only one Pete Dye course within a close drive of me, Ruffled Feathers.Didn't care for it as green fees go for around $90-100

and it's not worth the money. It is not kept in a condition that is worth that price, and there are houses on the course.  I don't want to be playing my 2nd shot out of someone's back yard.

Driver: X460 tour- 9.5*
3-wood: 3+ - 13*
Hybrid: BB HW 20*
Hybrid: 24*
Irons: X-20 Uniflex SteelWedges: Colonial 56* & 60*Putter: XG SabertoothBall: GPS-8âIf you are caught on a golf course during a storm and are afraid of lightning, hold up a 1-iron. Not even God...


Note: This thread is 5409 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
    • Day 281 6-10 Full swing, fast, getting low point ahead of "towel".  Working on flow during this seems to help. 
    • Wordle 1,817 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.